Georgia considering “a panel of three physicians” to evaluate girls’ genitals for school sports

Authored by lgbtqnation.com and submitted by relevantlife
image for Georgia considering “a panel of three physicians” to evaluate girls’ genitals for school sports

A new bill being considered in Georgia’s legislature would create “a panel of three physicians” to examine the “reproductive organs” and “genetic makeup” of girls in an effort to ban transgender girls from participating in school sports.

A proposed bill introduced in the Georgia House of Representatives earlier this month called for banning transgender girls from participating in sports. Critics and legal experts believed the proposal would be found as illegal if introduced into law, just like a similarly-written law in Idaho from last year, which is currently blocked by a federal injunction.

Related: We’re talking about attacks on trans athletes on the latest episode of LGBTQ Nation’s podcast

So another proposal was introduced this week by other state legislators that went even further. House Bill 372 would redefine gender as “a person’s biological sex at birth” in state law, require state-funded schools and associations to ban participants they deem not “biologically” male or female from sports, and calls for a panel to examine information about the genitalia or chromosomes of any participant who petitions otherwise.

State Rep. Philip Singleton (R) introduced House Bill 276 on February 3. It would have made the state the seventeenth in the nation to consider a bill that would ban transgender girls and women from competing in school sports as their gender.

Singleton’s proposal is still in committee, but it was lampooned by LGBTQ advocates and legal experts weren’t sure it would withstand in court. The Georgia School Boards Association’s director of policy Angela Palm wrote in an email to committee members that it would go against Title IX federal discrimination law, in addition to President Joe Biden’s executive order against LGBTQ discrimination.

Palm also noted that House Bill 276 included a provision waiving the state’s immunity to allow anyone “who is deprived of an athletic opportunity” by a school or athletic association to sue the organization in addition to the state’s board of regents. That would put school districts in “a no-win situation” in both state and federal courts, her email reportedly explained.

“We think it would be a big waste of government resources,” Jennifer Pizer of Lambda Legal told the Georgia Recorder.

So state Rep. Rick Jasperse (R) introduced House Bill 372 on February 9. It also excludes trans girls and women from participating in school-based sports or athletic organizations and bans anyone who isn’t a cisgender male or female.

Furthermore, the bill allows for students to “petition” for the right to participate in sports. The petitions, however, “shall include, at a minimum, information regarding the student’s gender based on the student’s reproductive organs, genetic makeup, and other medically relevant factors,” the bill states. The petition will then be subject to “a panel of three physicians to review… and make recommendations to the athletic association.”

It also includes a provision granting protections for any “ordinarily reasonably prudent” actions by the physicians involved: “no physician acting in a voluntary capacity shall be liable for civil damages or subject to disciplinary action under professional licensing regulations as a result of the activities authorized or required by this Code section….”

State Rep. Matthew Wilson (D) said, “This isn’t about protecting girls’ sports. It’s about scapegoating trans Georgians, and it won’t stand.”

House Bill 372 is co-sponsored by Rep. Ginny Ehrhart (R), who has introduced anti-trans copycat bills before, in addition to Reps. Jason Ridley (R), Mike Cameron (R), Rick Williams (R), and Steve Tarvin (R). It remains before the consideration of the Education committee.

This adds yet another bill to the previous 30-plus introduced in 20 states that targeted trans people, mostly banning their ability to play in sports or receive gender-affirming care.

After Idaho passed a law banning trans girls and women from participating in sports last year, several Republicans — and former Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-HI) — have chased similar proposals at the local, state and federal levels. A lawsuit is before federal judges challenging the ban, which has been prevented from taking place by federal injunction.

Legislation in Georgia introduced to create genitalia assessment boards to investigate student athletes’ reproductive organs, secondary sex characteristics, and chromosomes to enforce sex segregated sports in violation of federal law. #gapol h/t @mwilsonGA https://t.co/4cTZKOayQr — Anthony Michael Kreis (@AnthonyMKreis) February 10, 2021

A bill filed today includes *gender review panels* and unconstitutionally defines gender as assigned sex at birth. This isn't about protecting girls' sports. It's about scapegoating trans Georgians, and it won't stand. 🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈https://t.co/wZ69TGTBLE — Matthew Wilson (@mwilsonGA) February 10, 2021

The discriminatory bills HB 276 and HB 372 proposed by the Georgia GOP seek to deny transgender student athletes the opportunity to pursue their potential alongside their peers, all to solve a problem that does not exist. 1/ — Fair Fight (@fairfightaction) February 12, 2021

Truly what is this dystopian hellscape we are living in. Three physicians are going to review young women’s anatomy to decide who can play sports? GA HB 372 https://t.co/MvETnphDPH pic.twitter.com/eevGxRr3xG — Chase Strangio (@chasestrangio) February 12, 2021

r0sst0ph3r on February 15th, 2021 at 21:17 UTC »

In other news, GA is considering a panel of 3 catholic priests to evaluate the gender for boys sports.

mountrich on February 15th, 2021 at 20:40 UTC »

Gee, no golden opportunities for pedo's with this proposal. I wasn't aware that there were that many pre-op transgender females trying to join sports teams to make this an issue.

jello-kittu on February 15th, 2021 at 19:57 UTC »

Yeah, don't let our 2 blue senators and the election let you think the state is the same- entire executive branch, and around 60% of legislature is GOP, and stuff like this gets proposed a lot. Whether they bother trying to pass it, for judicial branch to shut down, will be the question. I assume the legislature/local GOP feel the need to flex their majority.