Trump to halt WHO funding amid review

Authored by thehill.com and submitted by Frocharocha
image for Trump to halt WHO funding amid review

President Trump Donald John TrumpSenate committee to investigate origin of, response to coronavirus pandemic Amash teases possibility of third-party presidential bid Overnight Health Care: Trump fires back at critics during briefing | Trump claims he has authority on when to reopen states | Governors form groups to discuss plans | Fauci offers support to Trump | House delays return MORE on Tuesday said his administration will halt funding to the World Health Organization (WHO) pending a review of the global body for what he described as its mismanagement of the coronavirus outbreak.

Trump said at a White House briefing that the United States would suspend funding to the organization while officials conduct a review “to assess the World Health Organization’s role in severely mismanaging and covering up the spread of the coronavirus.”

The president criticized the WHO for opposing large-scale travel restrictions and accused it of failing to quickly vet and share accurate information on COVID-19.

“The WHO’s attack on travel restrictions put political correctness above life-saving measures,” Trump said in the Rose Garden. “The reality is that the WHO failed to adequately obtain, vet and share information in a timely and transparent fashion.”

Tuesday’s announcement immediately triggered backlash from the health community. The American Medical Association (AMA) swiftly issued a statement calling the move a “dangerous step in the wrong direction” and urging Trump to reconsider.

“Fighting a global pandemic requires international cooperation and reliance on science and data. Cutting funding to the WHO – rather than focusing on solutions – is a dangerous move at a precarious moment for the world,” the AMA said.

Trump said the review would last between 60 and 90 days and insisted his administration would spend the money to otherwise help combat the virus, though he didn’t go into specifics.

“We will be able to take that money and channel it to the areas most needed,” Trump said. “We have not been treated properly.”

Trump accused the WHO of treating the U.S. unfairly, repeatedly pointing to the disparity in funding the organization receives from the U.S. versus China. The U.S. is the largest contributor to the global organization.

Trump also criticized the WHO for praising China’s supposed transparency with respect to the coronavirus, despite the president himself doing the same in late January. Trump denied talking about Beijing’s transparency when pressed about his past remarks during an exchange with reporters later Tuesday.

Trump said last week that he was considering withholding funding to the WHO over its handling of the coronavirus, accusing it of favoritism toward Beijing and rebuking it for opposing his travel restriction on China. He has also characterized the WHO’s response to the outbreak as sluggish.

Trump’s increased focus on the WHO comes as he undergoes increasing scrutiny for his own response to the virus. The president downplayed the threat of the coronavirus early on in the outbreak, and health experts say that early missteps with testing hampered the overall U.S. response.

Conservatives in particular have stepped up criticism of the WHO in recent weeks, charging that the organization has been overly trusting of China’s reporting and slow to prepare the international community for the novel coronavirus.

They have also zeroed in on WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus’s praise of China’s handling of the virus despite reports about efforts by Beijing to conceal the extent of the outbreak. Sen. Martha McSally Martha Elizabeth McSallyKudlow slams senators who allegedly traded stock before pandemic Graham backs Trump, vows no money for WHO in next funding bill Trump considering suspending funding to WHO MORE (R-Ariz.) recently called on Tedros to resign over the organization’s handling of the virus.

Trump said Tuesday that his administration would continue to engage with the WHO on possible reform during the administration’s review of the organization’s actions.

ProfessorMadness on April 15th, 2020 at 02:33 UTC »

Okay... so when do we review Trump’s approach to the virus?

The_Novelty-Account on April 14th, 2020 at 23:30 UTC »

The WHO, like most multilateral bodies, has a decision-making body. In the case of the WHO it is the World Health Assembly (WHA). The decisions and programs undertaken by the secretariat have their own mandate, but the WHO does not have a governance mandate outside of the WHA. That means that the largest countries with the most alliances are able to set WHO policy mandates.

The WHO will take a legitimacy hit, but if other Western countries do not pull funding then the only thing that this definitely accomplishes is removing American voices and policy direction from the largest international health organization.

EDIT: I am not saying that the strategy definitely won't be effective or that WHO definitely will not undertake reforms in response to this (though I doubt it highly) but I am saying that there are more effective internal ways to do so that do not involve lack of US voice supplanted by China, or the withdrawal of funding from an organization that many developing countries rely on for health infrastructure and information. The WHO is much bigger than this pandemic.

GrowlingM1ke on April 14th, 2020 at 22:48 UTC »

I'll need to do some research into the allegations that the WHO has horribly miscommunicated/mismanaged the pandemic crisis. However considering that Trump decided to do this in the midst of the pandemic leads me to believe that this is simply political maneuvering to shift the blame away from his administration.