Study: COVID-19 lockdowns led to 95K fewer air pollution-related deaths globally

Authored by upi.com and submitted by cutestudent
image for Study: COVID-19 lockdowns led to 95K fewer air pollution-related deaths globally

Less traffic during COVID-19 lockdowns, similar to the pictured stretch of 42nd Street in New York City last March, is partially responsible for global reductions in air pollution that may have resulted in 95,000 fewer deaths in 2020. File Photo by John Angelillo/UPI | License Photo

May 21 (UPI) -- Business closures and stay-at-home orders intended to stem the spread of COVID-19 cut deaths caused by air pollution by an estimated 95,000 globally in 2020, an analysis published Friday by Science Advances found.

Lockdown measures imposed on and off in many countries since the start of the pandemic in March 2020 resulted in up to a 50% reduction in concentrations of nitrogen dioxide, a direct emission from vehicles and coal-powered electricity plants, in the air worldwide, the data showed.

However, while lockdowns may have led to a more than 30% drop in microscopic particulate matter released into the air as a result of burning fuel, as well as an up to 28% decline in ozone in parts of Asia, their effects in Europe and the United States were negligible.

Although the reductions in airborne pollution varied from country to country, they were significant enough in densely populated areas to have a positive, though in most cases modest, effect on related deaths, they said.

RELATED Study links vehicle exhaust exposure in childhood with later mental health risk

"The air pollution declines that we calculated are primarily due to reduced economic activity during the COVID-19 lockdown," study co-author Guillaume Chossiere told UPI in an email.

"Our study controlled for seasonal and inter-annual trends and found that the stringency of the lockdowns was a statistically significant driver of the decreases," said Chossiere, a researcher in the Laboratory for Aviation and the Environment at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Cambridge.

The findings are based on an assessment of air quality in 36 countries across three continents -- North America, Asia and Europe -- using satellite imagery and on-the-ground measurements.

The United States saw a more than 4% drop in airborne nitrogen oxide levels, but a less than 1% decline in ozone, the data showed. Airborne particulate matter levels remained relatively stable nationally as well.

As a result, the United States accounted for a fraction of the reduction in "premature deaths" -- or deaths occurring earlier than life expectancy -- caused by respiratory illnesses linked with air pollution exposure.

Conversely, China, which, along with the United States, is among the world's biggest polluters, likely made up nearly 80% of the global reduction in premature deaths attributed to air pollution, according to the researchers.

The findings suggest COVID-19 lockdowns "exerted a limited effect" on global air quality, although some parts of East Asia experienced "pronounced improvements," they said.

"Although the COVID-19 related lockdowns brought significant reductions in economic activities, air pollution levels did not decrease as much as had been speculated at first," Chossiere said.

"Primary pollution [from] nitrogen dioxide had the largest decreases and associated health benefits, but, with the notable exception of China, secondary air pollution [from] fine particulates and ozone did not bring significant health benefits," he said.

BurnerAcc2020 on May 22nd, 2021 at 19:15 UTC »

Since a lot of people who have come here for lockdown polemics appear to miss this part: "globally" really does mean globally. Out of these 95k, the vast majority are in China, so adjust your rhetoric accordingly. From the paper itself:

https://advances.sciencemag.org/content/7/21/eabe1178

Change in air pollution–related premature mortality

Aggregating across pollutants based on monitor data, we find that changes in pollutant concentrations associated with COVID lockdowns up to 6 July 2020 resulted in −95,000 (95% CI, −160,000 to −29,000) premature mortalities from NO2, PM2.5, and ozone exposure during the lockdown period. Statistically significant changes in air pollution at the 5% level contribute to −67,000 (95% CI, −115,000 to +19,000) of the total premature mortalities. For comparison, the global death toll of COVID-19 as of 6 July 2020 was 544,000. Changes in NO2 exposure account for −31,000 (95% CI, 65,000 to −2300) premature mortalities, while changes in PM2.5 exposure account for −64,000 premature mortalities (95% CI, −95,000 to −32,000) and changes in ozone exposure for 300 additional premature mortalities globally (95% CI, −190 to 800).

China accounts for 79% of the estimated decrease in total premature mortalities, including 65% of the reductions in NO2 mortalities, and 85% of the reductions in PM2.5 mortalities. For Europe, we estimate a total change of −6600 premature mortalities (95% CI, −13,000 to +380) from reduced exposure to NO2 and −6100 premature mortalities (95% CI, −9100 to +3100) from changes in PM2.5. If different CRFs are used (see Materials and Methods), we find average mortality estimates of −43,000 (95% CI, −62,000 to −25,000) for PM2.5 and −51,000 (95% CI, −62,000 to −40,000) for NO2 (see Materials and Methods). When using cause-specific CRFs, we find that changes in ambient levels of NO2 resulted in −2800 (95% CI, −11,000 to +6000) premature mortalities from respiratory diseases and −10,000 (95% CI, −41,000 to +21,000) from cardiovascular diseases. Ambient changes in PM2.5 are found to result in −10,000 (95% CI, −14,000 to −7000) premature mortalities from respiratory diseases and −38,000 (95% CI, −50,000 to −25,000) from cardiovascular diseases. Overall, using cause-specific CRFs results in a total of −60,000 (95% CI, −116,000 to −4200) premature mortalities, compared to −95,000 with the all-cause CRFs, with 75% of avoided premature mortalities being from cardiovascular diseases and 25% from respiratory diseases.

Reductions in air pollution–related premature mortalities per capita represent less than 2.8% (95% CI, 0.56 to 5.1%) of the deaths per capita from COVID-19 in the United States (51) and 6.4% (95% CI, 1.0 to 12%) in Europe, but are between 2.3 and 16 times greater than the reported number of COVID-19 deaths per capita in Asia. (Up to last July that is, so resist the urge to comment about India or the like.)

In fact, the article also says the same thing later on, but of course, even the people who should know science cannot be condensed to headlines still do not read even the articles linked.

The United States saw a more than 4% drop in airborne nitrogen oxide levels, but a less than 1% decline in ozone, the data showed. Airborne particulate matter levels remained relatively stable nationally as well.

As a result, the United States accounted for a fraction of the reduction in "premature deaths" -- or deaths occurring earlier than life expectancy -- caused by respiratory illnesses linked with air pollution exposure.

Conversely, China, which, along with the United States, is among the world's biggest polluters, likely made up nearly 80% of the global reduction in premature deaths attributed to air pollution, according to the researchers.

The findings suggest COVID-19 lockdowns "exerted a limited effect" on global air quality, although some parts of East Asia experienced "pronounced improvements," they said.

"Although the COVID-19 related lockdowns brought significant reductions in economic activities, air pollution levels did not decrease as much as had been speculated at first," Chossiere said.

"Primary pollution [from] nitrogen dioxide had the largest decreases and associated health benefits, but, with the notable exception of China, secondary air pollution [from] fine particulates and ozone did not bring significant health benefits," he said.

In the study, they say that long-term air pollution policies would have more impact than the short-term lockdowns.

Airlineguy1 on May 22nd, 2021 at 15:43 UTC »

How many air-pollution deaths are there per year in a normal year? That is not mentioned in the article which is odd.

Mal-De-Terre on May 22nd, 2021 at 14:03 UTC »

Also, flu deaths are also apparently way down as well.

Edit: Found a source to back that up:

https://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/burden/2019-2020.html

Though I'd want to see the 2020-2021 numbers to be sure.