Killing the golden goose: How Australia's international students are being driven away

Authored by abc.net.au and submitted by Nobarsgo
image for Killing the golden goose: How Australia's international students are being driven away

International student visa applications from outside Australia have dropped off a cliff, raising serious concerns of an increasing budget black hole for Australian higher education.

Key points: Just 4,062 student visa applications were received in June, compared to 34,015 last year

Just 4,062 student visa applications were received in June, compared to 34,015 last year Current international students are telling others not to come to Australia

Current international students are telling others not to come to Australia Students say they were treated like cash cows, but deserted when they needed help

Just 72,397 student visa applications have been received from prospective overseas students from January to July, 40 per cent of the total for the same period last year, Department of Home Affairs data shows.

The drop-off became particularly acute from April, when Australia was well into its national shutdown.

In June, normally a peak month, applications were down 30,000 on the year before, with just 4,062 submitted from people currently overseas.

"It has just collapsed," said Peter Hurley from Victoria University's Mitchell Institute for Education and Health Policy.

"This is not just a university problem. International students spend much more in the economy than just on student fees, and so it has an effect on the entire economy when they aren't coming."

International education was worth $37.6 billion to the Australian economy last year, but continued border closures are putting that at risk.

Analysis from the Mitchell Institute forecast a $19 billion loss in student revenue over the next three years if the international borders remained closed until the end of 2021.

The National Tertiary Education Union estimates at least 12,500 jobs have already been lost in the sector this year, largely as a result of the loss of international student fees.

"We modelled what the impact would be and we had a good scenario and a bad scenario," Dr Hurley said.

"The bad is happening and is likely to get worse, because the longer those borders stay shut, the less likely we are going to get back those international students."

But an increasing body of evidence suggests it is not only the border closures that are turning international students off Australia, but also the way they have been treated during the pandemic.

Exploitation, racism and a lack of government support are all contributing to international students becoming disillusioned with Australia.

A survey released last month of more than 5,000 international students by the Migrants Workers Justice Initiative found 59 per cent of respondents were now less likely to recommend Australia as a study destination than before the pandemic.

Alarmingly, it was even higher in two key markets, with 76 per cent of Chinese students and 69 per cent of Nepalese students reporting being less likely to recommend Australia.

Racism towards international students was also rampant, with almost a quarter reporting being verbally racially abused, rising to more than half of Chinese respondents.

International students and other temporary migrants were denied Federal Government supports, including JobKeeper and JobSeeker, despite 70 per cent (according to the survey) losing hours or employment altogether.

According to co-author Associate Professor Laurie Berg of the Faculty of Law at the University of Technology Sydney, the Prime Minister's statement in April that students should "make their way home" if they could no longer support themselves was frequently cited by disillusioned respondents.

"Thousands expressed anger and distress at the Australian government and hundreds mentioned the PM's statement specifically," she said.

In all, 35 per cent of respondents said they would run out of funds by October, and a third said they had to seek emergency support to meet their basic needs.

That was the case for masters student at LaTrobe University, Swapna Karanam.

She lost her job as a waitress at the start of the pandemic and has been relying on food from charities and her local council to survive.

Ms Karanam estimates she can hold on until the end of the year. ( Supplied )

"Several NGOs helped me, giving me food and food vouchers to buy groceries," she said.

"Coming to rent, for two months I used my savings, and after one month I applied for grants."

The manufacturing engineering student has just received a Victorian Government rent relief grant worth up to $3,000, which will help her get to the end of the academic year.

Her flatmate, Abhishek Chevella, who is doing the same course, was lucky enough to keep his job, but his hours as an overnight paper deliverer have been reduced.

For months, he has been barely scraping by earning $350 to $400 week, of which $70 goes straight to petrol costs for his delivery job.

"This $400 is not enough for me for rent, bills and maintenance," he said.

Mr Chevella feels let down by Australia and says because of his treatment during the pandemic he will tell his friends to go elsewhere.

