Young Children Receiving Housing Vouchers Had Lower Hospital Spending Into Adulthood

Authored by jhsph.edu and submitted by mvea

Young Children Receiving Housing Vouchers Had Lower Hospital Spending Into Adulthood

Receiving a housing voucher during childhood was also significantly associated with fewer hospitalizations over time

Young children whose household received a housing voucher were admitted to the hospital fewer times and incurred lower hospital costs in the subsequent two decades than children whose households did not receive housing vouchers, according to a new study from researchers at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.

The study was published online December 3 in JAMA.

The findings, which tracked hospitalizations over time after households participated in a voucher program, are potentially relevant for the approximately four million children living in low-income households receiving Housing and Urban Development assistance, the researchers say.

The study found that children age 12 or under whose household received a housing voucher had 27 percent lower spending on hospitalizations—nearly $200 per year—than children whose household did not receive a housing voucher. Children 12 or younger whose family received a housing voucher were hospitalized 18 percent less than children whose family did not during the follow-up period. Moving to a lower-poverty neighborhood was linked with lower health care spending and fewer hospital admissions for younger children. The study did not find comparable savings or fewer hospitalizations in older children or in adults whose households received housing vouchers to move to lower-poverty neighborhoods.

The study used data collected by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development in an experimental program—the Moving To Opportunity for Fair Housing Demonstration Project—that gave low-income families living in public housing the chance to move with a housing voucher. Researchers linked households with insurance and hospital data representing 11 years to 21 years after enrollment in the program.

“While the long-term financial benefits of helping young children move out of high-poverty neighborhoods has increasingly been recognized, these findings underscore the potentially significant health impacts,” says lead author Craig Evan Pollack, MD, associate professor in the Bloomberg School’s Department of Health Policy and Management. “The fact that we see lower hospital spending over such a long follow-up period suggests the enduring importance of helping young children live in opportunity neighborhoods.”

The Moving to Opportunity for Fair Housing Demonstration Project enrolled 4,604 families living in public housing developments or in high-poverty neighborhoods in Baltimore, Boston, Chicago, Los Angeles, and New York from 1994 to 1998. Families were randomly selected to 1) receive a housing voucher that needed to be used in a low-poverty neighborhood, 2) receive a housing voucher without neighborhood restrictions, or 3) were assigned to a control group.

The study sample focused on 4,072 adults and 9,118 children ages 18 years or younger at the time of receiving the housing voucher. Children under 18 were then divided by age, 13 years and older and 12 and under, and by gender. Households were followed up to 21 years after enrolling in the Moving to Opportunity for Fair Housing Demonstration Project.

Researchers linked participants to hospital discharge and Medicaid data to evaluate the association of housing vouchers with hospital utilization and spending among children and adults from 1995 to 2015, depending on city and health records. The study focused on the number of annual hospitalizations, the number of inpatient hospital days per year, and total annual hospital spending for adults, children under 18, and children under 13.

Researchers found that children under 18 whose family received a housing voucher had an 18 percent reduction in annual hospital spending compared to children who did not receive a housing voucher ($633 dollars compared to $785). They also found that there was a 15 percent lower rate of hospitalizations for children under 18 who received a housing voucher. For every 10 percentage point reduction in neighborhood poverty—e.g., moving from a neighborhood where 40 percent of the households lived below the poverty line to one with 30 percent below the poverty line—households, on average, spent $152 less per year in the hospital on children under 18.

There were no significant associations with rates of hospitalizations, number of hospital days, or annual spending in adults.

On average, adults were 32 years old at the time they received a housing voucher. Sixty-four percent were black, and 32 percent were Hispanic. About a quarter of the adult study sample were employed and about a third (37 percent) had a high school diploma. Children were 8 years old on average at the time the household received a housing voucher. Sixty-five percent identified as black and approximately 31 percent were Hispanic.

“Reducing the level of poverty that children are exposed to in the neighborhoods where they grow up may be one way to lower health care costs,” explains Pollack. “Housing policies should take into account the potential implications for health care use over the long run.”

The study was supported by funding from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, the Hopkins Population Research Center, and the Johns Hopkins Division of General Internal Medicine.

“Association of Receipt of a Housing Voucher with Subsequent Hospital Utilization and Spending” was written by Craig E. Pollack, Amanda L. Blackford, Shawn Du, Stefanie Deluca, Rachel L. J. Thornton, and Bradley Herring.

Media contacts for the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health: Caitlin Hoffman at 410-955-7624 or [email protected] and Barbara Benham at 410-614-6029 or [email protected].

clamps12345 on December 5th, 2019 at 06:59 UTC »

To me this looks like some poor can afford doctor visits rather rather than ER visits. Reasonable healthcare is out of reach for many so they turn to different avenues. For me personally I don't have kids so the government says my service industry job is enough to provide for myself. I haven't been to a dentist in 20 years, and when I get sick I have to go to med check centers that treat me like a junky looking for a script.

