The Satanists are right: Texas' abortion ban is a direct attack on freedom of religion

Authored by salon.com and submitted by ppldontread
image for The Satanists are right: Texas' abortion ban is a direct attack on freedom of religion

Trolling is largely associated with humor-impaired right-wing bullies, but there are still some on the left who know how to troll with wit and style while serving the forces of good instead of evil.

Take, for instance, the Satanic Temple of Salem, Massachusetts, a perennial thorn in the side of Christian fundamentalists who try to pass off their theocratic impulses as "religious freedom." The Temple, which is a pro-secular organization and does not literally worship Satan, routinely pulls stunts like suing states that display Christian imagery on public grounds to make them also display Satanic imagery. The group also stands for reproductive rights, and as Brett Bachman reports for Salon, is fighting the Texas abortion ban by declaring that abortion is one of their sacred rituals, making the ban a major imposition on their free expression of religion.

The Satanists' trolling worked. The move triggered all the right people, by which I mean misogynist prigs who have way too much interest in other people's sex lives.

Texas Republican Rep. Dan Crenshaw's tweet was an immediate contender for the Self-Aware Wolves hall of fame. It's the Satanists — whose mission is "to encourage benevolence and empathy among all people, reject tyrannical authority, advocate practical common sense, oppose injustice, and undertake noble pursuits" — and not Crenshaw who are clearly on the right side of history and human rights.

But this move by the Satanic Temple serves a higher purpose than trolling forced-birth advocates like Crenshaw. The Satanists are highlighting an issue that often gets lost in the debate over reproductive rights: The anti-choice movement is just one part of a larger effort by Christian fundamentalists to covertly turn the U.S. into a more theocratic state.

Want more Amanda Marcotte on politics? Subscribe to her newsletter Standing Room Only.

Anti-choice politics are driven by a small and shrinking group of hard-right white evangelicals who wish to foist their religious views on the majority, in violation of the First Amendment-enshrined value of free exercise of religion. The Texas abortion ban is tied to a larger agenda to undermine LGBTQ rights, replace science with religious dogma, and otherwise violate the constitutional prohibition of the establishment of religion.

Conservatives go to great lengths to hide how much being anti-abortion is about forcing all Americans to live by the religious tenets of the white evangelical minority. Indeed, Republicans will often try to pretend "science" is motivating abortion bans, as former New Jersey governor Chris Christie did over the weekend on ABC, when he declared, "One of the reasons you're seeing a decline in abortion is an increase in science and how much more people know about viability." He then went on to baselessly claim that people are "much more appalled by the act of abortion than they were back in 1973."

As with pretty much everything that's said in defense of abortion bans, Christie spouts lies all the way down.

Support for abortion rights has remained steady since 1973 and strong majorities want Roe v. Wade to stay put. In 1973, scientists understood perfectly well how embryonic development worked and that understanding hasn't meaningfully changed since then. Embryos are not "viable" two weeks after a missed period, which is when the Texas abortion ban kicks in. Indeed, the pretense for banning abortions so early — the "fetal heartbeat" — is also a lie. As actual medical scientists and doctors told NPR, there is neither a fetus nor a heart that early in pregnancy, but more "a grouping of cells that are initiating some electrical activity" that GOP legislators misleading call a "heartbeat."

Unfortunately, these kinds of lies about "science" are common among anti-choicers. As scientists Nicole M. Baran, Gretchen Goldman, and Jane Zelikova wrote in Scientific-American in 2019, GOP legislators "actively misrepresent the work of scientists, using rhetoric to deceive the public and stoke emotional outrage," and the ideas animating abortion bans "are appallingly unscientific, and they are dangerous."

We've all been accustomed to the cynical ease with which Republicans lie, but the anti-choice lies about "science" are ridiculous even by the basement-level standards conservatives live by. These are the same folks who reject the very real science of climate change and COVID-19 vaccination, even though their anti-science views are leading to mass death and destruction. (And then they lie and claim to be "pro-life.") And it's all to serve theocratic forces who really got this anti-science ball rolling by trying to force schools to teach Christian creation myths in lieu of evolutionary biology.

It's not science that fuels this assault on abortion rights, it's religion — specifically the religion of white Christian fundamentalists.

A 2020 Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research poll shows that 67% of white evangelicals want to ban abortion, compared to only 37% of Americans overall. Even the majority of Catholics support legal abortion, despite decades of church opposition to reproductive rights. A similar 2020 poll from Pew Research shows the same results. Strong majorities of Black Protestants, white non-evangelical Protestants, Catholics and the religiously unaffiliated all support Roe v. Wade. The only group where a majority opposes abortion rights is white evangelicals.

