Bernie Sanders on target saying 3 richest have as much wealth as bottom half of all Americans

Authored by politifact.com and submitted by DollarSmith4

"The wealthiest three families now own more wealth than the bottom half of the country."

In an opinion article he wrote for the Wall Street Journal, U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., called for an end to "corporate socialism" and made a claim about wealth inequality.

"The wealthiest three families now own more wealth than the bottom half of the country, and they will do everything they can to block our agenda," wrote Sanders, who is seeking the Democratic nomination for president.

The latest-available data back up his statement, and it appears the gap is widening.

A note about wealth, before we dig in:

Many Americans make a good income, have some savings and investments, and own a nice home. But they also have debt, typically from a mortgage, credit cards or other bills. The result is that even some people with relatively healthy incomes, as well as many poorer people, have a negative net worth — the more technical term for wealth.

Sanders’ campaign told us his claim is based on a 2017 study from the left-leaning Institute for Policy Studies. It used Forbes’ list of the 400 richest Americans and data from a gold-standard federal government source on wealth. Those are 2016 figures, from the Federal Reserve Board’s Survey of Consumer Finances, which are updated every three years.

The study found that the three wealthiest individuals were Bill Gates of Microsoft with $89 billion, Jeff Bezos of Amazon with $81.5 billion and Warren Buffett of Berkshire Hathaway with $78 billion.

Their total wealth of $248.5 billion was higher than the wealth of the bottom 160 million Americans, at $245 billion.

Despite Sanders’ suggestion that the three men would block his agenda, they have expressed centrist political views over the years, and Buffett was a well-known supporter of former President Barack Obama, a Democrat.

Whatever their views, Sanders is correct about their wealth, which is on the rise.

Forbes’ latest annual rankings for 2018 show Bezos, Gates and Buffett still ranked at Nos. 1, 2 and 3, respectively, and that their total wealth was $345 billion.

New federal figures for the bottom 160 million Americans aren’t expected to be released until sometime later in 2019.

For the 160 million people at the bottom of the scale, the study used the net worth figure reported by the Fed and then subtracted automobiles and other "durable goods" such as electronics, furniture, and household appliances, from that figure.

Subtracting durable goods from net worth "offers us a more accurate depiction of household wealth as these items are not easily sellable and neither appreciate nor hold constant their value," the study said.

University of Michigan sociology professor Fabian Pfeffer, whose research specialties include wealth inequality, was among a number of economists and wealth inequality experts who told us the federal figures used in the study are the best for assessing wealth in the population. He told us that the wealth gap is much greater in the United States than in other Western industrialized nations.

Pfeffer said the top 5% hold more than 70% of all net worth in the United States. That’s compared to 44% in Australia and Sweden, and lower figures in other comparable nations.

Sanders said, "The wealthiest three families now own more wealth than the bottom half of the country."

The latest available figures indicate that the total wealth of Gates, Bezos and Buffett was $248.5 billion, exceeding the total wealth of $245 billion of the bottom half of Americans.

avanross on July 3rd, 2019 at 18:17 UTC »

I dont understand how people who vote republican can value the interests of those THREE people over that of the entire rest of the country INCLUDING THEMSELVES.

Mindblowing, but when you mention “wealth inequality” to some people, they’ll react like you just told them that they are a pedophile and their mother was a serial killer. Anger and disbelief and denial.

FalstaffsMind on July 3rd, 2019 at 18:09 UTC »

The problem with that, is 3 people don't consume much. They don't buy 150 million tv sets, 150 million townhomes, 150 million new cars and 150 million porterhouse steaks. And our economy, despite all the stock market gazing, is driven by demand for consumer goods and services. That's where the jobs come from. That's why small business thrives. Which is my Adam Smith warned regarding inheritance...

"A power to dispose of estates for ever is manifestly absurd. The earth and the fulness of it belongs to every generation, and the preceding one can have no right to bind it up from posterity. Such extension of property is quite unnatural." Smith said: "There is no point more difficult to account for than the right we conceive men to have to dispose of their goods after death."

feedmefries on July 3rd, 2019 at 18:00 UTC »

Remember when WashPo tried to fact check this yesterday and gave Bernie 2 Pinocchios because the bottom half of the country has negative wealth (ie more debt than assets) so they shouldn't count?

Good grief.