Alabama Votes to Eliminate Marriage Licenses

Authored by lawandcrime.com and submitted by sstterry1
image for Alabama Votes to Eliminate Marriage Licenses

The Alabama House of Representatives just passed a bill that is a slap in the face to marriage equality. Since gay weddings are to be on equal footing with straight ones, Alabama will make all weddings meaningless.

Lawmakers have decided that Sections 22-9A-17, 30-1-5, 30-1-12, and 30-1-16 of the Code of Alabama should be amended to abolish any requirement that couples getting married obtain marriage licenses — or have even have wedding ceremonies at all. Now, those wishing to marry can just fill out some forms, submit them to the probate office, and emerge as spouse and spouse. Easy peasy.

The bill, which passed 67 to 26, was sponsored by Alabama State Sen. Greg Albritton (R), and has both the Alabama wedding industry and advocates for LGBT rights up in arms. While the law as amended would, in a technical sense, treat everyone equally, the change was clearly made to appease opponents of same-sex marriage.

“I feel like it was born out of prejudice,” said Alabama State Rep. Neil Rafferty (D), who voted against the bill. Rafferty is the only openly gay member of the Alabama House.

Lawmakers who supported the bill included Alabama State Rep. Wes Allen (R), a former probate judge, who stopped issuing marriage licenses in 2015 when the Supreme Court ruled that states must allow same-sex marriage.

Allen reverted to the classic, “I believe marriage is between a man and a woman,” and reminded the press that, in 2006, about 80 percent of Alabama voters approved a constitutional amendment restricting marriage to opposite-sex couples. Allen likened the signing of a marriage license to signing a check – saying, “you’re endorsing it.” Allen chose to made no reference to major legal precedents occurring a decade after 2006 that made same-sex marriage the law of the land.

Never one to put the legal rights of its citizens before discriminatory actions by its government officials, Alabama lawmakers sprang into action. Like a frustrated mom confiscating a toy from arguing children, the state legislature adopted a “Fine, now nobody gets it” system.

The bill now heads to Gov. Kay Ivey’s (R) desk to be signed into law. Governor Ivey has been making headlines of late in conjunction with her support of Alabama’s unprecedentedly restrictive abortion laws.

Governor Kay Ivey: Youth Against the Alabama Human Life Protection Act – Sign the Petition! https://t.co/uvQDNo3SQD via @Change — Anh Bui (@Panhbui) May 25, 2019

You may be asking: “Aren’t a whole bunch of people boycotting Alabama over those abortion laws?” and “Won’t eliminating weddings harm the state’s economy even more?”

Yep. That’s right. Some in the wedding business in Alabama worry that the legal change will make their entire industry obsolete.

Wedding venue owner Don Booze explained that under the new laws, “’I now pronounce you man and wife’ will be totally meaningless because that man and wife union happens at the courthouse.”

That’s certainly something of a plot twist.

Until now, it was supposed to be liberals who were hell-bent on destroying the concept of marriage. Wasn’t that what the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) was all about?

While Alabama’s legislature was tying up loose ends on its marriage laws, it made sure that teenagers could also benefit from this new no-license, no-wedding system. Under the amended statute, 16 and 17-year-olds are good to go as long as one parent sends a notarized affidavit to the probate court. Good to know the Yellowhammer State has its priorities straight.

This is an opinion piece. The views expressed in this article are those of just the author.

IUsedToBeACave on May 25th, 2019 at 16:06 UTC »

Now, those wishing to marry can just fill out some forms, submit them to the probate office, and emerge as spouse and spouse. Easy peasy.

Great! That is how it should work. The ceremonial aspect of a wedding is a cultural thing, and shouldn't be mandated by the government. From the government's perspective marriage should just be a mechanism where two humans agree to combine their resources, and as such are awarded certain legal statuses, and tax benefits.

Egorse on May 25th, 2019 at 15:40 UTC »

While Alabama’s legislature was tying up loose ends on its marriage laws, it made sure that teenagers could also benefit from this new no-license, no-wedding system. Under the amended statute, 16 and 17-year-olds are good to go as long as one parent sends a notarized affidavit to the probate court. Good to know the Yellowhammer State has its priorities straight.

elconquistador1985 on May 25th, 2019 at 15:39 UTC »

Imagine being such a hateful piece of shit that you just eliminate the concept of marriage because you hate hat gay people that much.