Thousands of ships fitted with ‘cheat devices’ to divert poisonous pollution into sea

Authored by independent.co.uk and submitted by Vorbitor

Global shipping companies have spent billions rigging vessels with “cheat devices” that circumvent new environmental legislation by dumping pollution into the sea instead of the air, The Independent can reveal.

More than $12bn (£9.7bn) has been spent on the devices, known as open-loop scrubbers, which extract sulphur from the exhaust fumes of ships that run on heavy fuel oil.

This means the vessels meet standards demanded by the International Maritime Organisation (IMO) that kick in on 1 January.

We’ll tell you what’s true. You can form your own view. From 15p €0.18 $0.18 USD 0.27 a day, more exclusives, analysis and extras.

However, the sulphur emitted by the ships is simply re-routed from the exhaust and expelled into the water around the ships, which not only greatly increases the volume of pollutants being pumped into the sea, but also increases carbon dioxide emissions.

The change could have a devastating effect on wildlife in British waters and around the world, experts have warned.

Shape Created with Sketch. Coral reefs: Trying to combat climate change damage Show all 25 left Created with Sketch. right Created with Sketch. Shape Created with Sketch. Coral reefs: Trying to combat climate change damage 1/25 Masked Butterflyfish (Chaetodon semilarvatus) swimming over a bommie reef in the Egyptian Red Sea marine reserve of Ras Mohamed, off the southern tip of the Sinai peninsula AFP/Getty 2/25 Rising sea temperatures cause corals to bleach (go white) and die Getty/iStock 3/25 A giant clam is seen nestled among coral reefs at the Obhor coast, 30 kms north of the Red Sea city of Jeddah AFP/Gett 4/25 Coral reef in seychelles that has degraded After the reef has died they break up and become rubble. On this reef there is some regrowth of young corals so there is hope for recovery Getty 5/25 Coral gardening A rabbitfish in a net H Goehlich 6/25 A school of fish and a sea can in a healthy coral reef off the coast of Isla Mujeres, Mexico Getty/Lumix 7/25 Sky views of great barrier reef in Australia Getty/iStock 8/25 A fish swims among coral reefs at the Obhor coast AFP/Getty 9/25 Researchers from the Interuniversity Institute for Marine Sciences in the southern Israeli resort city Eilat monitor coral growth while scuba diving in the Red Sea AFP/Getty 10/25 Coral gardening A rope nursery Nature Seychelles 11/25 Fish swimming off the coast of Egypt's Red Sea resort of Hurghada. The rebounding tourism sector is worrisome for the fragile marine ecosystem AFP/Getty 12/25 Coral gardening A parrotfish on the reef C Reveret 13/25 Gorgonian sea fan on a a coral reef in the Egyptian Red Sea marine reserve of Ras Mohamed AFP/Getty 14/25 A diver swims during a Great Barrier Reef experience on Lady Elliot Island, Australia Getty/Tourism Queensland 15/25 Jessica Bellsworthy, a PhD student conducting research on the coral reefs of the Gulf of Eilat, holds a coral in an aquarium at the Interuniversity Institute for Marine Sciences in Eilat AFP/Getty 16/25 Coral reefs in the water off the Obhor coast, 30 kms north of the Red Sea city of Jeddah in 2008 AFP/Getty 17/25 A diver photographs golden anthias (Pseudanthias aurulentus) on a coral reef in the Egyptian Red Sea marine reserve of Ras Mohamed AFP/Getty 18/25 Getty/Lumix 19/25 AFP/Getty 20/25 Coral gardening A damselfish Sarah Frias-Torres 21/25 Divers swim past a coral reef in the Egyptian Red Sea marine reserve AFP/Getty 22/25 A puffer fish hovering above coral in the Egyptian Red Sea marine reserve AFP/Getty 23/25 Researchers from the Interuniversity Institute for Marine Sciences in the southern Israeli resort city Eilat monitor coral growth while scuba diving on June 12, 2017 in the Red Sea off Eilat. Global warming has in recent years caused colourful coral reefs to bleach and die around the world -- but not in the Gulf of Eilat, or Aqaba, part of the northern Red Sea. At the Interuniversity Institute for Marine Sciences in southern Israeli resort city Eilat, dozens of aquariums have been lined up in rows just off the Red Sea shore containing samples of local corals AFP/Getty 24/25 AFP/Getty 25/25 fish swimming off the coast of Egypt's Red Sea resort of Hurghada AFP/Getty 1/25 Masked Butterflyfish (Chaetodon semilarvatus) swimming over a bommie reef in the Egyptian Red Sea marine reserve of Ras Mohamed, off the southern tip of the Sinai peninsula AFP/Getty 2/25 Rising sea temperatures cause corals to bleach (go white) and die Getty/iStock 3/25 A giant clam is seen nestled among coral reefs at the Obhor coast, 30 kms north of the Red Sea city of Jeddah AFP/Gett 4/25 Coral reef in seychelles that has degraded After the reef has died they break up and become rubble. On this reef there is some regrowth of young corals so there is hope for recovery Getty 5/25 Coral gardening A rabbitfish in a net H Goehlich 6/25 A school of fish and a sea can in a healthy coral reef off the coast of Isla Mujeres, Mexico Getty/Lumix 7/25 Sky views of great barrier reef in Australia Getty/iStock 8/25 A fish swims among coral reefs at the Obhor coast AFP/Getty 9/25 Researchers from the Interuniversity Institute for Marine Sciences in the southern Israeli resort city Eilat monitor coral growth while scuba diving in the Red Sea AFP/Getty 10/25 Coral gardening A rope nursery Nature Seychelles 11/25 Fish swimming off the coast of Egypt's Red Sea resort of Hurghada. The rebounding tourism sector is worrisome for the fragile marine ecosystem AFP/Getty 12/25 Coral gardening A parrotfish on the reef C Reveret 13/25 Gorgonian sea fan on a a coral reef in the Egyptian Red Sea marine reserve of Ras Mohamed AFP/Getty 14/25 A diver swims during a Great Barrier Reef experience on Lady Elliot Island, Australia Getty/Tourism Queensland 15/25 Jessica Bellsworthy, a PhD student conducting research on the coral reefs of the Gulf of Eilat, holds a coral in an aquarium at the Interuniversity Institute for Marine Sciences in Eilat AFP/Getty 16/25 Coral reefs in the water off the Obhor coast, 30 kms north of the Red Sea city of Jeddah in 2008 AFP/Getty 17/25 A diver photographs golden anthias (Pseudanthias aurulentus) on a coral reef in the Egyptian Red Sea marine reserve of Ras Mohamed AFP/Getty 18/25 Getty/Lumix 19/25 AFP/Getty 20/25 Coral gardening A damselfish Sarah Frias-Torres 21/25 Divers swim past a coral reef in the Egyptian Red Sea marine reserve AFP/Getty 22/25 A puffer fish hovering above coral in the Egyptian Red Sea marine reserve AFP/Getty 23/25 Researchers from the Interuniversity Institute for Marine Sciences in the southern Israeli resort city Eilat monitor coral growth while scuba diving on June 12, 2017 in the Red Sea off Eilat. Global warming has in recent years caused colourful coral reefs to bleach and die around the world -- but not in the Gulf of Eilat, or Aqaba, part of the northern Red Sea. At the Interuniversity Institute for Marine Sciences in southern Israeli resort city Eilat, dozens of aquariums have been lined up in rows just off the Red Sea shore containing samples of local corals AFP/Getty 24/25 AFP/Getty 25/25 fish swimming off the coast of Egypt's Red Sea resort of Hurghada AFP/Getty

