Fauci: Paul doesn't know what he's talking about 'and I want to say that officially'

Authored by thehill.com and submitted by Out_Worlder
image for Fauci: Paul doesn't know what he's talking about 'and I want to say that officially'

Sen. Rand Paul Randal (Rand) Howard PaulCDC official defends sweeping mask orders for mass transit: 'Part of our arsenal' Schumer, Tim Scott lead as Senate fundraising pace heats up Rand Paul introducing measure to repeal public transportation mask mandates MORE (R-Ky.) on Tuesday escalated his ongoing feud with the nation's top infectious diseases doctor Anthony Fauci Anthony FauciJuan Williams: The GOP is criminally reckless on COVID US likely undercounting new COVID-19 cases fueled by delta variant, Gottlieb says Fauci: Smallpox wouldn't have been eradicated with today's 'false information' MORE about the role the National Institutes of Health (NIH) played in funding controversial research in Wuhan, China.

The two traded barbs during a tense exchange, triggering a shouting match in which Fauci accused Paul of lying in order to further his agenda.

During a Senate Health Committee hearing about the federal COVID-19 response, Paul said the NIH funded illegal gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, which created a highly dangerous and transmissible virus able to infect humans. Gain-of-function is a controversial method where researchers make a pathogen more infectious, often to develop more effective treatments and vaccines.

It’s an unsubstantiated accusation Paul has made before, and one Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, has denied.

In response to similar questioning during a hearing in May, Fauci said the NIH “has not ever and does not now fund gain of function research in the Wuhan Institute of Virology.”

It's not unusual for conservative Republicans and allies of former President Trump Donald TrumpGreene gets 12-hour Twitter suspension over COVID-19 misinformation Aides who clashed with Giuliani intentionally gave him wrong time for Trump debate prep: book Overnight Defense: Afghan evacuees to be housed at Virginia base | Biden looks to empty Gitmo MORE to clash with Fauci during hearings; Paul has done so on numerous occasions, as has Rep. Jim Jordan James (Jim) Daniel JordanJim Jordan among McCarthy picks for Jan. 6 panel Six takeaways: What the FEC reports tell us about the midterm elections Controversy equals cash for Greene, Gaetz MORE (R-Ohio).

In the past, Fauci has tried to remain relatively calm, if terse, even as he responds to personal attacks and accusations of a cover-up.

But on Tuesday, Paul stepped up his fight, implying that Fauci had lied to Congress, and that he was fully aware of what the Wuhan lab was doing with grant money that came from NIH.

He also suggested that Fauci and the NIH could be partly responsible for the pandemic and the deaths of 4 million people worldwide.

Paul cited an academic paper that purportedly shows the lab was conducting illegal research to create “potential pandemic pathogens that exist only in the lab, not in nature,” a claim Fauci denied in one of his angriest public exchanges to date.

“Senator Paul, you do not know what you are talking about, and I want to say that officially,” Fauci said.

“How can you say that's not gain-of-function? It's a dance and you're dancing around this because you're trying to obscure responsibility for 4 million people dying around the world from a pandemic,” Paul responded, cutting Fauci off.

“If the point that you are making is that the grant that was funded as a subaward ... created SARS-COV-2, that’s where you are getting,” Fauci said, pointing two fingers at Paul before the senator cut him off again.

“We don't know ... but all the evidence is pointing that it came from the lab and there will be responsibility for those that funded the lab, including yourself,” Paul said.

“I totally resent the lie you are now propagating, senator,” Fauci said, adding that it is molecularly impossible that research funded by NIH was responsible for SARS-CoV-2.

Paul interjected again, talking over Fauci: “You are obviously obfuscating the truth,” to which Fauci replied, “I'm not obfuscating the truth -- you are.”

“You are implying that what we did was responsible for the deaths of individuals. I totally resent that,” Fauci said. “And if anybody is lying here senator, it is you,” he added, pointing a finger at Paul.

After Paul's time expired, Sen. Tina Smith Tina Flint SmithClean electricity standard should be a no brainer amid extreme climate impacts Overnight Energy: Democrats reach budget deal including climate priorities | Europe planning to cut emissions 55 percent by 2030 | Army Corps nominee pledges not to politicize DAPL environmental review Reconciliation package to include several climate priorities left out of bipartisan framework MORE (D-Minn.) was the next lawmaker up, and with a sympathetic but bemused expression, she offered Fauci an opportunity to “counteract these attacks on your integrity that we've all just witnessed.”

“I don't think I have anything further to say,” Fauci said. “This is a pattern that Sen. Paul has been doing now at multiple hearings based on no reality. He keeps talking about gain-of-function. This has been evaluated multiple times by qualified people to not fall under the gain-of-function definition.”

He added: “I have not lied before Congress. I have never lied, certainly not before Congress. Case closed.”

This story was updated at 4:23 p.m.

blutoboy on July 20th, 2021 at 16:37 UTC »

The word "doctor" is like the word "engineer" or "lawyer". It gives you an idea of their profession/occupation. However, if i were to build a bridge that 1 million people would cross over a day, i am not hiring an electrical engineer, im hiring a civil engineer. Same goes for a criminal court case, im not hiring a Bankruptcy lawyer, im going for the criminal lawyer with experience.

Rand is an ophthalmologist, an eye doctor. Fauci is a immunologist, who serves as the director of the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID).

When cataracts become a national pandemic i'll perhaps listento paul.

Edit: Also a person in any of these fields should have the intelligence to know when they are FAR out of their wheelhouse. However i know far too many engineers, doctors and lawyers who i would not trust with a wet burnt out match. Let alone set policy for fighting a pandemic.

fairoaks2 on July 20th, 2021 at 16:01 UTC »

Rand Paul exposed his colleagues to Covid. What a cold hearted SOB.

somethingbreadbears on July 20th, 2021 at 15:53 UTC »

This actually happened to me.

Republican: I'd listen to Rand Paul, he's a doctor.

Me: He's an eye doctor.

Republican: Who are you to question his experience?