New Report Documents Corporate Media's Widespread Failure to Cover Link Between Climate Crisis and Extreme Weather

Authored by commondreams.org and submitted by maxwellhill
image for New Report Documents Corporate Media's Widespread Failure to Cover Link Between Climate Crisis and Extreme Weather

Bolstering observations made by at least one media critic this week, Public Citizen showed in a new report on Friday that news reports largely ignore the link between the climate crisis and the extreme heat that is currently enveloping cities and regions all over the world.

The consumer advocacy group's report (pdf), "Extreme Silence," found that from January 1 to July 8, only about seven percent of cable news reports on record high temperatures mentioned the climate crisis. Meanwhile, less than a fifth of such reports in the top 50 most-read American newspapers addressed climate change.

"Climate change is already harming Americans, and soon it will pose an existential threat," David Arkush, managing director of Public Citizen's climate program, said in a statement. "But most Americans still think of the problem as distant, hurting people long in the future or in faraway places. The media's failure to cover climate has a big role in that complacency. We need much better reporting if the public is going to wake up and demand action in time to prevent catastrophe."

A poll conducted by Gallup earlier this year found that only 45 percent of Americans think the climate crisis would have an impact on them or their communities in their lifetime. In fact, research shows that the warming earth and resulting sea level rise has already forced at least 17 American communities from their homes.

"We need much better reporting if the public is going to wake up and demand action in time to prevent catastrophe." —David Arkush, Public CitizenMore Americans may understand the urgency of the situation if major newspapers and news programs discussed the leading cause of extreme weather while reporting on heatwaves, hurricanes, droughts, and wildfires, argued Public Citizen in its report.

"This review identified some notable exceptions and models how best to cover climate in the context of extreme heat events," reads the report. "Overall, however, U.S. news outlets continue to tell only half the story. These exceptions need to become the norm if the public is going to wake from its slumber on climate change in time to take the bold action we urgently need to avoid catastrophic harm, and possibly even an existential threat to the U.S., later this century."

Out of 760 climate and weather-related articles in major publications since the beginning of the year, just 134 also addressed the climate crisis.

Ten of the 50 newspapers with the highest circulation—including the Tampa Bay Times and the Detroit Free Press—have yet to mention climate change at all this year.

"The media is failing at the job of covering one of the most important issues of our time." —David Arkush, Public CitizenAs for television networks, out of 226 climate-related segments produced by ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, Fox News, and MSNBC, the climate crisis came up in just 16 of them.

Public Citizen's study was released on the heels of reports of deadly wildfires in Greece and California, an unprecedented heatwave in the Arctic, and temperatures reaching 124 degrees Fahrenheit in Algeria this month—setting records for the country as well as the entire continent of Africa.

"Overall, these findings suggest that the extreme heat event that scorched much of the U.S. over nearly two weeks in late June and early July 2018 failed to prompt conversations about climate change in national or local media," said Arkush. "The media is failing at the job of covering one of the most important issues of our time."

Raspberries-Are-Evil on July 29th, 2018 at 17:58 UTC »

Not to mention that people need to understand the difference between "Climate" and "Weather."

foxnewsbenghazi on July 29th, 2018 at 17:54 UTC »

The Union of Concerned Scientists analyzed the major news networks' climate change coverage: https://www.ucsusa.org/global-warming/solutions/fight-misinformation/cable-news-coverage-climate-change-science.html

Fox News is not only the most watched news network in the US, it's also the worst by any measure:

A 2010 Stanford University survey found "more exposure to Fox News was associated with more rejection of many mainstream scientists' claims about global warming, [and] with less trust in scientists".[75]

In 2011, a study by Fairleigh Dickinson University found that New Jersey Fox News viewers were less well informed than people who did not watch any news at all.

