Opinion: With Justice Ginsburg’s death, Mitch McConnell’s nauseating hypocrisy comes into full focus

Authored by latimes.com and submitted by viva_la_vinyl
image for Opinion: With Justice Ginsburg’s death, Mitch McConnell’s nauseating hypocrisy comes into full focus

Not just that Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg might die before the election. But that Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, the most shameless man in Washington, would respond with one of the most nauseating acts of political hypocrisy in decades — vowing to rush a new Trump appointee onto the court in the two short months before the election.

That may not seem so nauseating and hypocritical on the face of it. After all, Donald Trump is the sitting president and Ginsburg died on his watch, so by law, Trump is entitled to nominate a successor and McConnell, in the ordinary course of events, would schedule confirmation hearings.

But McConnell doesn’t believe that! He argued just the opposite four years ago when Justice Antonin Scalia died and it was President Obama’s constitutional duty to fill the seat during his last year in office. Remember what McConnell did? He simply refused to hold confirmation hearings for Obama’s nominee in the Senate and ran out the clock until the following January. He argued — utterly unpersuasively — that a president in the final year of his term shouldn’t be appointing new justices.

Now, however, when it’s a Republican who wants to appoint a justice — surprise! — McConnell feels differently. He said in a statement Friday evening that a Trump appointee will get a Senate floor vote. In other words, he has no intention of sticking to his supposed principles. Instead, he’s got some complicated rationale that purportedly explains why this situation is different.

But let’s face reality: This is a cynical, partisan reversal.

Here’s the column I wrote on the subject back in July when Ginsburg fell ill. I argued that if she died, McConnell should do the consistent and honorable thing — and refuse to act on Trump’s nominee as a way to right the grievous wrong he did in 2016.

JaracRassen77 on September 19th, 2020 at 14:02 UTC »

The Dems need to wake up and realize that they need to stop this "high road" crap! Republicans have been bringing guns to a knife fight, and winning each and every time! If McConnell and Trump get a Justice in, and the Dems take back the White House and both branches of Congress, they need to take the gloves off. I'd ram through the most progressive agenda since FDR:

Statehood for DC and Puerto Rico Hell, pack the Court like FDR threatened to do. That can actually be passed with a simple law in Congress. Pass a bill to eliminate a certain amount of student loan debt. Roll back the tax cuts for the rich. Reverse the Citizens United decision.

They need to fight like Truman did in 1948, and nail the Republicans to the wall.

way2funni on September 19th, 2020 at 12:44 UTC »

Did anyone really believe his belief that presidents should not be nominating supreme court justices in their last year of office would cut both ways?

No. He might as well have said "we're not going to allow a LIBERAL president another chance to nominate a Supreme Court Justice. We still do what we want."

McConnell has insisted that the precedent he created in denying former President Barack Obama’s nomination of Judge Merrick Garland in the final year of Obama’s term—to fill a vacancy that occurred nearly nine months before the 2016 election—no longer applies, because the same party controls both the White House and the Senate majority.

I would have gone with the fact that at the time of the Garland appointment, Obama was leaving office no matter what, his 2 terms in office were essentially over.

Trump has only completed one term, and is seeking another, and another so that's got to count for something? amirite? AMIRITE? /s

tl;dr they do this, kiss Roe v. Wade goodbye, all the GOP's greatest hits come out and will get rammed through.

SmallGerbil on September 19th, 2020 at 12:06 UTC »

"nauseating", sure, but also "antidemocratic", "authoritarian", "crypto-fascist"