Intergenerational mobility in the very long run: Florence 1427-2011

Authored by restud.com and submitted by A-Dumb-Ass

We examine intergenerational mobility in the very long run, across generations that are six centuries apart. We exploit a unique dataset containing detailed information at the individual level for all people living in the Italian city of Florence in 1427. These individuals have been associated, using their surnames, with their pseudo-descendants living in Florence in 2011. We find that long-run earnings elasticity is about 0.04; we also find an even stronger role for real wealth inheritance and evidence of persistence in belonging to certain elite occupations. Our results are confirmed when we account for the quality of the pseudo-links and when we address the potential selectivity bias behind the matching process. Finally, we frame our results within the existing evidence and argue that the quasi-immobility of preindustrial society and the existence of multigenerational effects might explain the long-lasting effects of ancestors’ socioeconomic status.

bluestreakxp on January 9th, 2021 at 05:54 UTC »

My ancestor was a royal prince but he ran away from his family and decided to live with the people. Thanks a lot gramps.

Boredeidanmark on January 9th, 2021 at 01:46 UTC »

Hard to assess without access to the article.

But the article only looks at one city in the world - Florence. It’s mildly interesting, but I wouldn’t even say you can draw conclusions about Italy as a whole from this, much less all of Europe, much less all of the world.

tilt-a-whirly-gig on January 9th, 2021 at 00:48 UTC »

Without reading much more than the abstract, I wonder how you get a sample population of people with 600 yr family histories available. It seems that it would be easier to describe a family history if the family is not mobile. Families that had emigration would be more difficult to trace.

Could this introduce a bias?

Edit: this blew up while I slept. Lots of replies. A number of them mention how they have traced their family back 15+ generations. I would like to ask, does this mean you can name all 32768 of your great13 grandparents?