Buttigieg Supported by GOP Oligarch Len Blavatnik

Authored by lawandcrime.com and submitted by nnnarbz
image for Buttigieg Supported by GOP Oligarch Len Blavatnik

Democratic presidential candidate and former South Bend, Indiana mayor Pete Buttigieg is facing questions after recent revelations that his 2020 effort has taken campaign contributions from an infamous Republican Party billionaire with direct links to the Russian oligarchy. That’s according Federal Election Commission (FEC) data reviewed by Law&Crime.

Previously described in the press as “The Giver,” Leonard “Len” Blavatnik is a well-known GOP donor with a New York address who previously took it upon himself to fund President Donald Trump‘s lavish — and allegedly criminal — inauguration festivities in 2017 to the tune of some $1 million.

Now, Blavatnik and his wife are apparently shifting allegiances. As of this writing, they have donated thousands of dollars to Pete for America, Inc., Buttigieg’s official campaign organization.

A summer 2017 commentary for the Dallas Morning News by Ruth May catalogues a bit more of Blavatnik’s political spending habits:

Donald Trump and the political action committees for Mitch McConnell, Marco Rubio, Scott Walker, Lindsey Graham, John Kasich and John McCain accepted $7.35 million in contributions from a Ukrainian-born oligarch who is the business partner of two of Russian president Vladimir Putin‘s favorite oligarchs and a Russian government bank.

Citing public data available via the FEC and from campaign finance data clearinghouse OpenSecrets, May notes that most of Blavatnik’s largesse was distributed among Republicans during the 2015-2016 election campaign–accounting for $6.35 million of the oligarch’s spending up to that point.

“Mitch McConnell was the top [individual] recipient of Blavatnik’s donations, collecting $2.5 million for his GOP Senate Leadership Fund under the names of two of Blavatnik’s holding companies, Access Industries and AI Altep Holdings,” she wrote.

A January 2019 Quartz article describes another notable expenditure:

Trump’s campaign didn’t receive any Blavatnik cash during the 2016 campaign but he has donated large sums to the Republican National Committee’s legal fund, which has helped finance Trump’s legal defense for the Russia probe, according to the Wall Street Journal.

Aside from the large sums of campaign cash doled out to leading Republicans, Blavatnik has largely been considered problematic by the media and Beltway establishment because of his documented ties to Vladimir Putin and the Russian leader’s inner circle.

“Blavatnik’s relationships with Russian oligarchs close to Putin, particularly Oleg Deripaska, should be worrisome for Trump and the six GOP leaders who took Blavatnik’s money during the 2016 presidential campaign,” May wrote in 2017.

MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow long and loudly beat the anti-Blavatnik drum–and played up his oligarchical connections–while he was mainly known for donating to Republicans and ramped up criticism amidst a controversy that saw Deripaska’s network delisted from the United States’ sanctions regime against the Russian Federation.

Liberal outlet Mother Jones reported on those connections in 2019:

Rep. Jackie Speier (D-Calif.) sent a separate letter probing whether [Treasury Secretary Steven] Mnuchin has a personal conflict of interest in the delisting deal. In her letter, first reported by Buzzfeed, Speier noted that prior to taking office Mnuchin owned a movie production company that he sold, in part, to Access Industries, a company owned by Len Blavatnik, a Russian-born billionaire who has ties to Deripaska. Blavatnik sits on the board of a company called SUAL, a major shareholder in Rusal. According to the New York Times, SUAL’s stake in Rusal will increase as part of Deripaska’s deal with the Treasury Department. In short, a man who is believed to have paid Mnuchin as much as $25 million for his movie company may well benefit from the deal to remove Rusal from the sanctions list.

Buttigieg’s support from the Blavatnik family, so far, runs in excess of $5,000, according to the FEC–close to the maximum allowed by law.

And, since making the donations to Buttigieg’s campaign, the Blavatniks have attempted to “purchase” “influence” (as progressives maintain) with the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) as well, giving the Democratic Party’s leading congressional incumbent protection organization well over $400,000 — all the while hedging their bets and keeping up similarly-sized donations to the GOP as well, according to publicly-available data collected by the FEC. Giving to both sides is a tactic also employed by some American businesses and business leaders.

The former mayor’s support from the so-called “Russian-linked oligarch” was first noted by Men4Choice co-founder Justin Horowitz.

“Wow. One of the billionaires powering Pete Buttigieg’s campaign is a Russian-linked oligarch who contributed millions to Trump and GOP PACs for Lindsay Graham, Marco Rubio, Mitch McConnell and Scott Walker,” Horowitz noted. “You can’t make this stuff up.”

“[Rachel Maddow, MSNBC, and] #resistance twitter made multiple media cycles about this donor, saying Russia was taking over America,” Horowitz continued — responding to left-wing criticism that his language was playing leaning too heavily on the largely discredited Russiagate narrative. “Only reason I said ‘russian-linked’ is to point out obvious hypocrisy they engage in on the daily. Billionaire right winger is all that really matters.”

Law&Crime reached out to the Buttigieg campaign for comment and clarification on this report, but no response was forthcoming at the time of publication.

JohnGillnitz on February 8th, 2020 at 18:18 UTC »

Hang on... $5K through a bundeler is not the same thing as millions of dollars to a PAC. I'd like to know if Buttigieg even knew about it. It sounds like the Russians are giving token amounts to Dems just so it appears that both parties are on the Russian money train equally.

dragonfliesloveme on February 8th, 2020 at 17:10 UTC »

And Lindsey Graham, don’t forget Lindsey.

Why the fuck is this legal? Our president and our Senators and even an aspiring presidential candidate can be influenced and beholden to a hostile foreign nation? Or any nation, for that matter, but fuck Russia and fuck our politicians for being bought by them.

Absolutely sickening.

Renegade_falco45 on February 8th, 2020 at 16:52 UTC »

If you don’t know who LEN BLAVATNIK is you should check out his Wikipedia. He literally made donations to an anti-trump group and the Trump inaugural committee in the same year. He also donated to both Obama and Romney in 2012. Also has given financial support to Shumer, Harris, and other major dems. Context is helpful here.

EDIT: I’m replying to my original comment because I don’t have time to reply to everyone on the thread, but I’m happy to see the engagement.

In order to understand what this guy is about you have to understand how kleptocrats operate. For the most part he does not care about US politics all that much. What he cares about is presenting himself in a positive light in the West. Hence why he gives money to bitter political rivals, random think tanks, etc. He does not do this to create division in the US. Yes he is Russian by birth, but he could care less about geopolitical feuds. Blavatnik has no real allegiance to any particular country. He even demands that journalists mention his U.K. and US citizenship whenever he’s covered in the news. When you’re a kleptocrat of this magnitude you focus on staying out of the spotlight, using your dark money to buy yourself a positive public image, and remain ambiguous.

Has a politician/organization ever denied a donation from Blavatnik? Yes, December 2018, the Hudson Institute accepted a donation from him — and then returned the donation, following an outcry from anti-kleptocracy voices. Other than that single case I’m not aware of any other denials.

The US has become a safe haven for kleptocrats seeking to offload cash through political donations. Tell your politicians to send the money back. They all seem to be taking the donations no matter what affiliation. Because politicians think they’re untouchable.