"I'm sorry, I can't recommend they come to Australia to study," he said.

Dr Berg said for years international students had been treated as cash cows, yet often faced exploitation by employers and financial hardship even before the pandemic.

"Many felt like they are treated purely as a revenue stream and then having been abandoned when they themselves were in need," she said.

"I think there is a bit of a myth that international student are wealthy," he said.

"Some are wealthy, but many don't have huge means behind them."

Mr Chevella's experience was far from the glowing image of Australia the glossy education brochures promise, even before the pandemic.

Mr Chevella says he wouldn't recommend other students come to Australia. ( Supplied )

He borrowed more than $50,000 to study in Australia, after an education consultant in India convinced him to ditch the significantly cheaper course to which he'd already been accepted in the UK.

"Every consultant in Hyderabad I visited said Australia would be best, that I could work part time and pay back my fees," he said.

But when he got here, the situation was very different.

Mr Chevella said he had worked in five restaurants where he had been underpaid, including one where he was paid $70 for six-and-a-half hour shifts.

Since his hours working as a paper deliverer were cut during the pandemic, he has been unable to pay back the loan to his bank in India, which is charging 13 per cent interest.

Although the bank has been accommodating, his next lot of university fees is now due, and the bank won't release further money until he starts to pay down some of his existing loan.

The decision to not extend payments to students has been labelled "short-sighted". ( Unsplash: Nathan Dumlao )

Mr Chevella doesn't feel that the education was worth it, as his course is going over material already covered in his bachelor's degree.

"The cost of living we can't afford, with the rule of only being able to work 20 hours a week, and the exploitation and the stress, it's a very big issue for students," he said.

"So I don't recommend them [prospective students] to come here.

"Instead, they can go to the UK for a much less fee."

The Federal Government said extending JobKeeper and JobSeeker to people on temporary visas, including international students, would have cost a further $20 billion.

However, Dr Berg said the decision not to had cost Australia's reputation as a good place to study.

"It was a short-sighted economic decision and one that was not taken by other countries and other similar education markets, like the UK and Canada and Ireland," she said.

2seconds2midnight on October 4th, 2020 at 23:50 UTC »

From an international student perspective in the article:

'He borrowed more than $50,000 to study in Australia, after an education consultant in India convinced him to ditch the significantly cheaper course to which he'd already been accepted in the UK.'

"Every consultant in Hyderabad I visited said Australia would be best, that I could work part time and pay back my fees," he said.

I'm quoting in isolation; but how does this contribute to the discussion? The reason the 'consultant' in India (who 99% sure won't be an Aus citizen or resident) is recommending the course is because they get paid on a commission basis as a % of the total course fee.

If you're not all that ethically inclined then of course the 'consultant' will recommend the most expensive course (usually with some total BS about getting residency - which, by the way, is _very_ hard to do now through studies) rather than the course that best suits the needs of the person.

Unfortunately for the students, there is very little the Aus government can do to regulate the conduct of 'consultants' operating in foreign countries.

Hnbii on October 4th, 2020 at 22:29 UTC »

I was formerly an international student and I would advise prospective students to stay away as well.

The Australian degree didn't open that many doors for me. I could have gotten an equivalent or better education at a much lower cost.

Chances for permanent residency is also low,despite what many here seem to think.

I've had friends go on and study in Germany who have much better outcomes and paid a fraction of the cost for their education. Of course,they had to learn German but it doesn't take long to learn,maybe a year or two. I think for a Mandarin speaking student it may even be more advisable for them to study in Taiwan or Singapore,and they would still have more opportunities afterwards than studying in Australia. This is all with benefit of hindsight, of course.

If I were to advise anyone,it would be to go to where you would be valued,not somewhere you would be seen as lesser than.

tranbo on October 4th, 2020 at 22:24 UTC »

Universities need to be less reliant on overseas students. Unfortunately this means more governmental support, which will never happen in this