Murkowski says it would be 'appropriate' to bar Trump from holding office again

Authored by thehill.com and submitted by Gina_Bina
image for Murkowski says it would be 'appropriate' to bar Trump from holding office again

Sen. Lisa Murkowski Lisa Ann MurkowskiMurkowski says it would be 'appropriate' to bar Trump from holding office again McConnell about to school Trump on political power for the last time Murkowski blasts Trump's election claims, calls House impeachment appropriate MORE (R-Alaska) said this week that she believes it would be "appropriate" to block President Trump Donald TrumpEx-Trump lawyer Cohen to pen forward for impeachment book Murkowski says it would be 'appropriate' to bar Trump from holding office again Man known as 'QAnon Shaman' asks Trump for pardon after storming Capitol MORE from holding future office adding she believes he has committed an impeachable offense.

Murkowski hasn't said if she will vote to convict Trump at the end of a Senate trial after a bipartisan coalition in the House impeached Trump for "willfully inciting violence against the Government of the United States."

"What I will tell you is that what I believe is that this president has committed an impeachable offense through his words on the sixth of January, and leading up to the sixth of January, when he was not honest to the American people about the election and the election results," Murkowski told KTUU, an Alaska TV station, on Wednesday.

She added that blocking Trump from holding federal office again would be "one of the most consequential actions that we could take" and would be "appropriate ... given what we have seen from his actions and his failure to uphold the Constitution.”

Trump has falsely claimed for weeks that the election was "rigged," and urged his supporters to march on the Capitol last week as Vice President Pence and lawmakers were counting the Electoral College votes. Rioters breached the building, suspending the proceedings and forcing lawmakers to evacuate the House and Senate chambers.

A spokesperson for Murkowski didn't immediately respond to a question about her comments.

It would take a two-thirds vote in the Senate to make Trump the first president to be convicted in an impeachment trial.

If that happens, soon-to-be Majority Leader Charles Schumer Chuck SchumerNikki Haley unveils PAC ahead of possible 2024 White House bid Trump calls for 'NO violence' amid concerns of threats around inauguration Amazon cites death threats in push to keep Parler offline MORE (D-N.Y.) has vowed that he will hold a second vote to block Trump from holding federal office again. That vote would only need a simple majority.

Some legal scholars have also argued Congress could block Trump from holding federal office again, regardless of the impeachment process, under the 14th Amendment because of language that states that no office holder will have engaged in “insurrection or rebellion" against the United States.

Schumer, however, has not publicly raised trying to block Trump from holding future office separately from a conviction in the Senate trial, which is not expected to start until after President-elect Joe Biden Joe BidenConfirmation hearing for Biden's DNI pick postponed Biden's Sunday inauguration rehearsal postponed due to security concerns: report Murkowski says it would be 'appropriate' to bar Trump from holding office again MORE is sworn in on Wednesday.

Murkowski is part of a coalition of GOP senators viewed as likely to vote to convict Trump, though she said both in Wednesday's interview and a statement on Thursday that she will listen to both sides make their arguments when the Senate sits as a jury. She will then decide how she will vote.

"When the Article of Impeachment comes to the Senate, I will follow the oath I made when sworn as a U.S. Senator. I will listen carefully and consider the arguments of both sides, and will then announce how I will vote," Murkowski said in a separate statement on Thursday.

whachoomean on January 15th, 2021 at 02:33 UTC »

It's absolutely incredible there are Republicans who have no problem with this manchild terrorist being president again.

WTF?

AskJayce on January 15th, 2021 at 02:33 UTC »

I'm honestly not concerned about Trump running 2024.

For one thing, he'll be drowning in litigations to the point where I expect him to be crushed by the weight. Same thing with debt.

And he's a senior whose mental health is declining as rapidly as his physical health. His lack of conscious dieting and exercising and habitual late-night RAGE tweetings are not doing him any favors. And, again, he'll be neck-deep in lawsuits and debt so there's the stress of that.

I'm more concerned about his successor--whomever his idiot base will turn to in 2024. Convicting Trump will set the precedent that anyone who aspires to be POTUS cannot get away with undermining our democracy.

knave225 on January 15th, 2021 at 02:25 UTC »

Remember when she said she wasn't going to vote for Amy Coney Barrett? I 'memba