Australia to spend $270b building larger military to prepare for 'poorer, more dangerous' world and rise of China

Authored by abc.net.au and submitted by Ardeet
image for Australia to spend $270b building larger military to prepare for 'poorer, more dangerous' world and rise of China

Scott Morrison has unveiled a more aggressive defence strategy aimed at countering the rise of China, while warning that Australia faces regional challenges on a scale not seen since World War II.

Key points: Scott Morrison has committed $270 billion to defence spending over the next 10 years

Scott Morrison has committed $270 billion to defence spending over the next 10 years The ADF will get long-range anti-shipping missiles as it refocuses on possible conflict with China in the Indo-Pacific

The ADF will get long-range anti-shipping missiles as it refocuses on possible conflict with China in the Indo-Pacific The PM says the region is the "epicentre" of rising strategic competition

The strategy increases the focus on the Indo-Pacific region, with the Prime Minister warning that Australia needs to prepare for a post-COVID-19 world that is "poorer, more dangerous and more disorderly".

Australia will build a larger military that is focused on its immediate backyard, including new long-range anti-ship missiles, signalling a major shift in the nation's defence strategy.

"We have not seen the conflation of global economic and strategic uncertainty now being experienced here in Australia in our region since the existential threat we faced when the global and regional order collapsed in the 1930s and 1940s," the Prime Minister warned.

Mr Morrison also announced a commitment to spend $270 billion over the next decade on defence capabilities, including more potent strike weapons, cyber capabilities and a high-tech underwater surveillance system.

Over the four years, the Australian Defence Force (ADF) is expected to grow by 800 people, comprising 650 extra personnel for the Navy, 100 for the Air Force, and 50 for the Army.

According to Defence's 2019-20 Budget Statement, the ADF was estimated to grow to 60,090 by this year, with 16,272 full-time public service staff.

Its budget was expected to grow to 2 per cent of Australia's gross domestic product by 2020-21, "equating to approximately $200 billion in Australia's defence capability over 10 years", making the new announcement an increase of $70 billion to the department.

In a speech at the Australian Defence Force Academy Mr Morrison argued the Indo-Pacific is the "epicentre" of rising strategic competition and "the risk of miscalculation — and even conflict — is heightening".

"The Indo-Pacific is where we live — and we want an open, sovereign Indo-Pacific, free from coercion and hegemony," a copy of the speech says.

Mr Morrison argued increasing Australia's defence capability was vital to shoring up the nation's position in the region.

"The strategic competition between China and the United States means that there's a lot of tension in the cord and a lot of risk of miscalculation," Mr Morrison told Channel Seven.

"And so we have to be prepared and ready to frame the world in which we live as best as we can, and be prepared to respond and play our role to protect Australia, defend Australia."

Space to play or pause, M to mute, left and right arrows to seek, up and down arrows for volume. Watch Duration: 4 minutes 55 seconds 4 m 55 s Defence Correspondent Andrew Greene interviews ASPI executive director Peter Jennings

In releasing the 2020 Defence Strategy Update and the accompanying Force Structure Plan, the Government confirmed Australia would purchase the AGM-158C Long Range Anti-Ship Missile (LRASM) from the United States Navy, at a cost of $800 million.

The missile has a range of more than 370 kilometres and would be a significant upgrade from the 124 km range of Australia's AGM-84 air-launched Harpoon anti-ship missile, introduced in the early 1980s.

Up to $9.3 billion will also be spent on research and development into high-speed, long-range weapons, including hypersonic weapons.

"The ADF now needs stronger deterrence capabilities," Mr Morrison told an audience of defence leaders.

"Capabilities that can hold potential adversaries' forces and critical infrastructure at risk from a distance, thereby deterring an attack on Australia and helping to prevent war."

A massive underwater surveillance system using high-tech sensors and costing between $5 billion and $7 billion is one of the biggest new purchases which could eventually also include unmanned submarines.

Mr Morrison has also promised to boost the ADF's ability to deal with what he described as the "grey zone" — activity against Australia's interests which falls below the threshold of traditional armed conflict.

The Australian Navy is expected to grow by 650 personnel over the next decade. ( Supplied: Department of Defence/Kylie Jagiello )

Labor's defence spokesman, Richard Marles, welcomed the shift in strategy.

"COVID-19 is changing the world around us, the world in which we live," he said.

"Labor supports strong defence resilience for Australia in the face of this, that is going to be much more important … in the future than it has been in the past."

Peter Jennings from the Australian Strategic Policy Institute (ASPI) said the world had changed dramatically since the last Defence White Paper was released, particularly in the era of COVID-19.

"What this policy document does is it starts to increase the hitting power of the Defence Force in the short term, rather than being focused on building submarines that will be ready in the late 2030s and into the 2040s," Mr Jennings told ABC RN.

"We've got to be worried about 2020 and the next 12 to 24 months or so."

Mr Jennings said there was "only one country with both the capacity and the desire to dominate the Indo-Pacific region in a way that works against Australia's interest".

"We're not talking about Canada," he said.

"When they talk about the bad behaviour that's happening in the region, the annexation of territory, coercion, the influencing of domestic politics, the use of cyber attacks – it's really only one country which is doing that at industrial levels, and that's the People's Republic of China."

