House Democrats introducing bill to limit transfer of military-grade gear to police

Authored by thehill.com and submitted by Madhavaz
image for House Democrats introducing bill to limit transfer of military-grade gear to police

Dozens of House lawmakers are reintroducing a bill Tuesday to limit the Pentagon program that sends military-grade equipment to local police departments.

The bill, sponsored by Rep. Hank Johnson Henry (Hank) C. JohnsonNAACP, Rep. Bennie Thompson sue Trump, Giuliani over Capitol riot House Judiciary Democrats ask Pence to invoke 25th Amendment to remove Trump Five things to watch during Electoral College battle MORE (D-Ga.), “goes after the items that destroy trust and endanger communities while allowing support equipment transfers to continue,” a summary shared with The Hill said.

“Our neighborhoods need to be protected, but Americans and our founding fathers opposed blurring the line between police and the military,” Johnson said in a statement Tuesday. “Before another town is transformed into a warzone with gifts of grenade launchers and high-caliber rifles, we must rein in this program and revisit our view of the safety of American cities and towns.”

The bill is co-sponsored by co-sponsored by 73 other House Democrats and one Republican, Rep. Tom McClintock Thomas (Tom) Milller McClintockRepublicans call for hearing on Biden's handling of border surge Bipartisan resolution supports Iranian public amid Biden push to reenter nuclear deal An attack on America that's divided Congress — and a nation MORE (Calif.).

The bill mirrors language that was included in a sweeping police reform bill the House passed last week. But that legislation, dubbed the George Floyd Justice in Policing Act, faces an uphill battle in getting the 60 votes needed to pass a Senate with a 50-50 party divide.

Lawmakers are reintroducing the standalone bill to tackle the Pentagon program in hopes of building momentum to include it in the annual defense policy bill, said Yasmine Taeb, a human rights lawyer and activist supporting the bill. The National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) is one of the few bills that reliably becomes law each year, so is often a lightning rod for hot-button issues.

At issue is what’s known as the 1033 program, which allows the Pentagon to transfer excess military equipment to U.S. police departments.

Attention on the program was renewed last year amid the nationwide protests over police violence and racial injustice sparked by George Floyd’s death in Minneapolis police custody.

Former President Obama curtailed the 1033 program in 2015 after local police suppressed protests in Ferguson, Mo., using military-grade equipment. But the Trump administration rescinded the restrictions in 2017.

President Biden Joe BidenCNN: Bidens' dogs removed from the White House Federal judge rules 'QAnon shaman' too dangerous to be released from jail Pelosi says Capitol riot was one of the most difficult moments of her career MORE has been expected to issue an executive order reimposing limits on the program.

Johnson’s bill could put pressure on Biden for what to include in an executive order. In addition, House members are expected to send Biden a letter later this week calling on him to issue an executive order to “end the transfer of military-grade weaponry through the Pentagon’s 1033 program onto the streets of our communities,” Taeb said.

Last year’s NDAA included language aimed at limiting the program by blocking the transfer of bayonets, grenades, weaponized tracked combat vehicles and weaponized drones, as well as requiring law enforcement getting equipment to be trained in de-escalation and citizens' constitutional rights.

But the language that made it into the NDAA, which became law over former President Trump Donald TrumpTrump vows 'No more money for RINOS,' instead encouraging donations to his PAC Federal judge rules 'QAnon shaman' too dangerous to be released from jail Pelosi says Capitol riot was one of the most difficult moments of her career MORE’s veto, did not go as far as Democrats and advocates wanted.

Johnson’s bill would place much broader restrictions on the program. Specifically, the bill would prohibit the Pentagon from sending police departments controlled firearms, ammunition, bayonets, grenade launchers, grenades, including stun and flash-bang grenades, explosives, certain controlled vehicles including mine-resistant vehicles, armored or weaponized drones, combat-configured or combat-coded aircraft, silencers and long-range acoustic devices, according to the bill text.

It would also limit the reason the Pentagon can approve a transfer to counterterrorism. Right now, equipment can also be transferred for counter-drug, disaster-related emergency preparedness and border security activities.

And it would require new certifications to Congress from the Pentagon accounting for equipment that has been transferred, as well as place new requirements on local police departments to notify the public it is seeking the equipment and get local government approval.

dylanatstrumble on March 9th, 2021 at 16:26 UTC »

As the military does not want the stuff, I always suspected this was a scam by politicians to ensure that the arms suppliers could keep turning out stuff that was made in their state or area to keep voters sweet

ShowMeYourMortys on March 9th, 2021 at 15:11 UTC »

I live in a town with roughly 10k population. "small town usa". Why does my police department need an armored humvee? I can't think of a good reason either.. yet they still have it.

clueless_in_ny_or_nj on March 9th, 2021 at 14:56 UTC »

This is something that never should have happened in the first place. I can't wait when mall security is wearing full tactical armor because they need to send the gear somewhere.