Trump Just Echoed the New Zealand Shooter's Language About an 'Invasion' Hours After the Attack

Authored by esquire.com and submitted by 41treys
image for Trump Just Echoed the New Zealand Shooter's Language About an 'Invasion' Hours After the Attack

In October, a man walked into a Pittsburgh synagogue and killed 11 people in an American pogrom. Witnesses said he shouted, "All Jews must die." In the days leading up to the attacks, he posted on the right-wing social media network Gab, echoing a conspiracy related to the migrant "caravan" headed towards the border. He believed a Jewish refugee resettlement group was bringing in "invaders that kill our people"—white people—and that he had no choice but to act.

Five days later, the president tweeted out a racist propaganda film about The Caravan, resuming his campaign to paint it as some combination of The Purge and World War Z. It mirrored the mass murderer's language about an "invasion." But Trump also gave a press conference on the White House lawn where he dabbled in the same anti-Semitic conspiracy theories as the shooter had, saying he "wouldn't be surprised" if someone was funding The Caravan and, when prompted by a reporter, suggested it could be George Soros—the Jewish billionaire and frequent target for right-wing conspiracy theories. "A lot of people say yes," the president said.

On Friday he repeated the feat, as he so often has after a spasm of violence perpetrated by someone who echoes his rhetoric. Less than 24 hours after a mass murderer killed 49 people at two mosques in Christchurch, New Zealand—and posted a manifesto citing the "invasion of France" and the West "by nonwhites," and which referred to Donald Trump, American president, as "a symbol of renewed white identity and common purpose"—the President of the United States said this.

TRUMP echoes white supremacist rhetoric: "Congress' vote to deny the crisis on the southern border is a vote against reality...People hate the word 'invasion,' but that's what it is. It's an invasion of drugs, criminals, & people...in some cases, they are killers." pic.twitter.com/nupFMpmHQZ — Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) March 15, 2019

There is no invasion at the southern border. These Caravans are primarily made up of women, children, and, yes, men, fleeing violence and economic collapse in Central America. They want to declare themselves for asylum and get a hearing, as is their right by law. They are refugees. There is no "national emergency," despite the one Trump declared in order to seize funds for his border wall not appropriated by Congress in a direct assault on the Constitution. He said so himself while declaring it. Even a dozen Republican senators had the courage to say so this week, when they helped pass a resolution rejecting the declaration.

That was what Trump convened this meeting for—to VETO! the bipartisan resolution that condemned his lawless assault on the separation of powers. And he used the opportunity to peddle some of the same white-nationalist rhetoric as a man who committed mass murder on the other side of the world that same day. There is no bottom, and no telling what he is capable of before it's all over. That's particularly true now that the evidence is building that he could be indicted when he leaves office. Just yesterday, before the attack, he once again floated the possibility of political violence from his supporters. He will not stop, and there are no consequences that will deter him if he can save his own skin.

DrKnives on March 16th, 2019 at 00:34 UTC »

As an American, I am unable to adequately describe the shame and anger I feel towards my countries "leaders." That someone like Trump claims to represent us while spewing crap like is disgusting.

Zladan on March 15th, 2019 at 23:00 UTC »

Lets not forget the context of this convo here:

Donnie said he doesn't believe that White Nationalism is a rising problem, right after a guy massacres 49 people for being foreigners (and says Donnie was an inspiration), right after Donnie vetoed a bipartisan bill because he thinks foreigners at our Southern border are dangerous.

But Donnie doesn't think his rhetoric is causing any of this.

Edit: don't forget, both Donnie and the terrorist refers to them as "invaders"

41treys on March 15th, 2019 at 21:38 UTC »

"We are experiencing an invasion on a level never seen before in history." - White Nationalist mass murdering psychopath who killed 49 Muslims in a place of worship yesterday

“People hate the word invasion, but that’s what it is.” - Trump

This is so sickening. We're not being invaded. So many people killed for what? He doesn't have to bring the dead back to life. All he has to do is say, "There is no place for this kind of ideology in America."

Edit.0: To all the lovely people saying a mountain out of a molehill is being made here or how this incident should not be politicized:

The shooter wrote in his manifesto about how Donald Trump was one of his inspirations. The rhetoric of the president carries a different gravity, a different impact on the world than the rhetoric of pundits, doctors, lawyers, and other everyday folk. Every word needs to be carefully considered. It's part of the responsibility of office, to attempt and to give the best at all times. It is a very small hallmark of competency in respect to the presidency for Trump to acknowledge and use different rhetoric. The context of this incident is very important, and expecting better from him is our right as citizens, regardless of how one feels about his views.

Edit.1: I will now be sourcing claims. To all the people saying I am misquoting the manifesto, taking things out of context, or lying about the shooter being inspired by Trump:

"The manifesto also included a single reference to President Donald Trump in which the author asked and answered the question of whether he was a Trump supporter: "As a symbol of renewed white identity and common purpose? Sure. As a policy maker and leader? Dear god no.""

https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/ct-mosque-killer-white-supremacy-20190315-story.html

He thinks Trump is a uniting force for resurgent white nationalism. There is no extrapolation of ideas, no reading between the lines, no assumptions being made here. I am simply reading the quote and taking it at face value. For anyone who would like to contest this point, I will make it simple: "renewed white identity" = resurgent white nationalism/"common purpose" = uniting force. When I look at this quote, it makes me ask in what world is that not being inspired by Trump to shoot up a mosque in the name of fighting off an invasion of non-white people? It's not like Trump's economic policies are the things being discussed here.

Edit.2: To all the fine people saying Trump is talking about illegal immigration and the shooter was against legal immigration, please read this article from another post on this sub. The subjects of the article quite clearly tried to enter legally.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/one-year-ago-america-stole-my-7-year-old-i-want-him-back