UT Study: How Happy Couples Argue

Authored by news.utk.edu and submitted by mvea
image for UT Study: How Happy Couples Argue

In marriage, conflict is inevitable. Even the happiest couples argue. And research shows they tend to argue about the same topics as unhappy couples: children, money, in-laws, intimacy.

So, what distinguishes happy couples? According to “What are the Marital Problems of Happy Couples? A Multi-method, Two-Sample Investigation,” a study published this August in Family Process, it is the way happy couples argue that may make a difference.

“Happy couples tend to take a solution-oriented approach to conflict, and this is clear even in the topics that they choose to discuss,” said lead author Amy Rauer, associate professor of child and family studies and director of the Relationships and Development Lab in the College of Education, Health, and Human Sciences.

Rauer and three colleagues—Allen Sabey of Northwestern University, Christine Proulx of the University of Missouri, and Brenda Volling of the University of Michigan— observed two samples of couples who describe themselves as happily married. Fifty-seven of the couples were in their mid- to late 30s and had been married an average of nine years; 64 of the couples were in their early 70s and had been married an average of 42 years.

Couples in both samples similarly ranked their most and least serious issues. Intimacy, leisure, household, communication, and money were the most serious, as well as health for the older couples; couples in both samples ranked jealousy, religion, and family as the least serious.

When researchers observed couples discussing marital problems, all couples focused on issues with clearer solutions, such as the distribution of household labor and how to spend leisure time.

“Re-balancing chores may not be easy, but it lends itself to more concrete solutions than other issues,” Rauer said. “One spouse could do more of certain chores to balance the scales.”

The couples rarely chose to argue about issues that are more difficult to resolve. And Rauer suggests that this strategic decision may be one of the keys to their marital success.

“Focusing on the perpetual, more-difficult-to-solve problems may undermine partners’ confidence in the relationship,” Rauer said.

Instead, to the extent it is possible, focusing first on more solvable problems may be an effective way to build up both partners’ sense of security in the relationship.

“If couples feel that they can work together to resolve their issues, it may give them the confidence to move on to tackling the more difficult issues,” Rauer said.

As to which issues may be more difficult to resolve, couples avoided discussing challenges regarding their spouse’s health and physical intimacy. These issues may be more difficult to address without challenging their partner’s sense of competence or making the partner feel vulnerable or embarrassed, resulting in more conflict.

“Since these issues tend to be more difficult to resolve, they are more likely to lead to less marital happiness or the dissolution of the relationship, especially if couples have not banked up any previous successes solving other marital issues,” Rauer said.

Researchers also found that couples who were married longer reported fewer serious issues and argued less overall. This is consistent with previous research suggesting that older partners’ perceptions of spending less time with each other may lead them to prioritize their marriage and decide some issues are not worth the argument.

In other words, couples may want to choose their battles wisely, according to Rauer.

“Being able to successfully differentiate between issues that need to be resolved versus those that can be laid aside for now may be one of the keys to a long-lasting, happy relationship.”

PollyAmory on September 17th, 2019 at 18:13 UTC »

A "we're on the same team" versus "on opposing teams" mentality - it makes sense that the mindset of working toward a goal together leads to longer, stronger relationships.

lab52 on September 17th, 2019 at 17:10 UTC »

"and rarely chose to argue about issues that are more difficult to resolve" - does that mean they just... didn't argue about things? like they just said to themselves "ehhh it's not worth it" ? how do i obtain this power.

BoBoZoBo on September 17th, 2019 at 16:58 UTC »

Dr. John Gottman was able to predict with nearly 90% accuracy, which couples would get a divorce, simply by the way they argued. He worked with a mathematician on it and developed a formula which was so accurate and could be applied so broadly, it was even able to predict when countries would go from rhetorical and trade conflict, to all out war. It can be applied to any entity having a dispute, absolutely amazing.

His finding were that it really came down to two things:

Could they stay on topic, and discuss the heart/cause of the problem as opposed to the manifested facets. Could they discuss the disease, and not just the symptoms, and Were they respectful in their discourse, or did they degrade to personal attacks that did not address the issue at hand.

Choosing your battles strategically is definitely the key, as many people argue about how they feel, as opposed to what the heart of the problem is, or they make fights out of things that should not be an issue.

Thought I am curious as to what "more difficult to resolve" means here. Dr. Gottman's finding are that this is exactly what should be address, the real issues (which are usually the ones that are more difficult to resolve), and that people usually default to fighting over nonsense precisely because they want to avoid the tougher talks, or don't know how to address them.

Edit - Wow - Thank you for the Platinum kind stranger.