The Government will spend $15 billion on cyber and information warfare capabilities over the next 10 years, $1.3 billion of which will be used to boost the cyber security activities of the Australian Signals Directorate and the Australian Cyber Security Centre.

Including a network of satellites for an independent communications network, $7 billion will also go towards improving Defence's capabilities in space.

Mr Morrison said the 10-year funding commitment went beyond the Government's pledge to boost Defence spending to 2 per cent of GDP.

Have more information? Contact Andrew Greene at [email protected] and Jade Macmillan at [email protected].

MaterialIndividual on July 1st, 2020 at 03:13 UTC »

Hate to out myself as a Defence Contractor, but here it is. Australia is far more equipped at developing defence tech than most people realize.

There's a lot of misinformation about what's going on in Australia already in terms of defence work, in this thread.

[Info Drop]

The first thing you all need to know is some history of defence exporting. If you develop defence tech in Australia, you have to apply to the Aus Government for a license to export it. This means you can't export it to people we don't like. Say you export to Germany, that German importer puts the "German" defense regulation on it. It no longer is 'Australian Defence Tech' and can be handled in the way Germany accepts. If the Germans want to sell your tech to our enemies, the Emu's, there's nothing 'legally' you're going to do to stop them.

America's is slightly, but significantly, different. Theirs is called ITAR and it is single-handedly the most overreaching agreement there is. If you buy any American made defence tech, it is ITAR. If you incorporate a tiny but of ITAR into your Aussie defence project, the whole thing is now ITAR (not just the small part), in addition to the Aussie regulations. Being ITAR, you have to ask the US Government for permission to export it, sell it, show it to anyone. This ITAR stamp doesn't wash off. You can ignore it, (and sell to the iranians for example) but then the US puts you on a list and the US won't buy or sell from you anymore, and anyone who buys or sells to you also becomes tainted, (and they wont get US $$$), ad infinum. No one wants to be tainted. This effectively splits the world defence market: Those who deal with the US, and those who don't (They deal with China, Russia, and Iran). This ITAR rule is the reason you see these nations buy from Russia or China only. You get caught ignoring ITAR and you better believe that's a paddlin'. Chinese Company ZTE sold US ITAR defence tech to North Korea, they were fined $1.2 Billion - link - then allowed to continue working with the US. If you're not backed by the Chinese government, you're done for ever.

I could go on and on about ITAR and how if an American citizen, in Australia, gives you idea for your project that you may or may not implement, the US government "takes it" and claims ITAR. You try fighting the US government that you're tech is not a little bit theirs, when they have a huge conflict of interest because there's money to be made for them.

The American government shut down European private commerical rocket companies based on this:

> " The European company Thales Alenia Space developed a line of ITAR-free satellites that used no restricted U.S. components, allowing them to be launched on Chinese rockets between 2005 and 2012.[120] However, the U.S. Department of State did not accept the ITAR-free status of these satellites and fined the US company Aeroflex $8 million for selling ITAR components. Thales Alenia was forced to discontinue its ITAR-free satellite line in 2013.[121] "

Wikipedia

The reason you can't buy Huwawei any more? They tried to take ITAR tech:

https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2019/02/a-bloomberg-reporter-watched-the-fbi-run-a-sting-on-huawei.html

Anyway. Short version: If you're buying defense tech you want it to be ITAR free (e.g. no involvement with America at all.) Otherwise you need their permission to do anything.

[End international arms regulations spew]

Because of this, there's a huge market for defence tech development outside the US (Isreal is a big one, Russia, China, Europe makes its own planes etc etc). Australia has many child companies to the big defence contractors, Northrop Gruman, Harris, Boeing Defence etc They are staffed by local Australians, building, to the best of their ability, ITAR free technology. This means the US CANNOT be involved AT ALL. What we make, we sell, usually to South East Asian Countries, our allies in the UK and Europe, etc, and we don't have to ask the US for permission.

The Australian defence industry is a big industry. Our 'professionals' are actually cheaper than the American counterparts, we speak perfect english, we're highly educated, low corruption (compared to other outsource countries), and we make good stuff. Same as Canada.

We do our own manufacturing, testing, development, and research. We buy lots and lots from the US, but we try our best not too.

We already employ Australians, in Australia, to build Australian designed defence technology using local Australian suppliers.

Australian Testing Facilities:

https://www.minister.defence.gov.au/minister/melissa-price/media-releases/boeing-assembly-and-test-facility-opens-brisbane

Australian R&D:

https://www.australiandefence.com.au/defence/air/boeing-phantom-works-partners-on-unmanned-ai

http://www.boeing.com.au/news/releases/2017/june/boeing-opens-rd-facility-at-university-of-queensland.page

Further Reading on Export Controlled Regulations, if you're a masochist:

https://www.defence.gov.au/ExportControls/_Master/docs/Australian_Best_Practice_Guide.pdf

FatSilverFox on June 30th, 2020 at 23:01 UTC »

According to Michael Pascoe, it's a re-announcement of existing policy:

https://twitter.com/MichaelPascoe01/status/1278084464573181952

PhotographsWithFilm on June 30th, 2020 at 22:47 UTC »

Anybody think we are preparing for a war.....