Good grief: Victimized employees don't get a break

Authored by eurekalert.org and submitted by mvea

As if being picked on wasn't bad enough, victims of workplace mistreatment may also be seen as bullies themselves, even if they've never engaged in such behavior.

Adding insult to injury, victims may even be seen by supervisors as worse employees, despite exemplary performance. Bullies, on the other hand, may be given a pass if they are liked by their supervisor.

A study about this bias toward victim blaming was recently published in the Journal of Applied Psychology. The peer-reviewed article was co-authored by Shannon Taylor, an associate professor of management in the University of Central Florida's College of Business.

"The results are eye-opening," Taylor says. "I think they are useful because, given all of these accounts in the media of bad behavior happening, people are often left wondering how can we blame victims, and why do we let these perpetrators off the hook, why do they go unpunished?"

Taylor attributes the flawed decision making to cognitive biases, such as the halo effect, in which positive attributes mask negative traits, or the horns effect, in which one negative attribute casts a person in a completely negative light.

He recommends that supervisors receive bias training.

"The first step is really awareness of these biases," Taylor says. "We hope this study will at least bring awareness to people's potential for bias."

The researchers performed their work over the course of four studies. The first two studies showed through surveys of employees and supervisors that supervisors tend to view victims of bullying as being bullies themselves.

Studies three and four were experiments where participants evaluated employees based on descriptions of their work performance, as well as how they treated others and how they were treated.

They found that even when evaluators were clearly informed that a victim did not mistreat others, victims were still seen as bullies. In the fourth study, they found that not only are victims seen as bullies despite evidence to the contrary, but also that they receive lower job performance evaluations as a result of being victimized.

The researchers found support in all four studies that bullies were less likely to be seen as deviant when their supervisor considered them to be good performers.

"What I think is really interesting about this is, when you hear stories of high-profile people engaging in bad behavior at work, a lot of these people have gone unpunished for long periods of time," Taylor says. "And we have examples of victims of this bad behavior being called out and attacked on social media and by the media. Our studies show this is actually pretty common. We're all susceptible to these biases."

An example - the victim blaming that occurred during Christine Blasey Ford's testimony during and after Brett Kavanaugh's Supreme Court confirmation hearing, Taylor says.

Study co-authors included Donald H. Kluemper, an associate professor in the University of Illinois at Chicago Department of Managerial Studies; W. Matthew Bowler, an associate professor in Oklahoma State University's Department of Management; and Jonathon R. B. Halbesleben, interim dean at the University of Alabama's College of Continuing Studies. Mark N. Bing, formerly an associate professor in the University of Mississippi's Department of Management, was also a co-author but passed away before the study was published.

Founded in 1963 with a commitment to expanding opportunity and demanding excellence, the University of Central Florida develops the talent needed to advance the prosperity and welfare of our society. With more than 68,000 students, UCF is one of the nation's largest universities, offering more than 220 degree programs at its main campus in Orlando and more than a dozen other locations in Central Florida and online. For more information, visit ucf.edu.

esmerelda05 on March 10th, 2019 at 15:26 UTC »

Calling out unacceptable behavior everyone else has accepted or ignored makes you the target. A skilled bully divides and looks like the victim. If you show that you're upset at all, the bully is the first one to call you unstable.

the_original_Retro on March 10th, 2019 at 13:43 UTC »

Business consultant weighing in. I've seen this in some parts of my field, when I've been positioned in some of my nastier engagements.

Part of it is caused by a reinforcement feedback loop. "I don't want X on my team because X just stands there and takes it, so they must not be a high performer if they're just sucking that sort of thing up." coupled with "Oh, look, X just snapped and started yelling at everyone! What a psycho! Gee, I don't want them on my team, they're unpredictable and brittle!" How the hell do you escape that trap once it starts besides outright leaving?

Business is built around money and power, and like anything associated with money and power, it attracts less than admirable behaviours unless tightly policed. Get someone in a position of top power who actively encourages dysfunction, and you have a whole workplace that emulates their behaviour. Everything good and normal becomes sacrificed to the gods of money and power, and anything that is in any way counter to those goals becomes sidelined.

What this has taught me is that if you think you are a moral person, look very carefully for this sort of trickle-down behaviour from your company's top tiers, because you might find you start to compromise on what you like about yourself if it's there and you stay there too long. So react early so you don't get caught, or just ride the train and abandon your morals and wade into the swamp with all the other alligators. And you'll win as long as you perform really well and don't care if people like me loathe you.

mvea on March 10th, 2019 at 12:47 UTC »

The title of the post is a copy and paste from the first three paragraphs of the linked academic press release here:

As if being picked on wasn't bad enough, victims of workplace mistreatment may also be seen as bullies themselves, even if they've never engaged in such behavior.

Adding insult to injury, victims may even be seen by supervisors as worse employees, despite exemplary performance. Bullies, on the other hand, may be given a pass if they are liked by their supervisor.

A study about this bias toward victim blaming was recently published in the Journal of Applied Psychology.

Journal Reference:

Kluemper, D. H., Taylor, S. G., Bowler, W. M., Bing, M. N., & Halbesleben, J. R. B. (2019).

How leaders perceive employee deviance: Blaming victims while excusing favorites.

Journal of Applied Psychology. Advance online publication.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/apl0000387

Link: https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2019-01487-001?doi=1

Abstract

Drawing from theories of attribution and perception, we posit that employees who are victims of rudeness are themselves (inappropriately) evaluated by leaders as being interpersonally deviant. We further theorize that employees who are themselves rude to others at work are evaluated negatively, but not when they have high-quality relationships with leaders or are seen as high performers. We tested our predictions across 4 studies. Our first study included 372 leader–follower pairs. Our second study extended to dyadic interactions among employees by using an employee roster method, resulting in paired data from 149 employees (2,184 dyads) across 5 restaurant locations. Our third and fourth studies utilized a policy-capturing design in which individuals provided performance evaluations for fictitious employees. We find that victims of rudeness are viewed by leaders as deviant, and that leaders are less likely to perceive rude employees as deviant when these perpetrators are seen as having high levels of leader–member exchange (LMX) or performance.