Increased Motor Activity Linked to Improved Mood

Authored by jhsph.edu and submitted by mvea

Increased Motor Activity Linked to Improved Mood

Study suggests that increasing motor activity during the day is associated with improved spirits for healthy people, and even more so for people with type I bipolar disorder

Increasing one’s level of physical activity may be an effective way to boost one’s mood, according to a new study from a team including scientists at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health in collaboration with the National Institute of Mental Health Intramural Research Program.

The findings were published online December 12 in JAMA Psychiatry.

The researchers found that increases in physical activity tended to be followed by increases in mood and perceived energy level. This beneficial effect was even more pronounced for a subset of the study subjects who had bipolar disorder. For the study, activity trackers and electronic diaries were used for two weeks in a community sample of 242 (150 women and 92 men) adults, ages 15 to 84, with an average age of 48 years. The sample included 54 people with bipolar disorder.

Mobile assessments in the study included wrist-worn devices that automatically recorded levels of physical movement in real time and electronic diaries that assessed mood and perceived energy levels four times per day for two weeks. These real-time mood and energy levels were rated by study participants on a seven-point analogue scale from “very happy” to “very sad” for mood and from “very tired” to “very energetic” for energy.

“Systems regulating sleep, motor activity and mood have typically been studied independently. This work demonstrates the importance of examining these systems jointly rather than in isolation,” says Vadim Zipunnikov, PhD, an assistant professor in the Bloomberg School’s Department of Biostatistics, who led the data analyses.

The findings showed that on average a higher activity level at one time-point was associated with improved mood and increased perceived energy at the next time-point during the day. (The daily time-points were personalized according to the person’s daily schedule, with one in the morning, at lunchtime, at dinnertime and before bed.) Likewise, increased energy at one time-point was associated with increased activity at the next time-point. Importantly, these associations controlled for the current levels of mood, energy and activity, respectively.

Activity was inversely associated with sleep duration—more activity tended to be followed by less sleep that night, and more sleep tended to be followed by less activity the next day.

Tracking sleep, activity, mood and energy concurrently was particularly important in people with bipolar disorder because the changes in internal psychological states were strongly influenced by both sleep and physical activity. Many of the current interventions for mood, sleep, and physical activity focus on only one of these systems rather than considering the collective impact across multiple systems.

Bipolar disorder affects nearly three percent of the U.S. adult population; depression is even more common, affecting about eight percent of U.S. adults in a given year. The research team is interested in applying this work to interventions that could offset depressive episodes in people with bipolar disorder.

“This study exemplifies the potential for combining the use of physical-activity trackers and electronic diaries to better understand the complex dynamic interrelationships among multiple systems in a real-time and real-life context,” says Dr. Zipunnikov.

The team is now exploring how physical activity and sleep interplay with pain, stress and alcohol use through an international consortium, Motor Activity Research Consortium for Health, to increase the generalizability and power of this work.

“Real-time mobile monitoring of the dynamic associations among motor activity, energy, mood and sleep in adults with bipolar disorder,” was written by Kathleen Ries Merikangas, Joel Swendsen, Ian B. Hickie, Lihong Cui, Haochang Shou, Alison K. Merikangas, Jihui Zhang, Femke Lamers, Ciprian Crainiceanu, Nora D. Volkow, and Vadim Zipunnikov.

Funding was provided by the National Institute of Mental Health (Z-01-MH002804).

Media contacts for the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health: Barbara Benham at 410-614-6029 or [email protected] and Robin Scullin at 410-955-7619 or [email protected].

ClawdiusTheLobster on December 30th, 2018 at 07:36 UTC »

TAKE YOUR MEDS. And then, when you feel like you can face another day of existing, find an audiobook and enjoy a walk at the park. Or better yet,!meet a friend at the gym. Drink more water. Eat a salad or two. In six months, chat with your doctor about your lifestyle changes. KEEP TAKING YOUR MEDS. Journal about your feelings. Take an art class. Be open with your romantic partners. Mentor a new gym member. TAKE YOUR MEDS. After a year, maybe ask about dosage changes. Trust your medical team. Plant a garden. Get some sunshine. TAKE YOUR MEDS. Reward yourself for the changes you have made. TAKE YOUR MEDS. TAKE YOUR MEDS. Take your meds.