67% of Fox viewers believed that the "U.S. has found clear evidence in Iraq that Saddam Hussein was working closely with the al Qaeda terrorist organization" (compared with 56% for CBS, 49% for NBC, 48% for CNN, 45% for ABC, 16% for NPR/PBS).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fox_News_Channel_controversies#Tests_of_knowledge_of_Fox_viewers

Daily memos

Photocopied memos instructed the network's on-air anchors and reporters to use positive language when discussing pro-life viewpoints, the Iraq War, and tax cuts, as well as requesting that the Abu Ghraib prisoner abuse scandal be put in context with the other violence in the area.[84] Such memos were reproduced for the film Outfoxed, which included Moody quotes such as, "The soldiers [seen on Fox in Iraq] in the foreground should be identified as 'sharpshooters,' not 'snipers,' which carries a negative connotation."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fox_News_Channel_controversies#Internal_memos_and_e-mail

Here Are The Tricks That Fox News Uses To Manipulate Statistics On Its Graphics

https://www.businessinsider.com/fox-news-charts-tricks-data-2012-11

Climate Consensus - the 97% + Fox News

American conservatives are still clueless about the 97% expert climate consensus

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent+media/fox-news

Fox News co-founder and sexual harassment monster Roger Ailes had a history of denying science for Republicans and big corporations:

Ailes repackaged Richard Nixon for television in 1968, papered over Ronald Reagan’s budding Alzheimer’s in 1984, shamelessly stoked racial fears to elect George H.W. Bush in 1988, and waged a secret campaign on behalf of Big Tobacco to derail health care reform in 1993 – Ailes inked a secret deal with tobacco giants Philip Morris and RJ Reynolds to go full-force after the Clinton administration on its central policy objective: health care reform.

Hillarycare was to have been funded, in part, by a $1-a-pack tax on cigarettes. To block the proposal, Big Tobacco paid Ailes to produce ads highlighting “real people affected by taxes.”

"He was the premier guy in the business," says former Reagan campaign manager Ed Rollins. "He was our Michelangelo." Full profile

A memo entitled “A Plan for Putting the GOP on TV News,” buried in the the Nixon library details a plan between Ailes and the White House to bring pro-administration stories to television networks around the country. It reads: “People are lazy. With television you just sit—watch—listen. The thinking is done for you.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/blogpost/post/richard-nixon-and-roger-ailes-1970s-plan-to-put-the-gop-on-tv/2011/07/01/AG1W7XtH_blog.html

The billionaire other co-founder of Fox News is Australian media mogul Rupert Murdoch who also has media empire there biased to Australia's wealthy/conservative political party and fossil fuel industry and a much larger media empire in the UK that helped create Brexit with the same kind of Fox News racist tactics as:

President Obama's birthday BBQ with Tom Hanks and OK Go: "Obama's Hip-Hop Barbecue Didn't Create Jobs", President Obama "has a deep-seated hatred for white people or the white culture" and "is racist," President Obama tan suit scandal, mustard scandal, First Lady Michelle Obama showing shoulders scandal, "terrorist fist jab," "LA's Hispanic Mayor Wants Taller Walls Around His Mansion"

photoshopped Jewish reporters' noses

Robert Mercer, the billionaire funder of Breitbart (http://www.esquire.com/news-politics/news/a52141/wildest-breitbart-headlines/) and Cambridge Analytica (https://www.theguardian.com/news/2018/mar/18/facebook-cambridge-analytica-joseph-chancellor-gsr):

that climate change is not happening. It's not for real, and if it is happening, it's going to be good for the planet

that nuclear war is really not such a big deal. And they've actually argued that outside of the immediate blast zone in Japan during World War II - outside of Hiroshima and Nagasaki - that the radiation was actually good for the Japanese. So they see a kind of a silver lining in nuclear war and nuclear accidents. Bob Mercer has certainly embraced the view that radiation could be good for human health - low level radiation.

Among other things, Mercer said the United States went in the wrong direction after the 1964 Civil Rights Act, and also insisted the only remaining racists in the United States were African-Americans

They own part of the data mining company Cambridge Analytica, which played a role in Trump's victory last year. That has given both Mercers a strong foothold in the Trump White House, and last year Politico called Rebekah Mercer "The Most Powerful Woman in GOP Politics." Mercer's influence hasn't been confined to the United States: He was a key supporter of Leave.eu, which spearheaded last summer's successful Brexit campaign.

https://www.npr.org/2017/03/22/521083950/inside-the-wealthy-family-that-has-been-funding-steve-bannon-s-plan-for-years

Helpful graph of why scientists are comfortable about discussing the increasing extreme heat events and climate change together

9000yardsofbliss on July 29th, 2018 at 17:06 UTC »

Worse yet, if anyone makes the connection some (Murdoch) media attacks them.

As happened in Oz a few years back.