Let's make a deal - when our responsive layout goes live in a couple weeks, check it out and let me know how it feels on mobile. If you still want an app then and that app can provide functionality that the responsive site cannot (offline access excluded), then message me and let me know what that is. If there's a good use case that our responsive layout can't solve, I'm happy to consider it. Here’s what we have on our roadmap consuming time and resources that I need to weigh when evaluating its importance. (A mobile app isn’t so much as do we or don’t we, but what would get delayed if we did?)
responsive layout (been in works for well over a year, and about to go live any week now. will launch initially with our new cycling site that is in a private beta of sorts right now, going live in a week or two.) office renovation (not getting cancelled, major construction likely to start in a few months. Permitting with the city is just about to happen. While we’re not building it ourselves, we are setting up the new studio in it which will take time. front, soon to be studio) comprehensive benchmarks integrated into part selection (code infrastructure mostly done. Building renovation will be setting aside a portion of space for hardware. Not small - think like 100+ systems running concurrently all day, gathering loads of data with in-house data acquisition hardware. Waiting on the final word from MEP, but I'm 99% sure we're going to need the power company to upgrade the amperage to our building to pull this off.) on the site, a better ability to place what parts go where. Mixing and matching different GPU combinations. Also opens the door to later configuring water cooled systems, or other esoteric configurations. other small but important features that add up, like usb type c front panel support on cases, website dark mode, etc.
BFBLover on April 9th, 2019 at 01:10 UTC »
The site works perfectly fine for me? Are you experiencing an issue?
nullpassword on April 9th, 2019 at 02:39 UTC »
Apps are overrated.. make a mobile website.. Why should I have to use space on my freakin' phone/ pc do what a website would?
pcpartpicker on April 9th, 2019 at 03:00 UTC »
Let's make a deal - when our responsive layout goes live in a couple weeks, check it out and let me know how it feels on mobile. If you still want an app then and that app can provide functionality that the responsive site cannot (offline access excluded), then message me and let me know what that is. If there's a good use case that our responsive layout can't solve, I'm happy to consider it. Here’s what we have on our roadmap consuming time and resources that I need to weigh when evaluating its importance. (A mobile app isn’t so much as do we or don’t we, but what would get delayed if we did?)
responsive layout (been in works for well over a year, and about to go live any week now. will launch initially with our new cycling site that is in a private beta of sorts right now, going live in a week or two.) office renovation (not getting cancelled, major construction likely to start in a few months. Permitting with the city is just about to happen. While we’re not building it ourselves, we are setting up the new studio in it which will take time. front, soon to be studio) comprehensive benchmarks integrated into part selection (code infrastructure mostly done. Building renovation will be setting aside a portion of space for hardware. Not small - think like 100+ systems running concurrently all day, gathering loads of data with in-house data acquisition hardware. Waiting on the final word from MEP, but I'm 99% sure we're going to need the power company to upgrade the amperage to our building to pull this off.) on the site, a better ability to place what parts go where. Mixing and matching different GPU combinations. Also opens the door to later configuring water cooled systems, or other esoteric configurations. other small but important features that add up, like usb type c front panel support on cases, website dark mode, etc.