Mitch McConnell Using Section 230 Repeal As A Poison Pill To Avoid $2k Stimulus Checks

Authored by techdirt.com and submitted by byParallax

Mitch McConnell Using Section 230 Repeal As A Poison Pill To Avoid $2k Stimulus Checks

As you likely know by now, President Trump is trying to use his last few weeks in office to use various levers of power remaining to him to make sure he fucks up the open internet. However, he also threw a wrench in the works of the long-overdue and way too small COVID relief package by saying that the checks to individuals should be $2,000 rather than $600. He's not wrong, but it was bizarre that his own White House was part of the negotiations that made sure the checks were smaller. It's almost as if the President and his own administration don't communicate very much.

House Democrats took up the cause, and pushed for the $2,000, and many House Republicans went along with it, recognizing how popular an idea this was. The problem, of course, is that Mitch McConnell has absolutely no interest in this at all. Earlier today, Mitch McConnell blocked the motion to vote on increasing the checks to $2,000. Afterwards, he announced, in the most awkward language possible, that he wants to link the raised stimulus to... Section 230 repeal and the made-up issue of "election fraud."

McConnell on CHECKS, SECT. 230, ELECTION FRAUD: "Those are the three important subjects the President has linked together. This week the Senate will begin a process to bring these three priorities into focus."

It's not difficult to figure out what's actually happening here. McConnell does not want the larger checks going out. He's spent months trying to limit the size of any stimulus plan. So, his plan now is to "link" the issue to things that he knows will not pass in an actual vote. Basically, Section 230 (and the made up issue of election fraud) are poison pills to kill the stimulus plan.

This is horrific on both sides of the equation: using Section 230 and the open internet as a pawn in this game, and his resistance to actually putting together a stimulus plan that helps Americans who have suffered from their own government's total mismanagement of the pandemic. It's difficult not to be cynical about politics when you have people like Mitch McConnell pulling the strings.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community. Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis. While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

Filed Under: covid, donald trump, election fraud, mitch mcconnell, poison pill, section 230, stimulus

Mister_Squirrels on December 30th, 2020 at 01:43 UTC »

It’s insane that the vast majority of people want this, but one fucking guy says no, so we don’t get it.

I wish someone would put a tack on his chair or something. That’ll show em.

squiddlebiddlez on December 30th, 2020 at 00:55 UTC »

The $1200 stimulus cost about $250bn back in March and we have about $450bn leftover from the very same CARES act just sitting around.

I don’t know how to stress it more that these people have gone out of their way to make us suffer for absolutely no good reason.

StressedZoomer on December 29th, 2020 at 20:22 UTC »

People really do not understand what section 230 is. A blanket repeal of it without any replacement of a similar legal note would annihilate the internet and literally do the exact opposite of what those calling for its appeal believe.