Farmers ask for 'right to repair'

Authored by dailyherald.com and submitted by speckz
image for Farmers ask for 'right to repair'

Farmers ask for 'right to repair'

Farmers advocates say John Deere and other equipment manufacturers have monopoly on repairs. Associated Press file photo

SPRINGFIELD -- Legislation backed by the U.S. Public Interest Research Group would require farming equipment manufacturers to make software required for repairs available to consumers for purchase.

House Bill 3061, introduced as the "Digital Right to Repair Act" in February by Democratic Rep. Michelle Mussman of Schaumburg, would mandate that manufacturers, by 2022, provide farmers with the same diagnostic materials available to official repair providers. It would also require the manufacturers to make parts necessary for repair, including software, available for purchase.

The legislation comes after the release of a report by the U.S. Public Interest Research Group that alleges farmers are unable to sufficiently repair tractors purchased from John Deere and other manufacturers because they withhold the software necessary to do so.

"The Association of Equipment Manufacturers, of which John Deere is a prominent member, promised that by 2021, they would give farmers the necessary tools to fix their machinery. However, Deere has fallen short of that commitment, so farmers -- and all Americans, who rely on them to produce food -- are worse off," advocate Kevin O'Reilly said in a release announcing the report.

The report says for countless generations farmers have been able to independently repair equipment once purchased from manufacturers, but new developments in technology have shifted the status quo to disadvantage farmers. Unable to make repairs themselves, farmers are required to take equipment back to the dealership or associated repair facilities, "leading to delays of hours to weeks."

"Without the software tools needed to diagnose problems, install replacement parts and authorize repairs, the engagement or failure of any sensor or control system forces a farmer to either haul their machine into the nearest dealership or wait for a field technician to arrive to complete the repair," the report reads.

The report also claims that sensors and controller networks, which have become necessary for tractors and combine harvesters to function, are the highest points of failure on farming machinery as opposed to hardware damage that can be fixed by the farmer.

According to U.S. PIRG, this is intentional to give manufacturers a repair monopoly. Their evidence is the lucrative nature of the repair industry. From 2013 to 2019, John Deere's annual sales of parts rose to $6.7 billion, a 22% increase, while its annual sales of equipment fell by 19% to $23.7 billion.

Manufacturers have opposed providing the software on several grounds. They say it could jeopardize proprietary information and lead to the theft of trade secrets tied to programming. Giving farmers access to repair software could also allow them to make illegal modifications to their equipment, potentially leading to some farmers overriding safety and environmental controls placed in the vehicle software.

The Digital Right to Repair Act, which awaits assignment to a substantial committee in the House, includes a provision that prevents the legislation from being made "to require an original equipment manufacturer to divulge a trade secret ... except as necessary to provide documentation, parts, and tools on fair and reasonable terms."

Farming groups have increased their pressure on manufacturers to concede the right to repair, using the threat of legislation to reach an agreement.

According to the Minneapolis Star Tribune, the American Farm Bureau Federation voted in 2020 to throw its weight behind right-to-repair legislation if manufacturers didn't reach an agreement with farmers and independent repair contractors by 2021.

Twenty other states are considering bills mandating the right to repair.

apatheticus on March 5th, 2021 at 17:18 UTC »

My farmer friend told me about his troubles with newer machinery back in 2015. Something goes wrong with a part on his sprayer. Well, that means the rest of it starts having a fit and the computer won't let you do anything else. You try to disconnect the part that's not working and just use the other side of the sprayer that's not jammed, but no you can't do that because the computer thinks that a part is missing. So then you call John Deere and it's $500 or something like that just for someone to come to your farm to look at the machine.

He tells you, "Yup, you're gonna need that part... It's actually just a computer sensor that's gone wonky. It'll be 2k for the sensor and 3k for the labour. Plus you can't use the machine for a week or 3 until I get you all fixed up. And don't go fixing this yourself or you'll void the warranty."

"Well why are you charging me if it's under warranty?"

"Oh the warranty doesn't cover this."

My buddy doesn't use that side of the sprayer anymore and found a way to rig it.

SpaceChevalier on March 5th, 2021 at 16:36 UTC »

This is why Farm equipment from the 80s/90s (pre DRM) is selling for basically as much as new equipment. Farmers would much rather buy a 30-40 year old piece of equipment they can service than something that requires a 10k-100k a year maintenance contract.

steelhouse1 on March 5th, 2021 at 16:07 UTC »

Try fixing a bobcat. You are forced to have a tech either come onsite or bring the equipment to a dealer for repairs.