A star orbiting the Milky Way’s giant black hole confirms Einstein was right

Authored by sciencenews.org and submitted by MistWeaver80

The first sign that Albert Einstein’s theory of gravity was correct has made a repeat appearance, this time near a supermassive black hole.

In 1915, Einstein realized that his newly formulated general theory of relativity explained a weird quirk in the orbit of Mercury. Now, that same effect has been found in a star’s orbit of the enormous black hole at the heart of the Milky Way, researchers with the GRAVITY collaboration report April 16 in Astronomy & Astrophysics.

The star, called S2, is part of a stellar entourage that surrounds the Milky Way’s central black hole. For decades, researchers have tracked S2’s elliptical motion around the black hole. The researchers previously had used observations of S2 to identify a different effect of general relativity, the reddening of the star’s light due to what’s called gravitational redshift (SN: 7/26/18).

Now, they’ve determined that the ellipse rotates over time, what’s known as Schwarzschild precession. That precession is the result of the warping of spacetime caused by massive objects, according to general relativity. A similar precession in Mercury’s orbit had stumped scientists before Einstein came along (SN: 4/11/18).

While physicists have never found a case where general relativity fails, they are searching for any cracks in the theory that could help lead to a new, improved theory of gravity. The new study confirms that Einstein’s theory checks out once again, even in the intense gravitational environment around a supermassive black hole.

grublets on April 16th, 2020 at 12:57 UTC »

I am still in awe of how these theories are supported by modern evidence (or at least not disproven) when Einstein and his contemporaries had tools like pen & paper and chalkboards.

No supercomputers or huge particle accelerators, just pure brain power.

Astrodude87 on April 16th, 2020 at 12:42 UTC »

Very awesome! But man do I dislike science journalism sometimes. You can’t prove Einstein is right. You can only say that the observations were consistent with his predictions. Maybe if we had 1000x better resolution it would be slightly off from his predictions, but we won’t know until we have better technology.

Anyway, just a small gripe because I feel this misleads non-scientists about how science is actually done.

Edit: Re-read it again. The article is good about its language, just its title is flawed. If I had to guess, that was someone further up who changed it to be more click-baity.

fuelter on April 16th, 2020 at 11:47 UTC »

Cool but the link doesn't explain how "warping of spacetime" would change the stars orbit. How does that physically work, not just mathematically?