Suspending young students risks future success in school

Authored by news.umich.edu and submitted by mvea
image for Suspending young students risks future success in school

ANN ARBOR—Some kindergartners and first-graders suspended from school can find it challenging to reverse the negative trajectory in their academic life, says a University of Michigan researcher.

These young suspended students—especially boys—are likely to be suspended again later in elementary school, according to Zibei Chen, a research fellow at the U-M School of Social Work, and colleagues at Louisiana State University.

Schools often use suspensions to discipline students, but questions arise about how effective suspension can be in addressing future behavior problems and the impact on academic progress, Chen says.

The result when a solution isn’t found? More students dropping out of school.

“Not only are children who are suspended at a young age missing out on time spent in early learning experiences, but they are also less likely to be referred to services and supports they need to thrive in later school years,” Chen said.

Boys rated by teachers as aggressive, defiant and disruptive are more likely to be suspended than girls. They are also less engaged in school.

Girls rated by teachers as disruptive and lacking in parental school involvement are more likely to be suspended.

Significant predictors of suspension in kindergarten and first grade also predicted suspension one and three years later.

Boys and African-American students are more likely to be suspended than girls and white and Hispanic students, respectively, the study indicated.

Mi-Youn Yang, LSU assistant professor of social work and the study’s lead author, says their findings show that black students experience disproportionate suspensions, but these incidents are not always straightforward. Sometimes these behavioral issues can be reported by teachers who may hold implicit racial biases and not issue the same penalties to white students, she said.

The study appears in Children and Youth Services Review. It used data from an initiative of the Social Research and Evaluation Center at the LSU College of Human Sciences and Education. Other authors include LSU researchers Erin Harmeyer and Blaine Masinter Lofaso.

BrainKatana on September 16th, 2018 at 14:58 UTC »

I always thought the point of suspension wasn’t to punish the offender, but rather an official means to remove a consistently or severely disruptive element from the classroom so that the non disruptive students can continue being educated.

It’s absolutely a “disciplinary action” but I wouldn’t call it a punishment designed to deter future behavior by the offender.

WaxStatue on September 16th, 2018 at 14:40 UTC »

I was a first grade teacher for several years, and at least at my school if a first grader actually made it to the suspension stage, they had done enough to warrant it much earlier. For example, I had a student who threw chairs at me, and was not suspended for it. When asked why, he responded "I don't like him."

He was eventually moved from my class after I missed a few days because of a sprained knee he caused with one of his chair throws. He was never suspended.

rattlestone on September 16th, 2018 at 11:57 UTC »

Main purpose of suspension may not be to help the offender, but to minimize disruption to the rest of the class.