Unemployment benefits: Employers are having trouble recruiting. They blame the federal $600 bump

Authored by edition.cnn.com and submitted by joecooool418

(CNN) The Which Wich sandwich shop in Buford, Georgia, has more customers than its staff of four can handle, even with the owner pitching in to prepare orders.

The eatery wants to hire one or two more workers but is having a hard time finding takers for the positions, which pay between $8.50 and $10 an hour, said Zalak Thakkar, an investor in the shop. Those who send resumes, he said, don't answer follow-up calls.

It's hurting the store's bottom line. The employees are overworked, and sales are down 5% to 10%, in part because customers leave when they see long lines, he said.

Why is it so hard to find workers when Georgia's unemployment rate was 7.6% in June, more than double February's level? Thakkarbelieves it's because of the $600 weekly boost to unemployment benefits that Congress enacted in late March in response to the coronavirus pandemic. The federal supplement has provided the jobless with $15 an hour, before factoring in Georgia's state benefits of up to $365 a week.

Zalak Thakkar, an investor in a Georgia sandwich shop, said the extra $600 unemployment benefit makes it harder to find people to hire.

"If the government is paying more to stay home, why would those people be out there risking their lives, number one, number two, staying away from their families and number three, making less money?" Thakkar said.

"I don't blame these people," he continued. "If I were them, I'd do what's best for my family."

The $600 enhancement, which runs out this week , has helped millions pay the rent, buy groceries and cover other bills during the pandemic-fueled lockdowns. The generous boost was designed to keep laid-off people at home instead of out looking for work.

But it has also kept some workers on the sidelines -- creating headaches for employers trying to get back up and running, even as new coronavirus surges complicate state reopenings.

Republicans, however, are concerned that such generous payments may deter people from going back to their jobs, which would slow the economic recovery. They point to research, including a Congressional Budget Office estimate that found that five out of six recipients would receive more in unemployment benefits than from returning to work should the $600 benefit be extended through January.

The Senate delayed introducing a plan this week amid negotiations over a proposal that could entail reducing the benefit and possibly combining it with a return-to-work bonus.

LISTEN: $600 unemployment benefits end soon

The federal $600 weekly boost to jobless benefits expire this month unless Congress extends it.

Small business owners say they are having trouble convincing employees to come back or hiring new ones. Nearly one in five have had an employee decline a job offer because he or she wanted to remain on unemployment, according to a May survey by the National Federation of Independent Business Research Center.

Take Darren Holley, the owner of an asphalt paving company in Tampa, Florida, who has enough work to hire 20 people in the next few days. Holley hasn't been able to bid on as many contracts as he'd like because he doesn't have enough crews to do the jobs.

Darren Holley, in black, long-sleeve shirt, can't take on more contracts because he can't find workers.

And though Florida's unemployment rate was 10.4% in June, Holley said most applicants don't show up for interviews, and temp agencies tell him they don't have anyone to send. Recently, six people were scheduled, but only one came -- an hour late.

Unemployed Floridians can make as much as $875 a week, when combined with state benefits, which is more than what Holley pays.

"Finding the people that are willing to apply and come in and that want to work, that's the tough thing," said Holley, adding he did not have this much trouble hiring prior to the pandemic. "The byproduct of this stimulus bill has been the depletion and the disintegration of the general labor pool."

Jobless Americans can't turn down positions and continue to collect unemployment benefits -- unless they meet the criteria to qualify for a temporary pandemic program that Congress created to help those directly affected by the coronavirus.

But employers say that this doesn't actually happen in practice. Some owners say they don't have time to report those who refuse to accept an offer, while others say it's hard to inform their state unemployment agency of employees who won't come back.

Not all of Walid Sukarieh's employees returned to their former positions after he reopened his Boston eye care stores in mid-May. That's forced him to close one location on Thursdays, although he has many more customers now.

Sukarieh is trying to hire for a job that pays more than $50,000 a year, on average, but has seen less interest than before the pandemic.

"Everybody technically is right now employed by the government in a certain way," he said.

Some small business owners hope that Congress doesn't extend the $600 boost, at least not across the country. Some states and industries are doing better than others, and work is available, they note.

"The economy will never get back to normal if we encourage people not to go get a job," said Dan Crane, owner of a medical billing company in Salt Lake City, Utah, who is finding it difficult to hire for six openings.

But as the clock ticks on the $600 boost, some Americans are ramping up their job searches.

Holley is already seeing more interest. Earlier this week, he hired two people, and of the three interviews that were scheduled on Tuesday, two showed up and one called to reschedule.

"I'm expecting a flood of applicants probably Monday or Tuesday," he said. "All of a sudden, it's going to be 'Are you guys hiring?'"

liand22 on July 24th, 2020 at 18:01 UTC »

I left a job once over the denial of a $500 raise. I had set a personal goal of making a certain salary, and that bump was all it would take. I'd gotten 6 years of "exceeds expectations" in every review, but raises went to people at the highest levels and didn't trickle down.

After I left, they hired a consultant for more than I made annually to do ONE of the projects I did every year - and the consultant didn't get the results they wanted. They tried to hire me back, this time for 5K more, but I turned them down. They had the money all along, just didn't want to spend it.

Along those lines, in another job, we lost our senior staff member to a rival company. My boss thought we could hire someone with her years of experience and rather unique skillset for $25K a year less. We had to show him actual market research that there was no way we could hire anyone with half the skills she had for that salary.

BS_Is_Annoying on July 24th, 2020 at 16:33 UTC »

Business owners look for a simple story to explain something, and the $600 is easy to explain a complex problem. The complex problem being a combination of Covid19 risk, low pay, and under employment. Who the fuck wants to risk their life at Which Wich for a starvation salary?

Business owners want people to be desperate so they don't have to actually work to recruit people.

autofill34 on July 24th, 2020 at 14:30 UTC »

This was a problem before covid. It's just being exacerbated by the higher risk now associated with working the shitty, low-wage job, and probably to a smaller extent because of the unemployment. The $600 prevents people from being forced to take dangerous jobs that don't pay very well. 🤷‍♀️

A lot of people say that they should just raise the wage and that would fix the problem. I think this is a mixed bag. You can pay people above minimum wage ($12-14)and still have a hard time staffing. I honestly think you would have to pay something like $18-20/hr to bandage over the staffing problem.