<!doctype html><html class=no-js id=02585b27-d710-5fe4-bdb5-05287d4cf87d> <head><meta charset=utf-8><meta http-equiv=x-ua-compatible content="ie=edge"><title>Lauren Boebert ridiculed for claims no gun laws could have stopped Colorado shooter - The Daily Populous</title><meta name=description content="Lauren Boebert ridiculed for claims no gun laws could have stopped Colorado shooter - The Daily Populous"><meta name=viewport content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1"><link rel=icon type=image/x-icon sizes="16x16 32x32 48x48 64x64" href=favicon.ico><link rel=stylesheet href=style.css></head> <body> <div class=banner> <a href=index.html> <div class=container> <div class=logo><svg width=16px viewbox="0 0 320 320" class=dailypopulous-logo> <polygon fill=#000 opacity=1.0 points="0,140 100,140 100,180 40,180 40,280 140,280 140,0 180,0 320,0 320,180 220,180 220,140 280,140 280,40 180,40 180,320 140,320 0,320"/> </svg> </div> <div class=text><strong>The Daily Populous</strong> Thursday March 25th, 2021 <em>day</em> edition</div> </div> </a> </div> <div class=container> <header> <h1>Lauren Boebert ridiculed for claims no gun laws could have stopped Colorado shooter</h1> </header> <section id=credits> Authored by <a class=source href=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/boebert-gun-laws-boulder-shooting-colorado-b1821756.html>independent.co.uk</a> and submitted by <a href=https://www.reddit.com/u/DaFunkJunkie>DaFunkJunkie</a> </section> <article id=content> <p>Laurent Boebert has been ridiculed for claiming that there were “no gun laws” that could have stopped a gunman from carrying out the Boulder, Colorado, shooting.</p> <p>A man was charged with the deaths of 10 individuals, including an officer from the Boulder Police Department (BPD), following the shooting at a grocery store on Monday.</p> <p>The man accused of carrying out the attack brought an assault weapon six days before the incident, and was able to do so, because a court overruled a ban on assault rifles in the city of Boulder.</p> <p>As reported by the Denver Post, the ruling came 10 days before the shooting, and after a case was brought against the city by the National Rifle Association and others.</p> <p>Ms Boebert, an advocate for firearms and a congresswoman for Colorado, appeared to disregard the overruling of the city of Boulder’s ban on assault rifles, in a set of remarks on Tuesday.</p> <p>She claimed that “there are no gun laws that would’ve stopped” the gunman aside from guns in a Twitter post, which came alongside an earlier appearance on Newsmax.</p> <p>Please enter your email address Please enter a valid email address Please enter a valid email address SIGN UP Thanks for signing up to the Inside Washington newsletter {{#verifyErrors}} {{message}} {{/verifyErrors}} {{^verifyErrors}} {{message}} {{/verifyErrors}} I would like to be emailed about offers, events and updates from The Independent. Read our privacy notice Thanks for signing up to the Inside Washington newsletter {{#verifyErrors}} {{message}} {{/verifyErrors}} {{^verifyErrors}} {{message}} {{/verifyErrors}} I would like to be emailed about offers, events and updates from The Independent. Read our privacy notice</p> <p>“They [Democrats] don’t want to empower people to stop things like this, to give us the tools to stop things like this, and that’s guns,” Ms Boebert told the conservative TV channel, following calls for tighter gun control.</p> <p>She added that she personally carried a firearm when shopping because “you don’t know if there’s going to be something like this that happens,” thereby suggesting that those caught in the Boulder shooting could have done so.</p> <p>The congresswoman&#x27;s remarks on Tuesday came under fire, with one Twitter user writing: “We should not have to carry a gun in a grocery store to feel safe”.</p> <p>“No current gun laws would have stopped this, that&#x27;s correct. And that&#x27;s also the problem,” wrote another user of the need for tighter gun control. “We need those laws.”</p> <p>Others criticised Ms Boebert for ignoring that Boulder did have restrictions on assault rifles until a court reversed the order, and “If that law was still in effect this would’ve never happened.”</p> <p>The congresswoman’s appearance on Newsmax came as US president Joe Biden called for members of Congress to introduce tougher gun control laws, although the tight Democratic majority in the Senate could block any legislation on gun control.</p> </article> <div id=comments> <div class=comment> <p><a href=https://www.reddit.com/u/awesometographer>awesometographer</a><span class=time> on March 24th, 2021 at 21:22 UTC <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/mcet5q/_/gs3igov?context=1">&raquo;</a></p> <p><p>Lawmaker says current laws are insufficient.</p> </p> </div> <div class=comment> <p><a href=https://www.reddit.com/u/rumpletiltspins>rumpletiltspins</a><span class=time> on March 24th, 2021 at 20:12 UTC <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/mcet5q/_/gs38ovz?context=1">&raquo;</a></p> <p><p>The atlanta shooter also bought the gun he intended to use, days before the shooting.</p> </p> </div> <div class=comment> <p><a href=https://www.reddit.com/u/natur_al>natur_al</a><span class=time> on March 24th, 2021 at 19:50 UTC <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/mcet5q/_/gs35hp0?context=1">&raquo;</a></p> <p><p>I see she has modified her Zoom background and taken out the multiple assault rifles, curious.</p> </p> </div> </div> <nav> <a href=https://www.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/mcet5q>Discuss this article on reddit</a> <a href=index.html>Back to The Daily Populous Thursday March 25th, 2021 day edition</a> </nav> <footer> <p>This page is an archived snapshot of <a href=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/boebert-gun-laws-boulder-shooting-colorado-b1821756.html>https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/boebert-gun-laws-boulder-shooting-colorado-b1821756.html</a> taken on 2021-03-25 by The Daily Populous as part of the day edition to create a permanent, immutable record. <a href=https://dailypopulous.com/ >dailypopulous.com</a> is a non-profit website and has no advertising. You can contact us at <a href=mailto:hi@dailypopulous.com>hi@dailypopulous.com</a>.</p> </footer> </div> </body> </html> 