81 women sue California hospital that put cameras in delivery rooms

Authored by nbcnews.com and submitted by headee

Breaking News Emails Get breaking news alerts and special reports. The news and stories that matter, delivered weekday mornings.

April 3, 2019, 4:29 AM GMT By Alex Johnson

Scores of women have gone back to court alleging that a Southern California hospital that installed hidden cameras in three labor and delivery rooms violated their privacy while they were "emotionally and physically exposed, and at their most vulnerable."

The claim was first filed as a class action in 2016 but was denied class action status. It was refiled last week by 81 women who underwent procedures from July 2012 to June 2013, when the cameras were rolling at the Women's Center at Sharp Grossmont Hospital in La Mesa, a northeastern suburb of San Diego.

As it did in 2016, Sharp HealthCare, the hospital's nonprofit parent company, acknowledged in a statement Tuesday that it installed the motion-activated cameras and computer monitors, saying they were meant to catch the thief or thieves responsible for the disappearance of a powerful anesthetic from drug carts.

"Although the cameras were intended to record only individuals in front of the anesthesia carts removing drugs, others, including patients and medical personnel in the operating rooms, were at times visible to the cameras and recorded," the medical company said.

"We sincerely regret that our efforts to ensure medication security may have caused any distress to those we serve," it said, adding that images taken by the cameras "were used for this particular case only and have not been used again."

The new suit, which was filed Friday in San Diego County Superior Court, seeks unspecified damages at a jury trial for invasion of privacy, unlawful recording of confidential information, negligent infliction of emotional distress and breach of fiduciary duty involving as many as 1,800 women.

It alleges that patients' "most sensitive genital areas" were visible at times and that the cameras were positioned where they could sometimes record the women's faces.

"I am a mom of four girls. I lead by example," Jessica Lincoln, the lead complainant, told NBC San Diego. "I'm a pretty black-and-white person as far as what is right and what is wrong, and this is wrong."

Another complainant, Melissa Escalera, said she was secretly recorded while giving birth to her daughter by emergency cesarean section.

"When I arrived in an ambulance and was wheeled into the operating room on a gurney, my concern was with my daughter, who was in distress and coming six weeks early," Escalera said.

"I was not planning on having a baby that September 4th day," she said. "It was a highly stressful and emotional time for my family and my doctor. No one ever asked me to record one of my most tender, life-changing moments.

"I would have never agreed to be recorded in that vulnerable moment," she said.

Sharp said it couldn't comment further because of the litigation.

Mama_Chita on April 3rd, 2019 at 16:54 UTC »

I worked here. This was a terrible mess. Worse yet, the doctor they were after was suspended in another state and had actions against his license already. Not only that, but after he was caught on tape putting the propofol in his scrub pocket, his lawyer got him off saying that no one actually saw him leave the premises with it. His argument was he was using it throughout procedures and may have put it back later. So he got off anyway and all these poor women's bodies were filmed while they were anesthetized unknowingly. This footage was distributed to all the lawyers for the case. It was actually one of the lawyers who reported the HIPAA violation in the first place stating that it didn't seem appropriate that they were sent all this footage or naked patients to go through just to find one doctor.

MamaBear4485 on April 3rd, 2019 at 14:12 UTC »

"motion-activated cameras and computer monitors" Not to mention, who the hell had access to these? What was to stop any security personnel or anyone else who had access to those monitors recording footage on their phones and taking it out of the facility to do whatever the hell they want with it. This is far beyond simply wrong.

TrulyStupidNewb on April 3rd, 2019 at 13:42 UTC »

motion-activated cameras and computer monitors....were meant to catch the thief or thieves responsible for the disappearance of a powerful anesthetic from drug carts.

The question is, did they catch the thief?