Everything wrong with Armageddon

Authored by everydaysciencestuff.com and submitted by Boredguy32
image for Everything wrong with Armageddon

I have to word this very carefully. Do you really want to mess with Harry Stamper? I mean, he shot a person with a shotgun at close range on an oil rig all because his daughter had limited options and thought Ben Affleck would be a good choice in boyfriend. Armageddon is a great movie.. but.. not so great when you’re overly science-y minded 🙁We all know that Bruce Willis is the savior of Earth from an older article which answers some of the movies’ plot points with real scientific answers. On my older article, I quoted that NASA shows the 1998 film Armageddon to its management training hirees, and they have to pick out all of the inaccuracies in order to get hired. Whether they actually don’t get the job because they only managed to get 167 out of the 168 is a closely guarded secret. So what exactly is wrong with the film? I’m not going to list all 168 (NASA quoted amount), because I don’t want to be here all day writing this.. so here’s 15 🙂

These are in no particular order of the films’ events.

The ship crash lands on the asteroid, and the surviving crew assesses the damage. A lot of it is on fire. The asteroid has no atmosphere to contain Oxygen required to cause the fires. A near perfect vacuum wouldn’t even spark. Speaking of being in vacuum, how did that ship take off at the end when there’s no air or anything to provide lift on the wings? Firing that big jet at the ass-end of the rocket would cause it to go forward like when you step on the gas in your car. The ship is supposed to be sterilized, hence the pre-boarding crew being in clean suits and what not, yet Steve Buscemi’s character is seen flicking a fly away while on the asteroid. You can see presumably the same fly in other scenes in the movie, on control panels, and other areas. The vibrations, among many other reasons why, of a spaceship taking off from a platform would cause the other ship to destroy itself. Let’s not forget all that uncontrollable fire, steam and debris all over the place 😛 Nine and a half G’s of pressure for any amount of time would cause a human to pass out. Wearing a G-suit or not, no helmet would cause the body to disperse this pressure, and they’d pass out. The crew is screaming during this scene. The “dark side” of almost any body in space is usually about zero Kelvin, or roughly -273 degrees Celsius. Firing a gatling gun on a low gravity environment would not only cause the gun to explode (absolute zero cold barrels firing an explosive round), the item the gun is attached too, the spaceship in this case, would go flying backwards at nearly the same speed as the bullet leaving the barrel. F=MA folks 🙂 The fuel the spaceships use, after refueling at the MIR wannabe Russian space station, is Liquid Oxygen. Liquid Oxygen is the Oxidizer of the fuel. Liquid Hydrogen is the fuel. They had none of that on board, so the ship refueled with what is essentially putting water in your gas tank instead of gasoline/diesel. Spaceships don’t bank and turn in space like fighter jets. Come on Michael Bay.. get your shit together.. The size of the Asteroid coming from Earth is “the size of Texas”, or roughly 400,000 square kilometres. An impact of that size would vaporise the entire Pacific ocean nearly instantly. The plasma generated instantly after that would sterilize the entire planet within 30 seconds or less. You’d not hear the explosion or feel the impact, because you’d be dead, regardless of where you are on the planet. Deep underground, up on the ISS, or in the middle of the Atlantic; it doesn’t matter.. you’re toast.. warm buttery toast.. mmmmmmm… AJ’s glove is torn from something that happened during impact of the first shuttle. In a pressurized suit, why is there not a decompression happening here? Also, it’s a vacuum, why are his fingers still perfectly fine? (Related: What would happen if you were floating in space without a spacesuit?) During the scene showing everyone praying and doing stuff to prepare for “the end”, it’s daylight everywhere. Simulating gravity on MIR in the way that was portrayed would apply so much pressure and centripetal force on the shuttle, that it would tear the station apart. The centre of the space station would be balanced and have a microgravity environment. Speaking of the MIRish space station; when it’s blowing up, a piece breaks off and crashes through and splits off from the shuttle and station (“the arm of station breaks”). This would cause everyone running to shuttle, items inside the station, and more to go flying outwards during the decompression. No one could fight that decompression force, no matter how strong or how fast they’re running elsewhere. The space suits everyone’s wearing have thrusters to keep them on the surface of the asteroid, to make work easier. How are people not in suits walking normally elsewhere, such as on the space shuttle? There’s no real amount of gravity on the surface of the Asteroid. When drilling, you have to remove the debris you’re displacing, but they’re drilling “800 feet”, and yet, nothing is ever shown leaving the hole they’re drilling.

moschles on July 28th, 2019 at 17:37 UTC »

Out of all the things in the movie they should have gotten right, they get this one wrong.

Factual error: It's explained in detail how the impact will cause a horrible freak tide, what it will do, and that one half of mankind will die in the nuclear winter. That's absolutely irrelevant. The asteroid is "the size of Texas," that means a quarter of a million square miles. Such an impact is called ELE (Extinction Level Event). A bigger part of the Pacific Ocean would evaporate immediately, so no matter if a wave or not. The earth would become "sterilized." So no lifeform will live long enough to die in a winter. (So it is nonsensical to compare that impact with the event 65 million years ago. It's much different)

Sumit316 on July 28th, 2019 at 17:19 UTC »

"Armageddon" reportedly used the services of nine writers. Why did it need any? The dialogue is either shouted one-liners or romantic drivel. "It's gonna blow!" is used so many times, I wonder if every single writer used it once, and then sat back from his word processor with a contented smile on his face, another day's work done.

Roger Ebert didn't hold back in his review.

223specialist on July 28th, 2019 at 15:44 UTC »

I would totally watch this movie again with NASA commentary on the errors