Trump Named ‘Worst President for Our Environment in History' by Nine Green Groups

Authored by ecowatch.com and submitted by maxwellhill
image for Trump Named ‘Worst President for Our Environment in History' by Nine Green Groups

As President Donald Trump prepared to give his third State of the Union Address Tuesday night, nine conservation groups considered the state of the nation's environment.

"Donald Trump has been the worst president for our environment in history," the groups wrote in a statement released Tuesday .

As of Dec. 21 of 2019, the Trump administration had attempted to roll back more than 90 environmental rules and regulations, The New York Times reported . Those included:

In his speech to a joint session of Congress Tuesday, which came a day before the Senate is set to vote on whether or not to remove him from office following an impeachment trial, Trump talked up his deregulatory efforts as a boon to the U.S. economy.

"Thanks to our bold regulatory reduction campaign, the United States has become the No. 1 producer of oil and natural gas anywhere in the world, by far," he said, according to a transcript published by The New York Times.

However, The New York Times pointed out in a separate fact-check that the U.S. became the world's leading oil producer in 2013 and its leading gas producer in 2009, making it impossible to credit Trump's rollbacks.

Trump's only other mention of environmental policy came when he spoke of his decision to join the One Trillion Trees Initiative, a plan launched by the World Economic Forum to plant, conserve and restore one trillion trees.

The plan is intended to help fight the climate crisis and restore biodiversity. Capturing carbon in forests, grasslands and wetlands can achieve as much as one third of the emissions reductions needed to meet Paris agreement goals by 2030, the initiative pointed out, but such so-called "natural solutions" need to go along with reducing emissions in the energy, heavy industry and finance sectors.

Trump called the initiative "an ambitious effort to bring together government and private sector to plant new trees in America and all around the world," but did not mention the climate crisis.

However, The New York Times pointed out that the U.S. emitted 5.8 billion tons of greenhouse gasses in 2019. To plant enough trees to draw all of that down out of the atmosphere would require an area of land about four times the size of California.

Alkalinum on February 8th, 2020 at 13:41 UTC »

What about the presidents that resided over all the nuclear tests in the 50s-70s? The entire earths atmosphere is still irradiated, hundreds of square miles of islands and oceans are still uninhabitable to humans? Oil, gas and coal use was massively encouraged back then too, with the reduction of public transport and increase in consumerism and production of waste. Sure, Trumps been terrible for the environment at a crucial time in our history, but this sort of hyperbole is just making these groups look like political reactionaries.

morgan423 on February 8th, 2020 at 13:31 UTC »

Worst POTUS maybe... but not the worst president for the environment in the entire world. There is this guy in Brazil, for instance, who's been assisting in the mass burning off of the Amazon rain forest.

Man, the world is awful right now.

Edit: spelling

brooklyn_red on February 8th, 2020 at 12:12 UTC »

'Nine Green Groups', I'm sure Trump and his supporters will see that as a badge of honor.