September: Wellbeing and health

Authored by bristol.ac.uk and submitted by Wagamaga

There is an increasing need to prevent obesity because of the consequences for mental as well as physical health, new research by academics at the University of Bristol has found.

The study, published online today [Wednesday 26 September] in the BMJ, explored the impact of aspects of physical health, such as body weight, heart health and blood pressure, to see whether a wide age range of individuals with poorer physical health went on to be less happy and less satisfied with their lives.

Previous studies have shown that individuals who are happier and more satisfied with their lives tend to have better physical health and live longer than those who have lower mental wellbeing. But these studies leave the classic chicken and egg question – which comes first?

Using a technique called Mendelian randomization, the researchers asked whether poorer physical health causes lower mental wellbeing, or whether individuals with lower mental wellbeing are more likely to go on to have later problems with their physical health. This technique provides evidence of the direction of causation by using genetic variants that have been associated with physical health and mental wellbeing. Unlike previous methods, this technique helps to rule out the influence of other factors that might be causing both physical health and mental wellbeing.

The research team were able to test 11 measures of physical health including coronary artery disease, heart attack, cholesterol, blood pressure, body fat and Body Mass Index (BMI).

Results suggested a consistent causal effect of higher BMI on lower mental wellbeing. There was little evidence that the other physical health traits were leading to less happiness and life satisfaction. The same pattern of results was seen in a follow-up analysis using the UK Biobank cohort of over 300,000 individuals aged 40 to 70 years old. Here the authors were able to look at different aspects of life satisfaction and found that the key impact of higher BMI was on lower satisfaction with health. They were also able to show that the effect is present from age 40 through to age 70, and in both men and women.

When testing whether mental wellbeing caused any of these physical health traits, the authors found little evidence for a causal impact in that direction, but this analysis is limited because there are so far fewer genetic variants for mental wellbeing. As research uncovers more of the genetic variants associated with mental health traits, researchers will be able to test this direction of effects more thoroughly.

Dr Robyn Wootton, Research Associate from the Medical Research Council Integrative Epidemiology Unit (MRC IEU) at the University of Bristol and the study's lead author, said: "The next question is why we find this link. We are keen to explore the role of body satisfaction and self-esteem, which could help practitioners know how best to support individuals to remain physically and mentally healthy."

Dr Claire Haworth, Reader in Behavioural Genetics in the MRC IEU at the University of Bristol, and senior author on the study, added: "Results so far highlight the pressing need to tackle the obesity crisis because higher BMI is causing the population to be less happy and less satisfied with their lives. This information could be immediately useful to clinicians encouraging patients to maintain a healthy weight.

“Frequently individuals are encouraged to lose weight because this will lead to better physical health, but for many this is not motivating enough. Becoming happier and more satisfied with their lives might be the extra motivation needed to encourage more people to maintain a healthy weight.”

'Evaluation of the causal effects between subjective wellbeing and cardiometabolic health: mendelian randomisation study' by Robyn Wootton et al in BMJ [open access]

jamesinphilly on September 29th, 2018 at 13:53 UTC »

As a physician, what's really upsetting/disturbing to me is that more and more people are identifying as obese, as in it's a core part of their identity that they're proud of and do not want to change. Comparable to race, or sexual orientation.

I had a person on ask immediately on intake if I was going to tell them to lose weight. "Because I'm not going to sit here and be discriminated against for who I am!" I them, you can love yourself and want to make improvements. The two aren't mutually exclusive. That person didn't come back.

Hope-for-Hops on September 29th, 2018 at 11:56 UTC »

"When testing whether mental wellbeing caused any of these physical health traits, the authors found little evidence for a causal impact in that direction, but this analysis is limited because there are so far fewer genetic variants for mental wellbeing. As research uncovers more of the genetic variants associated with mental health traits, researchers will be able to test this direction of effects more thoroughly."

This quote really understates the problem, even with my added bold font for emphasis . IMO, they really could not do a proper check for reverse causality if they tried. Not only are there relatively few variants, but they are extremely weak as well. Identifying risk variants for mental illness has been like trying to find a needle in a haystack. I don't know of a more polygenic phenotype than mental health and, the more possible variants contributing to the phenotype, the smaller their effects, naturally. Some inroads have been made in schizophrenia, but general mental health is still very much an open frontier. And from looking at the identified risk variants so far, I have a hunch that pleiotropy (one gene, many effects) will be an even worse problem than it is for other phenotypes.

Without this check for reverse causation, I really wonder how useful these results are. When I read up on the method they used - Mendelian Randomization - in grad school I was put off by the many potential confounds in the statistics. MR sounds fancy, but is purely a statistical technique borrowed from economics. The experts I talked to were very skeptical of its use when the causal mechanisms between gene and phenotype are not well understood. The most respected MR studies I have seen focused on only a handful of genes (at most) that had very well-defined effects and on phenotypes more specific than just BMI like cholesterol. A genetic risk for obesity purely based on observed correlation stats does not offer the same level of detail and precision.

Interesting study, and I don't begrudge the authors for trying it, but this is extremely preliminary.

I_Miss_Claire on September 29th, 2018 at 11:43 UTC »

Has anyone found any studies with people who struggle w weight gain?

I’ve basically been 130-140 lbs from high school until now in my mid twenties and I have anxiety and depression as well and was just curious if there was any correlation out there for underweight people..