Artificial photosynthesis device improves its own efficiency over time

Authored by newatlas.com and submitted by MistWeaver80
image for Artificial photosynthesis device improves its own efficiency over time

Devices that mimic the natural process of photosynthesis, in which plants use sunlight to turn water and carbon dioxide into energy, could one day help us tackle a number of environmental issues. Scientists have now demonstrated a new type of technology that can not only replicate this process to produce clean hydrogen fuel, but undergo morphological changes during use that makes it become more efficient over time.

The research was carried out by scientists at the University of Michigan (UM) and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, who were working with an artificial photosynthesis device previously developed by UM engineer Zetian Mi. The device promised a cleaner form of hydrogen production, which typically involves using natural gas or electrical energy, by instead harnessing sunlight to split fresh and salt water and generate hydrogen for use in fuel cells.

Built from silicon and gallium nitride, materials commonly used in electronics and solar cells, the device offered an impressive three-percent solar-to-hydrogen efficiency, compared to the one-percent efficiency offered by previous devices. It achieved this through a "cityscape" of gallium nitride towers on a silicon backing that turned sunlight into free electrons, which in turn split the water into hydrogen and oxygen.

The artificial photosynthesis devices relies on towers of gallium nitride to turn light into electrons Faqrul A. Chowdhury, McGill University

These results were published back in 2018, but the scientists have continued studying the device to better understand the reasons behind its superior efficiency. In the latest study, the team used a range of advanced microscopy and spectroscopy techniques to observe the materials in action, and uncovered some surprises.

While an artificial photosynthesis device would normally be expected to decline in performance in a matter of hours as the materials wear out, this one actually grew more efficient over time. The scientists' observations revealed that as the system was used, the very tops of the gallium nitride towers formed new sites for hydrogen production by absorbing oxygen and taking on new properties, becoming a material known as gallium oxynitride.

A scientists tinkers with a self-improving artificial photosynthesis device developed by US researchers Berkeley Lab

“We discovered an unusual property in the material that enables it to become more efficient and stable,” says Francesca Toma, senior author of the paper. “Our discovery is a real game-changer. I’ve never seen such stability.”

For their next steps, the scientists will experiment with the material as part of a complete photoelectrochemical cell for splitting water, which will include exploring how similar materials might make these systems even more stable.

“The collaboration helped to identify the fundamental mechanisms behind why this material gets more robust and efficient instead of degrading," says Mi. "The findings from this work will help us design and build more efficient artificial photosynthesis devices at a lower cost.”

The research was published in the journal Nature Materials.

manlyman1417 on April 9th, 2021 at 14:25 UTC »

This is very cool in itself, but I have to object to calling this photosynthesis.

The original researchers don’t even seem to use the term to describe this, and rightly so. This is just water splitting via photocatalysis, something plenty of groups are doing.

Water splitting is a step in photosynthesis, but hydrogen isn’t a product (notice how trees aren’t randomly combusting all the time?) and “artificial photosynthesis” would be so much more of an incredible feat/newsworthy.

We can get into a semantics argument about how this is a synthesis from light (photo) and therefore is a kind of photosynthesis, but the author from New Atlas references photosynthesis from plants in his very first sentence - and that just seems wrong. Photosynthesis is a far more complex reaction than this.

zoinkability on April 9th, 2021 at 13:22 UTC »

This seems like a cool discovery, but be aware that it's still a long way off from the efficiencies needed to be better than simply using the existing tech of regular solar panels to power standard hydrogen electrolysis. Standard solar panels are in the ~20% efficiency range and electrolysis is about ~75% efficient, which means that using that existing tech you get ~15% efficiency from sunlight to hydrogen. This is in the 3% efficiency range, which while better than previous attempts at this kind of thing, would need to be improved fivefold to match what we can do currently.

davidmlewisjr on April 9th, 2021 at 12:47 UTC »

Don't let Big Oil find out or they will turn off the Sun.