Brown researcher first to describe rapid-onset gender dysphoria

Authored by news.brown.edu and submitted by mvea

Rapid-onset gender dysphoria might spread through groups of friends and may be a harmful coping mechanism, a new study suggests, but more research is needed.

PROVIDENCE, R.I. [Brown University] — For individuals with gender dysphoria, the conflict between experienced gender identity and sex observed at birth produces significant emotional distress.

Until recently, it was unusual for a teen to report initial feelings of gender dysphoria during or after puberty without childhood symptoms. Clinicians have reported that this kind of gender dysphoria is on the rise, particularly for patients whose sex was observed to be female at birth. Additionally, the numbers of adolescents seeking care for gender dysphoria has increased dramatically. It is unknown why these changes are occurring.

This month, a Brown University researcher published the first study to empirically describe teens and young adults who did not have symptoms of gender dysphoria during childhood but who were observed by their parents to rapidly develop gender dysphoria symptoms over days, weeks or months during or after puberty.

“This kind of descriptive study is important because it defines a group and raises questions for more research,” said study author Lisa Littman, an assistant professor of the practice of behavioral and social sciences at Brown’s School of Public Health. “One of the main conclusions is that more research needs to be done. Descriptive studies aren’t randomized controlled trials — you can’t tell cause and effect, and you can’t tell prevalence. It’s going to take more studies to bring in more information, but this is a start.”

The study was published on Aug. 16 in PLoS ONE.

Littman surveyed more than 250 parents of children who suddenly developed gender dysphoria symptoms during or after puberty. She said she wanted to better understand the phenomenon, which seems to be on the rise, but had been considered atypical even just a few years ago. Gender dysphoria is defined as the emotional distress a person feels because of the difference between their experienced gender identity and their sex observed at birth. Gender dysphoria is not the same as gender nonconformity, or not following the stereotypes of one’s assigned gender.

The children of the parents surveyed were more than 80 percent female at birth and ranged between 11 and 27 years old at the time of survey, with an average age of 16. Additionally, 47 percent of the children were reported as academically gifted, and 41 percent expressed a non-heterosexual sexual orientation prior to their gender dysphoria symptoms. Most of the parent respondents were female, white and U.S. residents.

In the 90-question survey, Littman asked the parents about each of the eight indicators for gender dysphoria in childhood that are detailed by the American Psychiatric Association. To meet the diagnostic criteria for gender dysphoria in childhood, a child needs to experience at least six of the eight indicators. Most include readily observable signs, such as a strong rejection of typically feminine or masculine toys and games, and strong resistance to wearing typically feminine or masculine clothes. Eighty percent of the parents reported observing none of these indicators in their children before puberty.

Among the noteworthy patterns Littman found in the survey data: 21 percent of parents reported their child had one or more friends become transgender-identified at around the same time; 20 percent reported an increase in their child’s social media use around the same time as experiencing gender dysphoria symptoms; and 45 percent reported both.

The pattern of clusters of teens in friend groups becoming transgender-identified, the group dynamics of these friend groups and the types of advice viewed online led her to the hypothesis that friends and online sources could spread certain beliefs. Examples include the belief that non-specific symptoms such as feeling uncomfortable in their own skins or feeling like they don’t fit in— which could be a part of normal puberty or associated with trauma — should be perceived as gender dysphoria; the belief that the only path to happiness is transition; and the belief that anyone who disagrees with the teen is transphobic and should be cut out of their life.

“Of the parents who provided information about their child’s friendship group, about a third responded that more than half of the kids in the friendship group became transgender-identified,” Littman said. “A group with 50 percent of its members becoming transgender-identified represents a rate that is more 70 times the expected prevalence for young adults.”

Additionally, 62 percent of parents reported their teen or young adult had one or more diagnoses of a psychiatric disorder or neurodevelopmental disability before the onset of gender dysphoria. Forty-eight percent reported that their child had experienced a traumatic or stressful event prior to the onset of their gender dysphoria, including being bullied, sexually assaulted or having their parents get divorced.

This suggests that the drive to transition expressed by these teens and young adults could be a harmful coping mechanism like drugs, alcohol or cutting, Littman said. With harmful coping mechanisms, certain behaviors are used to avoid feeling negative emotions in the short term, but they do not solve the underlying problems and they often cause additional problems, she noted.

Littman added that more research is needed to determine the prevalence of rapid-onset gender dysphoria, whether adolescent-onset gender dysphoria and rapid-onset gender dysphoria are temporary or likely to be long term, and how to best to support individuals with rapid-onset gender dysphoria and their families.

As a next step, Littman is planning to survey parent/teen pairs where the teenager experienced rapid-onset gender dysphoria and their symptoms of gender dysphoria resolved in one to three years without medical treatment. She has encountered such stories anecdotally, she said, and wants to better understand this phenomenon.

In addition, Littman is currently analyzing data from a survey of 100 people who experienced gender dysphoria, chose to undergo medical or surgical transition, and then de-transitioned by stopping hormone treatment or having surgery to reverse the effects of transition.

“There’s a lot that we don’t know about gender dysphoria,” Littman said. “The cultural landscape has changed very dramatically, so it’s not unexpected to see new types of presentations. It’s important to determine which patients would benefit from medical and surgical transition and which patients would not benefit and might be harmed.”

VicMG on August 25th, 2018 at 15:10 UTC »

So they didn't actually interview any trans people. They went to websites where parents were complaining about their kids claiming to be trans and then got them to fill in a survey about how trans they thought their kids were. This seems... flawed.

A_Windward_flame on August 25th, 2018 at 15:09 UTC »

256 survey responses, from parents reporting that adolescents who "showed no signs of gender dysphoria" as children were reporting gender dysphoria during or after puberty. There is so much wrong with this.

Firstly parental reports of child behaviour are coloured and exceedingly biased - we've established so many instances of this, e.g. parents reporting children becoming hyperactive after consuming sugar, despite independent studies finding no such effect.

That + the fact that puberty is the most significant point of onset of gender dysphoria. That study after study finds minimal difference in trans people's mental health profile pre puberty.

Why is any conclusion being drawn from this at all?

This isn't even science.

PB34 on August 25th, 2018 at 15:00 UTC »

I have to be honest, I am not incredibly impressed with this paper. I realize that it is a descriptive paper, but relying on parent surveys to provide quantifiable information on transgender-identifying teens is...extremely questionable.

When I see the paper reporting stats like how 25% of parents report their teenager no longer hanging out with non-transgender friends, I can’t help but think how unlikely it is that most parents actually have a decent grasp on their kids’ social lives. Like, forget the one million biases around controversial issues like this that would influence parents to not tell the whole truth to the researchers ; I’m very skeptical that parents even know the realities of their kids’ social lives. Especially during the time period from pre-teenagehood to teenagehood, where parents stop arranging playdates and no longer drive their kids to every social interaction.

I wish that the researchers had made more of an effort to provide behavioral or even self report data to confirm their observations. As is, having been a teenager with inquisitive parents myself, I am not remotely confident that any of the findings in this study will replicate. Very curious to see the research that comes out next, though.

[reposting the same comment I made on r/psych here, because the discussion on this sub tends to be higher quality. Is there anyone with experience reading these types of speculative descriptive psych papers who can weigh in on whether or not I’m being too harsh on this paper’s choice of methods?]