Rand Paul says scientists won't study horse-deworming drug ivermectin's use as a potential COVID cure because of their 'hatred for Trump'

Authored by news.yahoo.com and submitted by T-ROY_T-REDDIT

Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky said he was "in the middle" about whether ivermectin should be used. He said researchers did not want to study the drug because of their "hatred for Trump." Greg Nash-Pool/Getty Images

Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul said researchers won't study ivermectin because of their "hatred for Trump."

Paul said he was "in the middle" on whether ivermectin should be used and wanted more research done.

The FDA and CDC are asking people to avoid the drug, which is used to deworm horses and cows.

See more stories on Insider's business page.

Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul said researchers won't study the toxic livestock-deworming drug ivermectin as a potential COVID treatment because of their dislike for former President Donald Trump.

The Cincinnati Enquirer first reported on the remarks Paul made at a town hall event for 60 people held at the Cold Spring City Council chambers on August 27.

"The hatred for Trump deranged these people so much that they're unwilling to objectively study it," Paul said, The Cincinnati Enquirer reported. "So someone like me that's in the middle on it, I can't tell you because they will not study ivermectin. They will not study hydroxychloroquine without the taint of their hatred for Donald Trump."

Read more: We identified the 125 people and institutions most responsible for Donald Trump's rise to power and his norm-busting behavior that tested the boundaries of the US government

Paul told The Cincinnati Enquirer that he doesn't know whether ivermectin works, but that he keeps "an open mind."

Trump has not pushed ivermectin but has continually advocated for using hydroxychloroquine to treat COVID. But neither drug has proved to be effective in preventing or curing COVID-19 infections, and US health authorities have warned people against using them.

Scientists are studying ivermectin as a coronavirus treatment, and they previously investigated hydroxychloroquine as well. In the US, the National Institutes of Health is conducting a large, late-stage trial to see whether ivermectin can help people with mild or moderate COVID-19 cases feel better more quickly. The University of Oxford's PRINCIPLE trial is also studying ivermectin as a COVID-19 treatment.

Last week, the US Food and Drug Administration urged people not to self-medicate with ivermectin because it is intended for horses and other livestock.

This content is not available due to your privacy preferences. Update your settings here to see it.

The FDA also said in a statement that it received reports that people were being hospitalized after using the drug. It acknowledged that initial research was being carried out on the drug's efficacy but that the formula used for animals differed greatly from what humans were supposed to take.

The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention also released a health advisory last week, cautioning that people could become severely ill from self-medicating with ivermectin because an overdose could cause a coma, seizures, and death. Even the milder side effects of taking too much ivermectin are extremely unpleasant, the FDA said, and include nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, low blood pressure, dizziness, and other allergic reactions.

Nonetheless, people continue to take ivermectin. The CDC's numbers showed that from early July until the week of August 13, pharmacies filled more than 88,000 prescriptions of ivermectin.

Clinical studies have also shown that hydroxychloroquine, an antimalarial drug, does not help treat or prevent COVID-19. The FDA cautioned against using hydroxychloroquine after finding that the drug could cause serious heart problems, blood and lymph-node disorders, kidney injuries, and liver problems, including liver failure.

Read the original article on Business Insider

Busman123 on August 30th, 2021 at 13:00 UTC »

But it is being studied ...

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/08/30/health/covid-ivermectin-prescriptions.html

"A recent review of 14 ivermectin studies, with more than 1,600 participants, concluded that none provided evidence of the drug’s ability to prevent Covid, improve patient conditions or reduce mortality. Another 31 studies are still underway to test the drug."

quad64bit on August 30th, 2021 at 12:54 UTC »

I mean, this is 100% true. I'm a Grants processor for a large multinational research institute, and we have a checklist for immediate disqualification of grants applications to triage the approval process before it gets too far down the line. The first checkbox on the list is "Would Donald Trump approve of this work?". If the answer is yes, we just toss the application in the bin and then blacklist the scientist, making sure they never work again. We've found this has been discouraging to scientists pursuing work that the GOP and their base might find interesting. It's a core tenet of our philosophy.

First_Approximation on August 30th, 2021 at 12:51 UTC »

Except scientists are studying ivermectin as a treatment for COVID:

Ivermectin to be investigated in adults aged 18+ as a possible treatment for COVID-19 in the PRINCIPLE trial

There's already been studies in the lab and small pilot studies. Currently, the record is mixed.

The problem is people taking doses meant for 1000 pound farm animals.

Edit:Also, as the article notes:

Trump has not pushed ivermectin but has continually advocated for using hydroxychloroquine to treat COVID.

EVERYTHING about what he's saying is wrong.