Biden says he supports reforming Senate filibuster in ABC News exclusive interview

Authored by abcnews.go.com and submitted by Jeffmister
image for Biden says he supports reforming Senate filibuster in ABC News exclusive interview

He told George Stephanopoulos he wants to return to the "talking filibuster."

President Joe Biden on Tuesday said he supports changing the Senate’s filibuster rule back to requiring senators talk on the floor to hold up a bill, the first time he has endorsed reforming the procedure the White House has for weeks insisted the president is opposed to eliminating.

The comments, made in an exclusive interview with ABC News' George Stephanopoulos, could galvanize reform advocates who argue that the legislative filibuster is stymying Biden's agenda in the narrowly divided Senate.

"Aren't you going to have to choose between preserving the filibuster, and advancing your agenda?" Stephanopoulos asked Biden in their interview outside Philadelphia.

"Yes, but here's the choice: I don't think that you have to eliminate the filibuster, you have to do it what it used to be when I first got to the Senate back in the old days," Biden said. "You had to stand up and command the floor, you had to keep talking."

"So you're for that reform? You're for bringing back the talking filibuster?" Stephanopulos asked.

"I am. That's what it was supposed to be," Biden said.

"It's getting to the point where, you know, democracy is having a hard time functioning," Biden told Stephanopoulos.

As recently as Tuesday, White House press secretary Jen Psaki insisted that Biden preferred "not to make changes" to the filibuster but was "open to hearing" ideas on the topic.

Currently, 60 votes are needed in the Senate to end debate and pass legislation, a threshold that requires Democrats to have the support of at least 10 Republicans to advance bills through the 50-50 Senate.

Many Democrats, worried that the filibuster could hold up major agenda items such as voting rights and immigration reform, have pressured Democrats to use their majority to eliminate the filibuster or alter the rules. One proposal referenced by Biden on Tuesday, would revert back to the "talking filibuster" used decades ago that required senators to speak on the Senate floor to sustain a challenge to legislation.

While moderate Democratic Sens. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., and Kyrsten Sinema, D-Ariz., have objected to changing the filibuster, Manchin recently raised the possibility of making the tactic more "painful" for Republicans – a comment seized on by the reform advocates.

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., on Tuesday warned Democrats against changing the legislative filibuster.

"This chaos would not open up an express lane to liberal change. It would not open up an express lane for the Biden presidency to speed into the history books," he said. "The Senate would be more like a hundred-car pile-up. Nothing moving."

McConnell said Republicans would take advantage of any rule changes the next time they retained the Senate majority.

"This pendulum would swing both ways — hard," he said.

Watch more of the interview with President Joe Biden on ABC's "Good Morning America" on Wednesday, March 17, at 7 a.m. EDT.

kuwabara_has_a_sword on March 17th, 2021 at 02:25 UTC »

Mitch and Susan's whining must mean that there is enough support to reform the filibuster and that it will happen soon.

whileoceaniasleeps on March 17th, 2021 at 01:05 UTC »

Even reforming the filibuster to actually give it some cost to use would mean a lot. In its current state it’s as simple as the minority sending an email threat that they may filibuster to hold a vote captive. There’s no skin in the game, no cost benefit analysis involved. It’s just cheap and easy for them to throw around at virtually everything.

They should have to stand up on the floor and talk in order to capture the session and delay. No hiding, make their opposition known and explain their arguments in detail. Even more than that, I’m warming up to the idea that they should have to assemble a threshold of 40 votes to be present to extend the filibuster, rather than triggering it with a simple threat and requiring 60 votes to break it. Flip it around and put the onus on those who want to use it; if they cannot muster 40 votes to continue filibustering then debate ends, cloture is invoked, and the bill passes with a simple majority. It should be there to give the minority a voice and for them to invoke on extraordinary occasions, not to lazily make threats with no discretion and no cost that control the legislative agenda.

Custergrant on March 17th, 2021 at 00:43 UTC »

After Mitch's fucking temper tantrum today, I'm looking forward to his meltdown tomorrow.