Opinion: Canada risks becoming house-rich and everything else-poor

Authored by financialpost.com and submitted by viva_la_vinyl
image for Opinion: Canada risks becoming house-rich and everything else-poor

Share this Story: Opinion: Canada risks becoming house-rich and everything else-poor

Opinion: Canada risks becoming house-rich and everything else-poor When housing reaches half of all business investment, we have too much of a good thing Photo by Peter J. Thompson/National Post files

Article content Canada’s buoyant housing market, with lots of new construction, booming renovations, and a torrid pace of transactions, has been a good news story in a year that had too few. But as underlined in a recent FP article called “The housing boom that never ends,” the news on housing has been a little too good. Meanwhile, other business investment – in non-residential structures, machinery and equipment, and intellectual property – has languished. We ended 2020 in a troubling place: recent GDP numbers from Statistics Canada showed that private residential investment almost equaled all other types of private investment in the fourth quarter. In other words, almost half of all private non-consumption spending was on housing. That is the highest proportion ever recorded. We apologize, but this video has failed to load.

tap here to see other videos from our team. Try refreshing your browser, or Opinion: Canada risks becoming house-rich and everything else-poor Back to video Looking at 2020 as a whole, residential investment was 20 per cent higher in real (inflation-adjusted) terms than it was in 2019, turbocharged by ultra-low interest rates and government transfers far bigger than the COVID-related hit to household incomes. By contrast, non-residential investment was lower across all categories: non-residential structures 11 per cent lower, machinery and equipment 16 per cent lower, and – even with COVID’s trumpeted boost to everything in the digital realm – intellectual property products four per cent lower.

Advertisement Story continues below This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Article content New investment outside housing was so weak that Canada’s stock of non-residential capital actually fell in 2020 Housing is good. We’re not saying it isn’t. It stimulates jobs and GDP while it’s being built, renovated and marketed, and we all want roofs over our heads. But non-residential investment also matters. Without the buildings, infrastructure, equipment, software and everything else we need to make goods and services and earn high incomes, we will end up house-rich and everything else-poor. New investment outside housing was so weak that Canada’s stock of non-residential capital actually fell in 2020. That is a major reason why forecasters, including the Bank of Canada, are marking down their projections for growth. While 2020 was extreme, Canadians’ preference for housing over other types of investment is a trend. It shows in where our financial institutions lend. Mortgage credit has grown much faster than business credit since 2000. More On This Topic Opinion: It’s not just vaccines. We trail the U.S. on business investment, too William Robson: Debt danger ahead if interest rates outpace growth 2020 Hindsight – William Robson: Our year of magical thinking Is our problem that the financial institutions that dominate the market for small and medium-size business financing in Canada extend business credit too grudgingly? Perhaps. A comparison over 2010-2017 showed a 250-basis-point spread between the interest rate charged small and medium-size businesses and that charged to large businesses – about one-fifth wider than in any other rich-world country except New Zealand.

Article content Do these institutions extend credit to would-be homeowners too readily? Yes – in part, because of government backstops. The Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC) and private insurers provide lenders of insured mortgages a 100-per cent guarantee, and the government stands behind all of the CMHC’s guarantee and 90 per cent of private insurers’ guarantees. Government backstops can reduce the likelihood of, and limit the damage from, housing-market crashes. But, for good and obvious reasons, there are no similar backstops for business lending: capitalism loses its winnowing power if every business’s debt is guaranteed. But given this dichotomy, no wonder people seeking a loan for a house have had an easier time than those seeking money for a warehouse, a backhoe, or a software upgrade. With Canadians so heavily invested in housing, and with mortgages to match, redressing this imbalance will be delicate. But it is possible. Mortgage insurance premiums charged to borrowers do not currently reflect default risk. Charging different borrowers risk-based premiums could tip the flow of credit less toward potentially overextended households and more toward businesses with viable projects. That takes us to the second challenge: ensuring that businesses have projects they want to fund. In the early years of this century, business investment held its own against residential investment in Canada. Not only did our capital stock grow, but the gap between non-residential investment in Canada and in other countries, including the United States, narrowed. Fostering confidence in Canada as an attractive place to invest – assuring businesses that today’s massive deficits do not prefigure higher taxes in the years ahead, for example – could get investment in non-housing capital to healthier levels. A strong housing sector provided a welcome boost when our COVID-weakened economy needed it. When housing reaches half of all business investment, however, we have too much of a good thing. House-rich is nice, but so are well-paying jobs for ourselves and our children, and to secure those we need business investment. Jeremy M. Kronick is associate director of research at the C. D. Howe Institute, where William B.P. Robson is CEO.

Share this article in your social network

In-depth reporting on the innovation economy from The Logic, brought to you in partnership with the Financial Post.

Top Stories Newsletter Sign up to receive the daily top stories from the Financial Post, a division of Postmedia Network Inc. Email Address There was an error, please provide a valid email address. By clicking on the sign up button you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. You may unsubscribe any time by clicking on the unsubscribe link at the bottom of our emails. Postmedia Network Inc. | 365 Bloor Street East, Toronto, Ontario, M4W 3L4 | 416-383-2300 Thanks for signing up! A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it please check your junk folder. The next issue of Top Stories Newsletter will soon be in your inbox. We encountered an issue signing you up. Please try again

VonD0OM on March 24th, 2021 at 13:17 UTC »

My dads talking about taking his tiny little broken down bungalo,that he bought barely 10 years ago for $400k, and is getting listing offers for up to $2mil

Like...wtf. I’m happy for him, but I’m fucked.

bewarethetreebadger on March 24th, 2021 at 12:45 UTC »

What’s this “becoming”? We’re already there.

legocastle77 on March 24th, 2021 at 11:27 UTC »

Too late. We’re already there.

Worse still, none of the major political parties will lift a finger to address this issue. There is no light at the end of this tunnel.