COVID-19 patient treated with ivermectin dies, attorney says

Authored by cleveland19.com and submitted by GrimeyJosh

CINCINNATI (WXIX/Gray News) – A man with COVID-19 whose wife sued to force a hospital to treat him with ivermectin has died, according to his attorney.

Jeffrey Smith, 51, was diagnosed with COVID-19 in July and was in the intensive care unit at West Chester Hospital.

Smith’s attorney told WXIX he died on Sept. 25.

In August, Butler County Common Pleas Judge Gregory Howard ordered the hospital to treat Smith with ivermectin after his wife filed an emergency order for use of the drug.

In the complaint, Smith’s wife said she began researching COVID treatment options and came across several articles where patients were given ivermectin. After treatment, she claimed all of the patients were discharged from the hospital.

The judge’s ruling required the hospital to allow Dr. Fred Wagshul to administer 30 mg of ivermectin to Smith every day for three weeks.

But two weeks after the initial ruling, another Butler County Common Pleas Court judge, Michael Oster, said the hospital was not required to give Smith ivermectin.

Oster based his ruling on the lack of evidence showing the anti-parasitic is likely to succeed in treating COVID-19, according to court documents obtained by WXIX.

Ivermectin is not approved by the Food and Drug Administration for use against the coronavirus. The drug is approved for use against some parasitic worms, head lice and some skin conditions.

The FDA says it is doing “initial research” into its effectiveness against COVID-19 and adds taking the drug in large doses is dangerous and can cause serious harm.

The FDA has discouraged the drug from being used to treat patients hospitalized with COVID-19 and from it being used as a preventative measure.

Copyright 2021 WXIX via Gray Media Group, Inc. All rights reserved.

Black-Thirteen on October 4th, 2021 at 18:49 UTC »

Diagnosed in JULY??? That's one hell of a COVID case!

Mrfrednot on October 4th, 2021 at 18:19 UTC »

What I find completely bewildering is that the company itself has released a statement:

It is important to note that, to-date, our analysis has identified:

-No scientific basis for a potential therapeutic effect against COVID-19 from pre-clinical studies; -No meaningful evidence for clinical activity or clinical efficacy in patients with COVID-19 disease, and; -A concerning lack of safety data in the majority of studies.

We do not believe that the data available support the safety and efficacy of ivermectin beyond the doses and populations indicated in the regulatory agency-approved prescribing information.

This is the company itself. They told the world not to use it for covid.

Read it: https://www.merck.com/news/merck-statement-on-ivermectin-use-during-the-covid-19-pandemic/

NotBlackieLawless on October 4th, 2021 at 16:01 UTC »

In August, Butler County Common Pleas Judge Gregory Howard ordered the hospital to treat Smith with ivermectin after his wife filed an emergency order for use of the drug.

In the complaint, Smith’s wife said she began researching COVID treatment options and came across several articles where patients were given ivermectin. After treatment, she claimed all of the patients were discharged from the hospital

Welp.