Democrat Abrams urges lifting filibuster for U.S. election reform bill

Authored by reuters.com and submitted by fk4cyl
image for Democrat Abrams urges lifting filibuster for U.S. election reform bill

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Stacey Abrams, an influential figure in Democratic circles, called on Sunday for the U.S. Senate to exempt election reform legislation passed by the House of Representatives over Republican opposition from a procedural hurdle called the filibuster.

“Protection of democracy is so fundamental that it should be exempt from the filibuster rules,” Abrams, a former senior state legislator and unsuccessful gubernatorial candidate in Georgia who helped Democrats win two U.S. Senate runoff elections in her home state in January, told CNN’s “State of the Union” program.

The Democratic-led House on March 3 passed a bill intended to reform voting procedures, increase voter participation and require states to assign independent commissions the task of redrawing congressional districts to guard against partisan manipulation.

There is a debate among Democrats, who narrowly control the Senate thanks to the two Georgia victories, on whether to modify or even eliminate the filibuster, a longstanding fixture that makes it so most legislation cannot advance without 60 votes in the 100-seat Senate rather than a simple majority.

The filibuster already has been scaled back and does not apply to judicial or Cabinet appointments and some budgetary measures, Abrams noted, so it should be suspended for the voting rights legislation. Abrams, a former minority leader in the Georgia House of Representatives, has emerged as a leading Democratic voice on voting rights.

Democratic President Joe Biden has said he would sign the election legislation into law if it is passed by Congress, but also has indicated opposition to completely eliminating the filibuster.

The House-passed bill faces long odds in the Senate under current rules, where all 48 Democrats and the two independents who caucus with them would need to be joined by 10 of the 50 Republican senators to overcome a filibuster.

Democrats have argued that the legislation is necessary to lower barriers to voting and to make the U.S. political system more democratic and responsive to the needs of voters. Republicans have said it would take powers away from the states, and have promised to fight it if it becomes law.

Texas Governor Greg Abbott noted that he repeatedly sued Democratic former President Barack Obama’s administration over various policies when he was the Texas attorney general. Abbott said would not hesitate now to file a legal challenge against the election measure if it is passed and Biden signs it.

“The strongest tool that we have is the litigation tool,” Abbott said on the Fox News “Sunday Morning Futures” program.

Speaking on the same program, U.S. Senator John Cornyn of Texas added: “We’ll fight this in the Senate and we’ll fight this in the courts, if necessary.”

There was record turnout in the 2020 election, helped by mail-in ballots heavily used by Democratic voters amid the COVID-19 pandemic.

Democrats have accused Republicans at the state level of pursuing voter suppression laws for partisan advantage. Former President Donald Trump made false claims that the 2020 election was stolen from him though widespread voting fraud and irregularities. Since then, Republicans have introduced measures in numerous state legislatures that would limit voting access.

A bill passed by the Republican-controlled Georgia House this month, for example, would restrict ballot drop boxes, tighten absentee voting requirements and limit early voting on Sundays, curtailing traditional “Souls to the Polls” voter turnout programs in Black churches.

Mrorange002 on March 14th, 2021 at 17:37 UTC »

Voting rights is the hill that the filibuster should die on

clamdever on March 14th, 2021 at 16:19 UTC »

If I was a Democrat leader I'd listen to when this lady speaks.

easyone on March 14th, 2021 at 15:56 UTC »

Stacey Abrams Just Used The Constitution To Burn The Filibuster To The Ground

Stacey Abrams explained to Democrats and everyone else why Senate Democrats have the constitutional power to exempt voting rights bills from the filibuster.

I don’t think it’s necessary to wholly eliminate the filibuster to accomplish the purposes of passing these bills. The Elections Clause in the Constitution guarantees that the congress alone has the power to regulate the time, manner, and place of elections. That is a power that is sacrosanct.

It is not complicated. Democrats can keep the filibuster, but exempt voting rights bills from it. Moderates like Joe Manchin have already signaled that they support changing the rules but not gutting the filibuster.

Schumer wants to set the trap and prove to his caucus that Republicans will never work with them, so expect some legislation to placed on the Senate floor that Republicans will filibuster because Democrats know that the filibuster has got to be changed.

Racism is all about getting past this immediate crisis (whatever it happens to be today). Elected Democrats need to work for the long term and since the thugs have nothing to provide in terms of ... well anything there will never be any organized opposition or compromise offered.

[edit add - basis for a filibuster is skimpy for a reason] If the only argument against a proposal is to shout 'STOP' and 'NO - NEVER' you might need to retire in favor of someone that has actual ideas; or would be willing to suggest something else - but only if you will subsequently support that merger of ideas. Historically the thugs and racists can't and won't so no need to even consider them.