A total of 3,756 ships, both in operation and under order, have already had scrubbers installed according to DNV GL, the world’s largest ship classification company.

Only 23 of these vessels have had closed-loop scrubbers installed, a version of the device that does not discharge into the sea and stores the extracted sulphur in tanks before discharging it at a safe disposal facility in a port.

The Exhaust Gas Cleaning System Association has estimated that 4,000 ships will be operating with scrubbers by the time the legislation is enforced, up from fewer than a hundred in 2013.

The ships that have been quickest to adopt the devices are the larger vessels, such as bulk carriers, container ships and oil tankers, which have the biggest engines and have historically been the worst polluters.

For every ton of fuel burned, ships using open-loop scrubbers emit approximately 45 tons of warm, acidic, contaminated washwater containing carcinogens including polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and heavy metals, according to the International Council on Clean Transportation (ICCT), a non-profit organisation that provides scientific analysis to environmental regulators.

Increasing volumes of wastewater will create toxic sediment around ports and could have a devastating effect on the wildlife in British waters, according to Lucy Gilliam, a campaigner for Transport and Environment, a Brussels-based NGO.

“In the North Sea and some parts of the Channel, the water quality has already been heavily degraded,” she said.

“Wildlife in these areas is likely to be far more vulnerable to the effects of having ships discharging huge volumes of acidic, polluted, warm water from scrubbers.

