Texas Just Outlawed Abortion as We Knew It

Authored by thedailybeast.com and submitted by cutestudent
image for Texas Just Outlawed Abortion as We Knew It

The Supreme Court declined to act and let Texas’ insane new abortion law stand, for now, in what looks to be the day Roe v. Wade began to die.

As of today, SB8, which Gov. Greg Abbott signed into law, bans abortions at six weeks, with no exception for rape or incest, while targeting anyone who “aids or abets” another person’s abortion. The idea is to make anyone who helps a woman get an abortion a legal target, even her Uber driver, with any citizen able to collect a bounty on abortion providers.

The six-week gestation period comes from the crazy far-right “heartbeat bills,” which originated in Ohio with a fringe group called faith2action and have since been all the rage among Republican lawmakers. I would like to point out that a six-week-old fetus looks like a tadpole and is one-eighth to a quarter of an inch long, but this bill isn’t about saving the “life” of someone the size of a quarter; this bill is about changing the standards of viability to effectively make it impossible for a woman to end a pregnancy.

“About 90 percent of women who come to Whole Woman’s Health clinics are more than six weeks into their pregnancy,” Amy Hagstrom Miller, the head of Whole Woman’s Health, an abortion provider with four clinics in Texas, told the Texas Tribune. Most people don’t even know they’re pregnant after six weeks; that’s one missed menstrual period.

The Supreme Court’s own precedents have barred states from banning abortion before about 22 weeks, when a fetus could be viable outside of the womb. Letting a six-week law stand is a sign that things have changed, dramatically, with the court’s new 6-3 conservative majority.

“ The only thing people should be asking themselves right now is what they are willing to do when abortion gets banned in their state. ”

There’s a lot of legal posturing here, as Republicans made their insane new law complicated by design in the hopes of sneaking it through—to the point that abortion providers had to turn to the Supreme Court, with its new majority just itching to do away with Roe, as their last best hope. And on Tuesday night, the Supreme Court did nothing, and thus let SB8 stand for now, with an emergency request to block the now-in-effect rule still pending.

“Fuuuuuuuuuuuuck,” said Imani Gandy, the senior editor of law and policy at the Rewire News group who tweets as AngryBlackLady, when I circled back with her Wednesday morning, after the court chose not to act.

She’d told me on Tuesday that “Texas Republicans know that the six-week ban is unconstitutional. They also know that no court in the country has ever upheld [an early week ban] as constitutional. So, to get around that pesky problem, they have gamed the system so that clinics, abortion funds—and because the law deputizes anyone to enforce the law—abortion providers and ‘abettors’ are too scared to do anything abortion-related out of fear that some anti-choice zealot from God-knows-where is going to file a lawsuit against them. Texas Republicans have also made it virtually impossible for attorneys to challenge these abortion laws due to some procedural jiggery pokery that could result in bankrupting any lawyer who claims in court that these laws are unconstitutional.

“It’s a really outrageous law and it is set to go into effect on Wednesday. Whether SB8 goes into effect depends on what the Supreme Court decides to do today. If it does nothing and the law goes into effect, then that ends abortion in Texas. The court will have effectively overruled Casey and Roe on the court’s ‘shadow docket,’ meaning there will have been no argument or hearing at the Supreme Court. It would be a huge deal. And it’s not out of the realm of possibility.”

Indeed, that’s exactly what happened. On Wednesday, having seen that, she said “the only thing people should be asking themselves right now is what they are willing to do when abortion gets banned in their state. Are they willing to break the law? Because that’s what it’s going to take. It’s gonna to take a nation of lawbreakers to make sure pregnant people don’t die from unsafe abortion care.”

As ugly and awful as the court’s silence was on Tuesday, things will surely get much worse when it speaks following its hearing in October on Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, a case that there’s every indication they agreed to hear to chip away at Roe, if not do away with it altogether, while kicking the abortion question back to the states.

If that happens, poor women in red states will have to drive hundreds of miles and miss work to get legal abortions in towns they don’t know with doctors they’ve never met, or they’ll get illegal abortions and start dying the way they did before Roe.

Whatever path conservatives and the court take to get there, it’s clear where they’re headed. They are hell-bent on reasserting their power over women’s bodies.

Gov. Abbott is so “pro-life” he’s suing San Antonio to try to prevent its mask mandate. The same people who think wearing a mask impedes their freedom want to control what happens in women’s uteruses because this was never about life in the first place, but about control.

hexydes on September 1st, 2021 at 14:47 UTC »

Can we teach sex ed, and provide contraceptives to people?

Republicans: No.

Ok, well then we need strong social safety nets for women that need help raising unplanned children.

Republicans: No.

Ok, well then we have allow women to make the incredibly personal decision to abort the unplanned pregnancy they have no means of supporting.

Republicans: No.

So basically, you just want to bring children into the world knowing they will struggle from the day that they're born.

Republicans: You got it!

Retardedgoblin on September 1st, 2021 at 13:20 UTC »

From what I saw, it looked like any clinic found guilty of committing an illegal abortion could be shut down, and any person who did not show up in court to defend themselves was automatically found guilty.

So really all you have to do is pool enough tithe money together or something to have everyone in a congregation sue an abortion clinic repeatedly. Now the clinic has to spend resources sending a representative to court and paying for a lawyer, and they don't get their court fees back. Even if they win.

Maybe you can get lucky and, after the 50th court date in a row, the clinic will mess up and miss the hearing and now you get back $10k to use for fees on another clinic and that evil baby murdering establishment will get shut down. Even if they don't get shut down though, you could waste a substantial amount of their funds, especially if you were crowdfunding your harrassment. This is even easier because anyone from any state can sue whomever they want, I believe. Imagine what a national megachurch could accomplish. If it's a chain of clinics that operate across the country, you can hurt the Texas clinics, as well as clinics everywhere else.

I'm no lawyer, so I could be completely wrong, but I couldn't see any punishment for a false claim other than you wasting your time and money in court. If that's the case, I wouldn't be surprised to see groups of local "heroes" fighting the good fight against tyranny. Or whatever. :(

My favorite part about all this is that, unless they stop this, it means they've successfully found a way to circumvent constitutional rights. What's stopping any other state from doing the same thing? Or, better yet, what's stopping them from making the same laws to create bounty reporting systems for suspected voter fraud, transgender bathroom child trafficking, school CRT racist hate crimes, or Soros funded antifa brick-based terrorism? You might not be able to punish anyone criminally, but you can create a fantastic system for financially draining any group you disagree with.

ImBakedLikeGoods on September 1st, 2021 at 12:37 UTC »

My republican mother in Texas is extremely pro-life. Except that time my step-sister got knocked up as a 20-something by some biker dude and my mother understood THAT case to be TOTALLY DIFFERENT and was all for abortion....