If you made a claim for $125 from Equifax, you're not getting it after court awards nearly $80 million to attorneys

Authored by cnbc.com and submitted by plato_thyself

If you filed for a cash payout from Equifax as part of the credit bureau's settlement for its massive 2017 data breach, you're probably not getting anywhere close to $125.

On Thursday, Dec. 19, a Georgia federal judge awarded $77.5 million to the attorneys representing the class of consumers against Equifax. That's over 20% of the roughly $380 million settlement fund Equifax agreed to set up to directly help consumers affected by the breach, according to the Hamilton Lincoln Law Institute, which house the Center for Class Action Fairness and opposed the high fee award.

It's also one more reason why the consumers who sought a cash settlement from Equifax won't be getting the full $125 as initially expected. In fact, consumers were never going to get $125, says Ted Frank, director of litigation for Hamilton Lincoln. "That's down to $6 or $7 [per consumer] now. Maybe even less than that," he tells CNBC Make It.

In July, credit bureau Equifax agreed to pay a total of nearly $700 million for its role in the massive 2017 data breach, which impacted 147 million consumers. The settlement included a $380.5 million restitution fund dedicated to consumer compensation and fees associated with the case.

Under the terms of the settlement, affected consumers could potentially get up to $20,000 in reimbursement. But even if you didn't suffer any direct harm from the breach, you could claim free credit monitoring or a cash payout of up to $125 if you already have credit services in place.

But the Federal Trade Commission announced in late July that because of the high interest in the cash compensation option, consumers who picked the payout might end up getting far less than $125. It turned out that the money set aside in the roughly $380 million restitution fund specifically for cash compensation was capped at $31 million, so if more than 248,000 consumers picked this option, the total compensation for each would be less.

In fact, the FTC took the unusual step of urging consumers to pick the free credit monitoring instead of the cash payment, saying the service was worth "hundreds of dollars" and comes with identity theft insurance and restoration services.

And then in September, consumers who filed for the $125 cash payout were sent an email with the subject line: "Your Equifax Claim: You Must Act by October 15, 2019 or Your Claim for Alternative Compensation Will Be Denied." Under the new requirements, consumers had two options: verify their claim by providing more information or amend their paperwork to opt for a non-cash settlement.

If consumers failed to file the additional information before Oct. 15, 2019, the notice said their claim would be completely rejected.

Now Thursday's ruling puts that $125 award amount even further out of reach, Frank says. "Class counsel in their briefing said that [consumers] were never going to get $125, and they blamed the media for it. But that's absolutely not what the press releases said, and there was a reason people thought they were getting $125."

"The FTC let themselves get snookered by the class counsel into believing how good this settlement was. That's why their press was misleading," Frank says. "It's unfortunate because they're supposed to looking out for consumers here and instead they signed off on a settlement where the beneficiaries are really the attorneys."

Requests for comments from the class counsel were not immediately returned.

Like this story? Subscribe to CNBC Make It on YouTube!

FutureShock25 on December 19th, 2019 at 22:56 UTC »

What pisses me off the most about this is that dealing with Equifax is basically non optional for the majority of people.

TrumpPooPoosPants on December 19th, 2019 at 22:55 UTC »

It is a near certainty that they caused more monetary damage than the total value of their company, and not because of talented hackers, but because Equifax was horrifically inept at protecting data - data which was their sole product and concern as a business. They should be bankrupt.

johnny_utah16 on December 19th, 2019 at 22:03 UTC »

Fuck equifax. They should’ve been more secure, these execs know they have no consequences for cost cutting on their security measures.

https://www.justice.gov/usao-ndga/pr/former-equifax-employee-sentenced-insider-trading

https://www.google.com/amp/s/qz.com/1097293/the-equifax-breach-happened-because-todays-executives-know-theyve-got-nothing-to-fear/amp/