“As things stand, far too few parameters are covered by the existing IMO criteria for permitted discharge from scrubbers.”

Heavy metal pollution has been connected to damage to the central nervous system in humans and animals while PAHs have been blamed for skin, lung, bladder, liver, and stomach cancers.

The increasing acidification of the world’s waters is killing coral reefs, something scientific studies have warned threatens entire oceanic food chains.

Bryan Comer, a senior researcher at ICCT, said the use of scrubbers by cruise ships is a particular concern.

The ICCT has estimated that cruise ships with scrubbers will consume around 4 million tons of heavy fuel oil in 2020 and will discharge 180 million tons of contaminated scrubber washwater overboard.

“About half of the world’s roughly 500 cruise ships have or will soon have scrubbers installed,” said Mr Comer. “Cruise ships operate in some of the most beautiful and pristine areas on the planet, making this all the more concerning.”

Scrubbers generally cost between £1.6m and £8.1m depending on the vessel – and the adoption of this technology has cost billions of dollars over recent years, according to Mr Comer.

“If you are conservative and say that ships are spending about $3m (£2.4m) per ship to instal scrubbers, at 4,000 ships that’s $12bn (£9.7bn) dollars of investment in a technology that enables ships to use the world’s dirtiest fossil fuel – heavy fuel oil.

“Worse, scrubbers increase fuel consumption by about 2 per cent, increasing carbon dioxide emissions.

“Imagine how far $12bn could have gone if it was applied towards developing and deploying technologies for zero-emission vessels.”

Under IMO regulations, ships are permitted to use open-loop scrubbers as what they call “equivalents”. These are defined as: “Any fitting, material, appliance or apparatus to be fitted in a ship or other procedures, alternative fuel oils, or compliance methods used as an alternative to that required.”

In statement to The Independent, the IMO said: “The intention behind that idea of equivalents is to allow for innovation.”

Though IMO member states have approved the use of open-loop scrubbers to meet the incoming sulphur cap, some regional ports have introduced rules to prevent their use.

In January, the UAE’s Port of Fujairah announced a ban on the use of open-loop scrubbers in its waters.

In July, China said it would extend a ban scrubber discharges to cover all coastal regions within 12 nautical miles from China’s territorial sea and regions near the southern island province of Hainan.

Authorities in Belgium, Germany, Ireland and the US have also implemented bans on scrubber discharge in some regions.

In May, EU member states made a submission to the IMO’s Marine Environment Protection Committee calling for it to develop a set of “harmonised rules” on the areas and conditions under which scrubbers can discharge.

In response, the committee appointed a team to assess the available evidence relating to the environmental impact of discharges from scrubbers. This team is due to present its findings in February 2020.

In a statement issued to The Independent, the IMO said it had already “adopted strict criteria for discharge of washwater from exhaust gas cleaning systems”.

It added that it is “undertaking a review of the 2015 guidelines on exhaust gas cleaning systems. The guidelines include, among other things, washwater discharge standards.”

mudpilot on September 30th, 2019 at 10:07 UTC »

Many ships are not fitting scrubbers at all. Instead they are choosing to burn cleaner fuel. This is of course more expensive, and makes those ships less competitive.

If you are concerned, there is something you can do: the rules that allow this to occur are set by the International Maritime Organisation. IMO meets under the umbrella of the UN to agree international shipping rules. Problem is that it is consensus based, so countries like China, Panama, Liberia and other shipping flag of convenience states will drag their heels until low thresholds are agreed.

BUT: each country that is party to the agreement then passes it into their own laws. There is nothing to stop a country setting higher standards. This would prevent ships from countries that operate to the lower standard visiting their ports.

This happened in the USA after the Exxon Valdez tanker oil spill. The US set unilateral rules requiring double hulled tankers, with no consultation with IMO. Within 5 years single hulled tankers were uneconomic as they could not carry cargo to or from the states.

Lobby your maritime authorities (US Coast Guard, UK Marine and Coastguard Agency for example). Lobby your representatives. Get your environmental activists to lean on these bodies.

Demand your governments refuse access to these ships within your waters.

JMS144 on September 30th, 2019 at 09:16 UTC »

The 15 largest ships in the world emit more nitrogen oxide and sulfur oxide than the world’s 760 million cars. I can only imagine what our future holds.

Reeburn on September 30th, 2019 at 08:39 UTC »

3756 ships out of roughly 53000 ships that exist worldwide. Ships-wise alone that's a pretty significant percentage.