SeattleSometimes on December 5th, 2019 at 06:18 UTC »

I work in this field- things like this are attributed to what are called Social Determinants of Health. The one issue I see in West Coast Cities like Seattle and SF is the straight up lack of affordable housing compared to wages. Identifying a need for housing is great but if there is not available housing, or lack of housing with supportive services, you’re going to be stuck in resolving the issues.

mvea on December 5th, 2019 at 01:28 UTC »

The title of the post is a copy and paste from the first and sixth paragraphs of the linked academic press release here:

Young children whose household received a housing voucher were admitted to the hospital fewer times and incurred lower hospital costs in the subsequent two decades than children whose households did not receive housing vouchers, according to a new study from researchers at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.

While the long-term financial benefits of helping young children move out of high-poverty neighborhoods has increasingly been recognized, these findings underscore the potentially significant health impacts

Journal Reference:

Pollack CE, Blackford AL, Du S, Deluca S, Thornton RLJ, Herring B.

Association of Receipt of a Housing Voucher With Subsequent Hospital Utilization and Spending.

JAMA. 2019;322(21):2115–2124.

Link: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2756289

doi:https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.17432

Key Points

Question Is receipt of a housing voucher associated with subsequent rates of hospital utilization and spending in long-term follow-up?

Findings In this exploratory analysis that included 4072 adults and 9118 children with a median 11 years of follow-up, adults randomized to receive a housing voucher, compared with a control group, did not experience significant differences in outcomes (rates of hospitalization, 14.0 vs 14.7 per 100 person-years; hospital days, 62.8 vs 67.0 per 100 person-years; yearly spending, $2075 vs $1977). Children whose families received a housing voucher compared with a control group without a voucher had significantly lower rates of hospitalization (6.3 vs 7.3 per 100 person-years) and yearly inpatient spending ($633 vs $785), without a significant difference in hospital days (25.7 vs 28.8 per 100 person-years).

Meaning Receipt of a housing voucher was not associated with significant differences in hospital use or spending among adults; however, children whose family received a voucher had significantly lower rates of hospitalization and inpatient spending during long-term follow-up.

Abstract

Importance Although neighborhoods are thought to be an important health determinant, evidence for the relationship between neighborhood poverty and health care use is limited, as prior studies have largely used observational data without an experimental design.

Objective To examine whether housing policies that reduce exposure to high-poverty neighborhoods were associated with differences in long-term hospital use among adults and children.

Design, Setting, and Participants Exploratory analysis of the Moving to Opportunity for Fair Housing Demonstration Program, a randomized social experiment conducted in 5 US cities. From 1994 to 1998, 4604 families in public housing were randomized to 1 of 3 groups: a control condition, a traditional Section 8 voucher toward rental costs in the private market, or a voucher that could only be used in low-poverty neighborhoods. Participants were linked to all-payer hospital discharge data (1995 through 2014 or 2015) and Medicaid data (1999 through 2009). The final follow-up date ranged from 11 to 21 years after randomization.

Exposures Receipt of a traditional or low-poverty voucher vs control group.

Main Outcomes and Measures Rates of hospitalizations and hospital days, and hospital spending.

Results Among 4602 eligible individuals randomized as adults, 4072 (88.5%) were linked to health data (mean age, 33 years [SD, 9.0 years]; 98% female; median follow-up, 11 years). There were no significant differences in primary outcomes among adults randomized to receive a voucher compared with the control group (unadjusted hospitalization rate, 14.0 vs 14.7 per 100 person-years, adjusted incidence rate ratio [IRR], 0.95 [95% CI, 0.84-1.08; P = .45]; hospital days, 62.8 vs 67.0 per 100 person-years; IRR, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.77-1.13; P = .46]; yearly spending, $2075 vs $1977; adjusted difference, −$129 [95% CI, −$497 to $239; P = .49]). Among 11 290 eligible individuals randomized as children, 9118 (80.8%) were linked to health data (mean age, 8 years [SD, 4.6 years]; 49% female; median follow-up, 11 years). Receipt of a housing voucher during childhood was significantly associated with lower hospitalization rates (6.3 vs 7.3 per 100 person-years; IRR, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.73-0.99; P = .03]) and yearly inpatient spending ($633 vs $785; adjusted difference, −$143 [95% CI, −$256 to −$31; P = .01]) and no significant difference in hospital days (25.7 vs 28.8 per 100 person-years; IRR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.77-1.11; P = .41]).

Conclusions and Relevance In this exploratory analysis of a randomized housing voucher intervention, adults who received a housing voucher did not experience significant differences in hospital use or spending. Receipt of a voucher during childhood was significantly associated with lower rates of hospitalization and less inpatient spending during long-term follow-up.