Alabama House Votes to Overturn Ban on Yoga in Schools – But ‘Namaste’ Is Still Forbidden

Authored by time.com and submitted by Dooraven

(MONTGOMERY, Ala.) — A decades-old ban on yoga in Alabama public schools could be coming to an end.

The Alabama House of Representatives voted 73-25 to approve a bill that will authorize school systems to decide if they want yoga to be allowed in K-12 schools. The bill now moves to the Alabama Senate.

Yoga done in school would be limited to poses and stretches. The bill says the use of chanting, mantras and teaching the greeting “namaste” would be forbidden.

The Alabama Board of Education voted in 1993 to prohibit yoga, hypnosis and meditation in public school classrooms. The ban was pushed by conservative groups.

Democratic Rep. Jeremy Gray of Opelika sponsored the bill. He said he understood some gym teachers had been teaching yoga in class before they realized it was banned, and others wanted to offer it, particularly during virtual learning.

Gray, a former cornerback at North Carolina State University, said he was introduced to yoga through football, and that the exercises can provide mental and physical benefits to students.

“I’ve been in yoga for seven years. I know the benefits of yoga, so it was very dear to my heart, and I think Alabama will be better for it,” Gray said.

Under the bill, the moves and exercises taught to students must have exclusively English names. Gray said students would also have the option to not participate and instead do an alternative activity.

The 1993 Alabama yoga ban got new attention in 2018 when an old document circulated listing yoga — along with games like tag — among inappropriate activities in gym class.

Twenty-five representatives in the 105-member House voted against the bill. Gray said some House members said they, “got a lot emails about it being part of Hinduism.”

“Some people’s minds you can never change. If you have to vote your district, I understand it,” Gray said.

Get The Brief. Sign up to receive the top stories you need to know right now. Please enter a valid email address. * The request timed out and you did not successfully sign up. Please attempt to sign up again. Sign Up Now An unexpected error has occurred with your sign up. Please try again later. Check the box if you do not wish to receive promotional offers via email from TIME. You can unsubscribe at any time. By signing up you are agreeing to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. Thank you! For your security, we've sent a confirmation email to the address you entered. Click the link to confirm your subscription and begin receiving our newsletters. If you don't get the confirmation within 10 minutes, please check your spam folder.

yahutee on March 12nd, 2021 at 14:32 UTC »

Under the bill, the moves and exercises taught to students must have exclusively English names

*rolls eyes into back of head

new_old_mike on March 12nd, 2021 at 13:42 UTC »

"You going to school today?"

"Namaste home and fuck my cousin."

Sovereign42 on March 12nd, 2021 at 13:06 UTC »

They claim that its because there are laws prohibiting the promotion of religion by school staff or faculty (which is technically true), and yoga and certain phrases associated with it are technically a part of hindu tradition, and therefore a religious practice, so I can at least understand WHY an otherwise sane person might take issue.

BUT HERE'S THE THING, Alabama state law also includes an article which MANDATES a one minute long period of "quiet reflection" for all students, during which they may pray or just be quiet. (16-1-20.4). This wouldn't be sooo bad, except that the law expressly allows teachers to lead their classrooms in a prayer to "the lord god", a prayer which the law lays out in exacting detail (16-1-20.2).

I mean, I know anyone reading this already understands the hypocrisy inherent in Albama's standards for religious protection, but I wanted to provide the direct evidence, in case anyone was interested.

EDIT: Wow guys thanks for the big response, both positive and negative (I love the discussion!). I have been informed, however that statute 16-1-20 was actually the subject of debate back in 1981, ultimately the statute was ruled unconstitutional in 1985 in the case Wallace v. Jaffree. I apologize for my less than perfect research. Though, if the responses from some of you is any indication, there may very well be some classrooms that are still upholding the "tradition" of the required minute of silence.

I'm glad this got so many of you interested in learning more about state laws and how messed up they can be. Especially with how state politics has been going lately.