Suspicions of Russian Bounties Were Bolstered by Data on Financial Transfers

Authored by nytimes.com and submitted by SunOverSnowPlease
image for Suspicions of Russian Bounties Were Bolstered by Data on Financial Transfers

On Monday, the administration invited several House Republicans to the White House to discuss the intelligence. The briefing was mostly carried out by three Trump administration officials: Mr. Ratcliffe, Mr. O’Brien and Mark Meadows, the White House chief of staff. Until recently, both Mr. Meadows and Mr. Ratcliffe were Republican congressmen known for being outspoken supporters of Mr. Trump.

That briefing focused on intelligence information that supported the conclusion that Russia was running a covert bounty operation and other information that did not support it, according to two people familiar with the meeting. For example, the briefing focused in part on the interrogated detainees’ accounts and the earlier analysts’ disagreement over it.

Both people said the intent of the briefing seemed to be to make the point that the intelligence on the suspected Russian bounty plot was not clear cut. For example, one of the people said, the White House also cited some interrogations by Afghan intelligence officials of other detainees, playing down their credibility by describing them as low-level.

The administration officials did not mention anything in the House Republican briefing about intercepted data tracking financial transfers, both of the people familiar with it said.

Democrats and Senate Republicans were also separately briefed at the White House on Tuesday morning. Democrats emerged saying that the issue was clearly not, as Mr. Trump has suggested, a “hoax.” They demanded to hear directly from intelligence officials, rather than from Mr. Trump’s political appointees, but conceded they had not secured a commitment for such a briefing.

Based on the intelligence they saw, the lawmakers said they were deeply troubled by Mr. Trump’s insistence he did not know about the plot and his subsequent obfuscation when it became public.

“I find it inexplicable in light of these very public allegations that the president hasn’t come before the country and assured the American people that he will get to the bottom of whether Russia is putting bounties on American troops and that he will do everything in his power to make sure that we protect American troops,” said Representative Adam B. Schiff, Democrat of California and the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee.

bdresner on June 30th, 2020 at 19:46 UTC »

Of all the horrible things Trump has done, I can't think of anything as unanimously unpopular as sitting idle to the murder of your own troops. How the hell will this be rationalized?

Uncleniles on June 30th, 2020 at 19:02 UTC »

So there goes the "there wasn't sufficient evidence to inform the president" excuse. Their lies are called one by one as they make them.

Pahasapa66 on June 30th, 2020 at 18:39 UTC »

"It's clear to me that he should have immediately contacted the Joint Chiefs to discuss what are we going to do about this."

"He should have picked up the phone and said "Vladimir old buddy, if any of this is true, we've got a big problem!"

"If he knew about this, and if anything is even remotely true and he did nothing about it, he's unfit for duty."

~Joe Biden, addressing the nation this morning, responding to questions about Trump and BountyGate....... and even Fox is broadcasting it.