The anti-abortion movement cannot be meaningfully separated from this theocratic movement of white evangelicals, or, for that matter, from white supremacy. It's all one big bundle of intertwined ideas, and all the same people pushing it. These are folks resolutely opposed to a multiracial democracy, and instead have a vision of the U.S. as a white supremacist state where their far-right religious views shape the laws that everyone has to live by. And despite the fact that Ten Commandments explicitly forbid bearing false witness, these theocrats lie and lie and lie — about science, about the law, about their intentions — because they know full well that their mission is anti-democratic and violates the constitutional precepts about freedom of religion.

Abortion rights are often marginalized as a "woman's issue" in American political discourse. That's offensive in itself, as women are more than half the population and access to reproductive health care affects the lives of everyone, not just women. But truly, this Texas abortion ban goes beyond even these material questions about health care access. It cuts right to the heart of the struggle defining our era, between a secular, pro-democracy majority and an authoritarian minority who wants to force its racist, theocratic view of America on the rest of us.

The Satanists get it. No amount of right-wing lying about "science" will change the fact that this abortion ban is a direct attack on freedom of religion.

DemonKyoto on September 7th, 2021 at 18:33 UTC »

Hello everyone! If you're reading this, then you've stumbled on a Reddit thread talking about Satanists/Satanism

Unfortunately as the vast, vast majority of Reddit users don't actually know much about Satanism aside from hearing about The Satanic Temple in the news, here is a helpful primer to help against some misinformation that can be confusing:

Satanism: A religion based around revering the character of Satan as a symbol of rebellion against authority.

Do Satanists believe in the devil? Some, but not many. Satanism has numerous groups (in no specific order):

Church of Satan First Satanic Church The Satanic Temple (and affiliated groups such as Satanic Delco, Satanic Bay Area, etc) Global Order of Satan United Aspects of Satan ...And More!

The vast majority of Satanism as a whole (including the above groups) are non-theistic/atheists. There do exist theistic Satanists/demonolators (whether they follow LaVeyan or TST style philosophies/tenets or not), however they are much in the minority. There also exist Satanism-adjacent groups such as the Temple of Set (Satanism mixed with Ancient Egypt, split off from CoS back in the day), and Luciferians (Satanism, but focusing on reverence of Lucifer, with different ideals), however these groups may or may not refer to themselves as Satanists/Satanism.

If you are reading a thread here on Reddit about Satanism and it isn't a snarky Twitter meme, you are almost 100% reading about The Satanic Temple (otherwise it would be the Church of Satan). If you are, please make sure to use the correct name. Many people confuse the Church of Satan with The Satanic Temple. Both groups, while non-theistic Satanists, have nothing to do with each other and are kinda antithetical to one another.

Any questions? Ask!

Thanks for coming to my TED Talk, Ave domine inferni 🤘

Quick-TST-FAQ:

You aren't a real religion though!: Why yes we are! To quote from another Redditor:

"It’s a pluralistic religion with no defined doctrine or set of beliefs other than widely agreed upon principles. As a Satanic religious institution TST participates in a number of political activities and engagements meant to protect the religious and personal freedoms of all - in accordance with Satanic religious beliefs which value individual will and anti-authoritarianism."

You aren't really Satanists though!: Why yes we are! Satanism (as a modern, non-theist religion) was created in 1966 by Anton LaVey, who created the Church of Satan and The Satanic Bible. It is The Church of Satan's view that no one but them are actual Satanists. To everyone else with half a brain cell, Satanism encompasses numerous groups (as listed above). We are very much Satanists, we just do not follow LaVey's teachings, or those of that goofy-looking-fuck Peter Gilmore

Aren't you just spicy atheists?: The spiciest!

Edit: Also, thank you for the awards <3 please ensure any and all of them are or will be free ones. Reddit does not need money from us, and I would not wish money to be provided to them on my behalf. Illumina oculos tuos in nomine Satana

comments_suck on September 7th, 2021 at 18:26 UTC »

Dan Crenshaw tweeting that the Satanists are on the wrong side of history is such rich satire. The guy is all about religious freedom until it's not his own.

armchairmegalomaniac on September 7th, 2021 at 18:19 UTC »

One thing that bugs me about the phrase "freedom of religion" is that it seems to imply my freedom is constrained to a choice between which particular brand of theocracy I follow. What about my freedom from religion? What about my freedom to live in a country that respects evidence based science? What about my freedom to live my life not drowning in superstitious imbeciles who all seem to share a common hatred for the modern way of life?