I have been on all sides of this equation, and I get it. We all want to believe we are the best judges of our mental state and abilities, because it’s sucks to admit we can’t, but seriously- if you can’t make your own neurotransmitters, store bought is fine. Yes, PLEASE, make healthy lifestyle choices, and I will cheer when they translate to a lower dosage, but as someone who “did it all right” and still ended up at rock bottom, exercise helps - it doesn’t cure.

No guilt. We need you here.

PM_ME_YOUR_EFFORT on December 30th, 2018 at 05:18 UTC »

Haven't we known for damn near a century that physical activity triggers endorphin release? And couldn't Pavlovian conditioning be an unintended consequence?

mvea on December 30th, 2018 at 02:54 UTC »

The title of the post is a copy and paste from the third paragraph of the linked academic press release here:

The researchers found that increases in physical activity tended to be followed by increases in mood and perceived energy level. This beneficial effect was even more pronounced for a subset of the study subjects who had bipolar disorder.

Journal Reference:

Kathleen Ries Merikangas, Joel Swendsen, Ian B. Hickie, Lihong Cui, Haochang Shou, Alison K. Merikangas, Jihui Zhang, Femke Lamers, Ciprian Crainiceanu, Nora D. Volkow, Vadim Zipunnikov.

Real-time Mobile Monitoring of the Dynamic Associations Among Motor Activity, Energy, Mood, and Sleep in Adults With Bipolar Disorder.

JAMA Psychiatry, 2018;

DOI: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.3546

Link: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapsychiatry/fullarticle/2717967

Key Points

Question What are the dynamic associations among motor activity, energy, mood, and sleep, as tracked in real time with mobile monitoring technology, in individuals with a history of bipolar disorder or major depression?

Findings In this case-control study of 242 adults, bidirectional associations were found between motor activity with subjectively rated energy level and sleep duration as well as unidirectional associations between motor activity and mood level. Greater cross-domain reactivity was observed for these associations in people with bipolar I disorder.

Meaning Interventions that target motor activity and energy may alleviate depressed mood more effectively than could current approaches; simultaneous investigations of multiple regulatory systems in bipolar disorder are important in designing therapeutic targets.

Abstract

Importance Biologic systems involved in the regulation of motor activity are intricately linked with other homeostatic systems such as sleep, feeding behavior, energy, and mood. Mobile monitoring technology (eg, actigraphy and ecological momentary assessment devices) allows the assessment of these multiple systems in real time. However, most clinical studies of mental disorders that use mobile devices have not focused on the dynamic associations between these systems.

Objectives To examine the directional associations among motor activity, energy, mood, and sleep using mobile monitoring in a community-identified sample, and to evaluate whether these within-day associations differ between people with a history of bipolar or other mood disorders and controls without mood disorders.

Design, Setting, and Participants This study used a nested case-control design of 242 adults, a subsample of a community-based sample of adults. Probands were recruited by mail from the greater Washington, DC, metropolitan area from January 2005 to June 2013. Enrichment of the sample for mood disorders was provided by volunteers or referrals from the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center or by participants in the National Institute of Mental Health Mood and Anxiety Disorders Program. The inclusion criteria were the ability to speak English, availability to participate, and consent to contact at least 2 living first-degree relatives. Data analysis was performed from June 2013 through July 2018.

Main Outcomes and Measures Motor activity and sleep duration data were obtained from minute-to-minute activity counts from an actigraphy device worn on the nondominant wrist for 2 weeks. Mood and energy levels were assessed by subjective analogue ratings on the ecological momentary assessment (using a personal digital assistant) by participants 4 times per day for 2 weeks.

Results Of the total 242 participants, 92 (38.1%) were men and 150 (61.9%) were women, with a mean (SD) age of 48 (16.9) years. Among the participants, 54 (22.3%) had bipolar disorder (25 with bipolar I; 29 with bipolar II), 91 (37.6%) had major depressive disorder, and 97 (40.1%) were controls with no history of mood disorders. A unidirectional association was found between motor activity and subjective mood level (β = –0.018, P = .04). Bidirectional associations were observed between motor activity (β = 0.176; P = .03) and subjective energy level (β = 0.027; P = .03) as well as between motor activity (β = –0.027; P = .04) and sleep duration (β = –0.154; P = .04). Greater cross-domain reactivity was observed in bipolar disorder across all outcomes, including motor activity, sleep, mood, and energy.

Conclusions and Relevance These findings suggest that interventions focused on motor activity and energy may have greater efficacy than current approaches that target depressed mood; both active and passive tracking of multiple regulatory systems are important in designing therapeutic targets.