The Daily Populous Friday November 27th, 2020 evening edition
Authored by lawandcrime.com and submitted by Twoweekswithpay

Instead of joining the rest of us in calmly enjoying turkey-and-stuffing sandwiches and reflecting on the joys of the holiday season, President Donald Trump is flipping out over the latest humiliating hashtag. His demand? If the internet can’t be nicer to him, let’s burn it all down.

The president’s latest tantrum appears to have been sparked by Thanksgiving Day pictures of him signing legislation behind a tiny desk.

May this be how we remember the Trump presidency: a baby at his tiny little desk throwing a tantrum pic.twitter.com/T26DjF1fL4 — Parker Molloy (@ParkerMolloy) November 27, 2020

Almost immediately, #DiaperDon started trending, and in poured all the jokes.

#BlackFridayDeals special My Little President Conference Table avaliable now in all good stores $19.99 *please note product easy wipe clean in case of Little President accidents #DiaperDon pic.twitter.com/XtS3dAPS6X — Charlie Hayes (@oxfcharlie) November 27, 2020

The president, though, wasn’t amused. Despite the fact that POTUS himself had joked in the past about the size of this particular desk, his response to Thursday’s trending mockery was to revert to demand that Section 230 be ended because “false ‘Trends'” were mocking him—a national security threat.

For purposes of National Security, Section 230 must be immediately terminated!!! — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 27, 2020

This is not the first time Trump has demanded a change federal communications law in response to Twitter mockery. For months, Trump and his supporters have made repeal of Section 230 a major talking point. After Facebook and Twitter began regularly removing and flagging Trump’s posts filled with inaccuracies and falsehoods—and even temporarily locking down the president’s account—he zeroed in on the internet platforms themselves as his primary enemy.

Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996 protects internet companies from legal liability for what users post on their platforms. Facebook and Twitter are platforms, not publishers. This means that the internet business themselves would not be held liable for defamation committed by a user.

The kind of shield offered by Section 230 is key to the lives of everything from Yelp to Facebook, and Instagram to Parler. Without it, platforms would need to police user content so closely that it would be impractical for them to survive. Despite these legal limitations on liability, most platforms do employ terms of service that require users to follow some guidelines—but those are internal rules, not ones imposed by the government. In other words, Twitter wouldn’t be legally liable for allowing Trump to share false information, like, say, a tweet claiming Joe Biden didn’t actually win the election.

Just saw the vote tabulations. There is NO WAY Biden got 80,000,000 votes!!! This was a 100% RIGGED ELECTION. — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 26, 2020

However, the platforms are well within their legal rights to impose certain restrictions on their users. They are private businesses and they set the rules for how consumers use their services. That’s why Twitter can shut down the president’s account, or flag some of his tweets as inaccurate.

President Trump has long struggled with distinguishing between private and public action, particularly in the context of the internet. Trump now appears to be trying his hand at predicting Twitter’s future, appearing to claim that the social media giant will decline in popularity because it isn’t sycophantic enough anymore.

Twitter is sending out totally false “Trends” that have absolutely nothing to do with what is really trending in the world. They make it up, and only negative “stuff”. Same thing will happen to Twitter as is happening to @FoxNews daytime. Also, big Conservative discrimination! — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 27, 2020

Others, though, have a different take on a world without Section 230.

If Section 230 is eliminated (ending liability protection for platforms over what people say on their platforms that may cause damage), as Republicans are demanding, the first thing platforms would do is ban Republican leadership because they regularly lie & incite violence. — David Rothschild (@DavMicRot) November 27, 2020

Can someone tell #DiaperDon that “terminating” Section 230 would prob get him kicked off Twitter? — Evan Greer (@evan_greer) November 27, 2020

Whatever logic may exist as to a hypothetical repeal or amendment of Section 230, the president’s assertion that the change must be done in the interest of “national security” is baffling. Twitter had something to say about that, too.

Yes, the president is proclaiming it a matter of national security for someone (I wonder who) to be able to sue a place like twitter when a user posts something he doesn’t like on it. Wow, #DiaperDon is tearing him up. And it also shows what he thinks “national security” means. pic.twitter.com/1JU9QgjaKv — Kurt “Masks Save Lives” Eichenwald (@kurteichenwald) November 27, 2020

If I am remembered for getting the hashtag #DiaperDon to force the president to declare Twitter trends a national security threat I will be totally okay with that — Brett Meiselas (@BMeiselas) November 27, 2020

Ready as ever to make important policy for the nation and invoke national security based on how he feels personally, in this case the fact that #DiaperDon is trending on Twitter. I wish I were making this up. pic.twitter.com/H5LZjy7gOb — Dow 30k (@mark_dow) November 27, 2020

HE’S SAYING THAT THE RUMOR THAT HE WEARS DIAPERS IS A NATIONAL SECURITY THREAT. — Jules Suzdaltsev (@jules_su) November 27, 2020

Others were particularly bothered by the timing of Trump’s invocation of “national security,” coming so shortly after his pardon for former national security advisor Michael Flynn.

The traitor Mike Flynn cooperated with the Russian Intelligence Services receives a pardon, and #DiaperDon thinks it’s not National Security problem, and hashtag #DiaperDon thinks it’s National Security issue because it hurts his childish ego. — Kareem Sheriff (@waters357) November 27, 2020

Michael Flynn was a National Security threat and you just pardoned him so don’t use it as a pretext for being pissed about #DiaperDon — Richard Uhlmann (@RichardUhlmann) November 27, 2020

This is an opinion piece. The views expressed in this article are those of just the author.

alwaysmyfault on November 27th, 2020 at 16:42 UTC »

I think people are missing the big thing here.

Trump always rages, but the things that make him REALLY rage are when people say the truth, and he's embarrassed about it.

In this case, the #Diaperdon stuff.

In his mind, he's probably thinking "WTF, how did they know I wear adult diapers?!?! I'll show them! I'll shut down the internet!"

liquidgrill on November 27th, 2020 at 15:47 UTC »

There has been at least on former Apprentice staffer who has claimed that Donny wore an adult diaper. I think this one hit a little too close to home.

DonnieMostDefinitely on November 27th, 2020 at 15:44 UTC »

I can't stop laughing at this. Guy wakes up in the middle of the night to have his normal midnight fast food dump and logs on Twitter. Sees #diaperdon trending and gets so furious. Like extremely angry. No way he's getting back to sleep now. He's the president and they still mock him. How did one man become so impotent? And he does what all impotent men do, scream and rage and make empty threats. God January can't come soon enough.