PG&E Will Plead Guilty to Involuntary Manslaughter in Camp Fire

Authored by nytimes.com and submitted by hildebrand_rarity
image for PG&E Will Plead Guilty to Involuntary Manslaughter in Camp Fire

But Karen Gowins, who lost her home in the Camp Fire, criticized the plea agreement on Monday and said that the company may never be fully held to account for its failings.

“I don’t see this as a win for the victims no matter which way it all goes,” said Ms. Gowins, who is a member of a committee that represents wildfire victims in PG&E’s bankruptcy case. “Basically, they’re just going to slap them on the hand. I keep saying, ‘Only the Lord can open a door now.’”

Ms. Gowins fears that people like her will ultimately receive little from the utility for their losses. Half of the $13.5 billion settlement PG&E reached with wildfire victims will be in the form of company stock, which has fallen sharply since mid-February when stock markets began tumbling because of the expanding coronavirus outbreak.

“I’m just not sure how Paradise is going to be able to stand back up on its feet,” she said.

Kirk Trostle, who also lost his home in Paradise, said the deal was inadequate and called on prosecutors to bring charges against PG&E officers. He said most of his two dozen family members who lived in the town have scattered across the state.

“They decimated my entire town,” Mr. Trostle said. “To me, this is just a drop in the bucket for what should be happening to PG&E.”

Mike Ramsey, the Butte County district attorney, said the penalty was the maximum allowed under California law. He added that other government agencies could seek bigger damages from PG&E, including a roughly $2 billion proposed fine by the utilities commission.

PG&E will plead guilty to unlawfully causing a fire and 84 counts of involuntary manslaughter. That is one less than the Camp Fire’s total toll because officials have ruled one death a suicide, Mr. Ramsey said.

456afisher on March 23rd, 2020 at 14:17 UTC »

Why is this company still allowed to function as a "state utility"?

Mountains_beyond on March 23rd, 2020 at 14:05 UTC »

A California Public Utilities Commission investigation of the events that led to the catastrophic blaze concluded that the company violated 12 state safety rules, which regulators deemed not a rare instance but instead “indicative of an overall pattern of inadequate inspection and maintenance of PG&E’s transmission facilities.’’

So the problems were so pervasive, that they couldn’t even single out individual employees to charge with criminal negligence? They are in bankruptcy now, so this might not even significantly hit anyone’s pockets.

Blackadar1 on March 23rd, 2020 at 13:32 UTC »

It doesn't really matter if nobody's going to jail and they've already reached a settlement figure.

That's the whole problem with this "corporations are people" bullshit. If you or I negligently start a fire that burns a town and kills almost 100 people, we go to jail. PG&E does it? No one gets locked up. And make no doubt, if you read the facts of how this starter PG&E was entirely negligent.