Artist's Facebook disabled after posting 'MAGA hat collection'

Authored by ktvu.com and submitted by corginamedzelda
image for Artist's Facebook disabled after posting 'MAGA hat collection'

“ Only The Terrorized Own The Right To Name Symbols Of Terror” by artist Kate Kretz (Photo: Gregory Staley)

- Just 10 minutes before we spoke over the phone, Baltimore area-based artist Kate Kretz received a call from Benicia’s Jen Tough Gallery. She said they want to show her art in an upcoming exhibition this July. Her work is called ‘The MAGA Hat Collection’, part of a larger ongoing so-called #bullyculture series. But images of her work have led to her Facebook account to be disabled.

The hats from her collection--bold and crimson colored-- are the exact shade of red as any President Donald Trump MAGA hat--that’s because they’re actually made of them. One piece, “Hate Hat,” is actually more of a hood-- a Ku Klux Klan hood, made up of about 13 deconstructed, knockoff ‘Make America Great Again’ hats, with the exception of one, which she bought, only to make sure she had the right texture and color.

“I wanted to make sure I wasn’t putting any money in [Trump’s] pocket,” Kretz said. She did shell out $25 for one, which she purchased on Trump’s website. “Now I’m on his mailing list,” she said, explaining that it’s good to know your “enemies.”

The other deconstructed piece of MAGA ephemera is reconstructed into a swastika armband. This perhaps is what flagged Facebook to a possible hate-speech situation after she posted images of her work on her profile page. “ Only The Terrorized Own The Right To Name Symbols Of Terror” by artist Kate Kretz (Photo: Gregory Staley)

As she wrote in a lengthy post published this week on Medium; her art is meant to call out those who wear the hats and claim they are innocuous.

“I feel like when I drive to rural Pennsylvania and people driving have just the word ‘Trump’ on their car...it almost felt threatening to me. It’s become a verb. I have friends of color and gay friends who tense up when they see the MAGA hat. We’re in a dangerous place. History is repeating itself. It’s like we’re all walking around in a daze like we can’t believe it’s happening. Hate crimes are up since Trump has become president.”

Her current work literally rips MAGA hats apart and sews them back together into traditional symbols of hatred while examining the way the U.S. cultivates aggression and entitlement.

But Kretz is no stranger to controversy. Her homo-erotic ‘Gunlickers’ [NSFW] collection is just as it sounds: depictions of men licking their automatic weapons. She said she was called awful names by internet “trolls” for sharing this work.

Usually she’s careful with her private information on social media and is mindful of photos she puts out there, especially of family members. But after ‘Gunlickers,’ a photo of her holding her daughter in an interview setting was found. Whoever doctored it, covered her daughter with a Band-Aid and posted it on her social media.

She said it disturbed her, but she blocks the trolls.

“It’s scarier for a woman to do this than a man.” As she wrote on Medium, “None of the art I have produced is more disturbing than the things happening in real life that inspired me to make the work.”

In early May, Facebook removed Kretz’ images of her latest work for violating community standards. The artist protested, re-uploaded her images, but this time with a disclaimer stating that her art was not hate speech, and in fact was commentary on hate speech, much like a political cartoon.

“It’s really a giant mistake. I have no way of knowing if the trolls got together to report it, or if it was Facebook’s image software. Either someone saw an opportunity, or I’m a victim of a faulty system.”

Kretz described feeling powerless in her situation. “I have to be able to show my art. This is my business.”

For 30 years she’s been a working artist and has spent the last 10 years on Facebook where she posts images of her artwork. She likens the social media platform to her own carefully-curated mailing list.

“We provide a lot of content for them. I get a lot from Facebook, but I also give a lot. When you do business with someone you always get your work back. I have no recourse to get back my own info and content back from them.”

KTVU reached out to Facebook for comment on the vetting process and the timeline for the artist potentially getting her Facebook account reinstated, but has not heard back as of this writing.

For now, and for the past two weeks, she has checked in with Facebook every morning and fills out a form to have her page reviewed. “I keep hoping that a new person gets it. I haven’t accepted the fact that my page is gone. The way I’m being treated makes me feel that they don’t understand how their users are using their platform.”

Artist Kate Kretz' work will be shown at a solo exhibition at Jen Tough Gallery in Benicia July 13 through August 15. Opening reception Saturday, July 13 7 to 9 p.m.

stayintheshadows on May 26th, 2019 at 15:09 UTC »

Stop using Facebook you dolts.

baronvoncommentz on May 26th, 2019 at 14:35 UTC »

This isn't someone posting a photo of maga hats in a case. She altered Trump paraphernalia to make it look like nazi and white supremacist paraphernalia. This is political art.

The speculation is that Facebook auto flagged her Facebook because their algorithms spotted something that looked like hate speech. But we really don't know because Facebook isn't open about how and why they disable or ban people's accounts. But it seems from the article that any satire/art that cleaves too closely to a banned/forbidden subject will trigger a response from the FB platform.

This is also interesting in the wake of their decision not to ban a fake video of Nancy Pelosi.

EDIT: It does seem as if a brigade of reports could be a culprit - it's been used to attack other pages and groups for political reasons. And FB has a shit record of removing stuff that is blatantly alt-right and violent. And yes, calling for genocide is violent. And no, whataboutism arguments don't make any more sense here than they do elsewhere. Altering Trump hats to show their true colors (and presenting it as art) to using technology to alter a video of a politician speaking (and presenting it as factual) are fundamentally different things.

no_drama_obama_ on May 26th, 2019 at 13:30 UTC »

But I thought facebook wanted to let users decide?