any system which provides killing power to the individual will have a cost associated, just like having cars will always carry with it a death toll of accidents.
The question is, is the cost worth it for the benefit of individuals holding "power" so that they could either theoretically overthrow an oppressor or more likely have the ability to defend their family and loved ones.
there is no universally correct answer, for some people its the cost of freedom and personal security, they trade one risk for another, the other side think its not worth it and consider the cost too high for the gain.
meat_popsicle13 on May 9th, 2019 at 01:08 UTC »
If people wouldn't have children, none of this would happen.
Captain_Warzone on May 9th, 2019 at 03:08 UTC »
any system which provides killing power to the individual will have a cost associated, just like having cars will always carry with it a death toll of accidents.
The question is, is the cost worth it for the benefit of individuals holding "power" so that they could either theoretically overthrow an oppressor or more likely have the ability to defend their family and loved ones.
there is no universally correct answer, for some people its the cost of freedom and personal security, they trade one risk for another, the other side think its not worth it and consider the cost too high for the gain.
Reaper_Grim_79 on May 9th, 2019 at 04:19 UTC »
What, the gun free zone signs work, don't they?