The cheapest iPhone has a more powerful processor than the most expensive Android phone

Authored by androidcentral.com and submitted by Hidden_luck

Apple has updated the little iPhone SE for 2020, and even an Android fan has to see that it's a great phone at an even greater price of $399 for the base model. It's essentially an iPhone 8 with one big difference: it has Apple's A13 Bionic chip buried inside. And that's a big deal for a number of reasons. I expect that some people are going to tell me about single thread versus multi-threaded performance and how the A13 GPU isn't that great or how iPhones have much lower resolution screens so the chips don't have to work as hard. All this is true, but another thing is true: the A13 is a stronger chip than the Snapdragon 865 for daily use in every category — we've seen this applied in real life in the iPhone 11 already. The only area it misses out is 5G, and that's because Apple just doesn't care about 5G yet. (The rumored iPhone 12 will almost certainly have a Qualcomm 5G chipset inside, for what it's worth.) The Apple A13 is powerful enough to drive a laptop, let alone a smartphone. Nerdy things like CPU threads aside, you'll notice how well the new iPhone SE performs when you use it. Everything in a modern smartphone from web browsing to camera performance to less-used things like AR depends on the processor. You need to crunch numbers really fast if you want your phone to respond really fast. The $399 iPhone SE will be able to do these things faster than the new OnePlus 8 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy S20+. Sign up for ExpressVPN today and save 49%

It sounds crazy to say that Apple including its expensive new chip in its budget phone makes sense, but it does. Apple has but a single processor to design, manufacture, support, store, and deliver. The cost over an older chip like the A11 is surely significant, but isn't going to be as high as supporting and shipping that A11 in what will likely be a very popular smartphone. When iOS 16 comes out the iPhone SE will get it on day one. We'll see the same for iOS 17, too. What sounds less crazy, and great to consumers, is that by using the A13 Apple can support the iPhone SE for years — and this phone will outlive the iPhone 8 it is slated to replace for a handful of extra years because of the new chip. Basically, if the iPhone 11 can get updated, so can the iPhone SE. This is cool to hear today, but it will be really important in three years when another version of iOS is released and your $399 iPhone gets it on day one.

Moondo13 on April 23rd, 2020 at 02:25 UTC »

Wait, every comment I’ve ever read is “wow Apple is finally up to 2016 Android.”

InsightfulLemon on April 22nd, 2020 at 23:08 UTC »

This is pretty inexcusable, it's not like Apple are the only manufacturer who make their own chipsets

Both Samsung and Huawei shouldn't be limited to snapdragon performance yet they struggle even for parity with the off the shelf options

pmjm on April 22nd, 2020 at 22:48 UTC »

The comments here are baffling to me.

You fuckers would gush with glee if the headline was "The cheapest AMD CPU is now more powerful than the most expensive Intel."

It's not about one platform being "better" than another, it's about the stagnation in one space and a competitor coming in and taking advantage of that. If you love Android, you should WANT Android phones to be better. We need to demand more of manufacturers. Snapdragon CPUs are plenty fast but they're being left behind so why aren't phone makers looking for alternatives?

There are a thousand interesting discussions to have based on this article but everyone here is like, "apple fucking sucks" despite the fact that this article proves that at least one piece of their tech is literally superior from both a technology and economic perspective. If you disagree, great! Say why with a concrete reason other than "you can't do shit on an iPhone."

Y'all need to grow up.