40% of Consumers Would Switch to Municipal Broadband

Authored by reviews.com and submitted by speckz
image for 40% of Consumers Would Switch to Municipal Broadband

A recent study conducted by the Reviews.com Broadband Research Team about municipal broadband found a growing number of U.S. residents are excited about the prospect of internet service as a utility. As interest in public broadband increases, it will be interesting to follow along with potential increases in pressure placed on local politicians to push for public internet. If the below findings are any indication, it seems likely there will be an exponential increase in broadband as a public utility over the next decade.

Of the 1,008 U.S. residents surveyed:

40.2% of consumers said they would consider immediately switching to municipal broadband if it was made available in their city.

said they would consider immediately switching to municipal broadband if it was made available in their city. 10.9% of consumers said they would definitely make the switch , 29.3% said they would at least try it out.

, 29.3% said they would at least try it out. 59.8% said they prefer their current provider.

Among age groups, younger people were relatively more averse to municipal broadband than those older — 34.8% of people under 45 were averse, while 46.2% of people over 55 years old were not.

Large cities saw a majority of the population interested in municipal broadband. California, specifically the San Francisco Bay Area, saw the majority of people (56.3%) suggesting they’d be interested.

More rural areas were slightly more averse to municipal broadband, with respondents in various states with lower populations suggesting by a notable majority that they would not consider municipal service.

The idea that perhaps cities should provide internet service for their residents as a utility isn’t a new concept. The debate has been in place for decades and will likely continue to be for the foreseeable future.

Anytime a major city attempts to push municipal broadband, there is pushback from major ISPs who view the expansion of the internet as a utility as a threat to their businesses. In fact, ISPs have spent over $1.2 billion between 1998 and 2018 lobbying in Congress.

Despite this, the concept of internet service as a public good continues to gain steam, as this is the highest we have seen numbers surrounding a willingness to switch to municipal service. It seems likely that over time as connection to the internet becomes as valuable as water or electrical service that more local municipalities will make sure their residents have such access. A common solution as of now is a model of cities directly working to provide a hybrid version of municipal broadband through cooperatives.

mrrichardcranium on May 4th, 2021 at 16:44 UTC »

As long as the service is at least half of what I get from Comcast currently I’d leave in a heartbeat. Fuck Comcast. Thanks to their shitty monopolistic ways, and the FCCs previous definition of broadband my only choices are Comcast, or DSL that barely gets over 25Mbps down and less than 5Mbps up.

old_adage on May 4th, 2021 at 16:31 UTC »

Comcast implemented data caps where I live - during a pandemic where our household income was 100% attached to virtual work, where my children education was attached to virtual schools, and where most entertainment options were limited. I've payed the Troll its tax. But I will never forget.

I would switch yesterday if I had the option. Regulate these greedy fuckers.

Brbikeguy on May 4th, 2021 at 15:29 UTC »

Cant possibly be slower than my base level comcast and I'm betting it would cost a lot less.