"Existential Isolation": Why Is it Higher Among Males?

Authored by psychologytoday.com and submitted by mvea

Humans are hyper-social. Everything we think, feel, and do is influenced by our social experiences. This is the case even when we are alone as past, current, and future social experiences and culture itself continue to shape us.

What I am basically saying is there is no , emotion, or action independent of a social component for humans. That might sound like an extreme view, and maybe it is, but I honestly can't imagine an argument that could counter it.

Now, in the midst of this, many people, perhaps all people, feel to varying degrees as though their subjective experiences are not shared by other people. In their minds what they think, see, feel, is not what other people think, see, feel. This is perhaps best echoed in statements such as "I feel like I am living in a different universe to everyone else."

This is why research on "I-sharing" — sharing a subjective experience with someone else - is so powerful. This work shows that this can improve relationships between members of different racial groups (e.g., less dehumanization and ), and generally increase feelings of closeness with other people. What's remarkable, I think, is that these shared experiences are often seemingly trivial, such as another participant in the study wanting to be a specific animal that you would want to be out of a list of four animals provided. Both want to be a turtle? Well dang, time to feel some social connection.

I-sharing is most powerful among people who feel existential isolation. And current research headed by Peter Helm at the University of Arizona shows that existential isolation tends to be stronger among men than women. But why?

These researchers first conducted a survey to test if this could be accounted for by differences in . This was not the case as the gender difference existed even when controlling for the influence of being lonely.

In a follow up survey they found that valuing communal traits (e.g., kindness, warmth, ) was associated with less existential isolation. Further, the reason males had more existential isolation than females was because women tended to value communal traits more highly.

This work is consistent with a broad range of research showing that males are restricted in the range of emotions that are deemed socially acceptable (at least males tend to think this). Being warm, kind, and emotional really at all (except for ) is not viewed by males as desirable (relative to for females). As such, males feel existential isolation, because they accept social norms that impede their ability to truly connect with other people.

OldBrownSock on June 30th, 2018 at 17:02 UTC »

I see the definition of existential isolation, but can someone who knows what it means explain it to me in different words?

ArtemisBen on June 30th, 2018 at 16:11 UTC »

I've thought about this during Brexit talks as I live in England. One thing that is brought up about Brexit is the fact that people from the UK don't feel connected to the rest of Europe and don't care about the European Identity. Whenever this was brought up I couldn't help but think the same thing for my own countrymen, I don't really feel connected to anyone, even people who live in my tiny area or to be honest, my household.

mvea on June 30th, 2018 at 11:50 UTC »

The title of the post is a copy and paste from the fifth, seventh and eight paragraphs of the linked academic press release here :

I-sharing is most powerful among people who feel existential isolation. And current research headed by Peter Helm at the University of Arizona shows that existential isolation tends to be stronger among men than women. But why?

In a follow up survey they found that valuing communal traits (e.g., kindness, warmth, empathy) was associated with less existential isolation. Further, the reason males had more existential isolation than females was because women tended to value communal traits more highly.

This work is consistent with a broad range of research showing that males are restricted in the range of emotions that are deemed socially acceptable (at least males tend to think this). Being warm, kind, and emotional really at all (except for anger) is not viewed by males as desirable (relative to for females). As such, males feel existential isolation, because they accept social norms that impede their ability to truly connect with other people.

Journal Reference:

Peter J. Helm, Lyla G. Rothschild, Jeff Greenberg, Alyssa Croft,

Explaining sex differences in existential isolation research, Personality and

Individual Differences, Volume 134, 1 November 2018, Pages 283-288, ISSN 0191-8869,

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.06.032.

Link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886918303647

Abstract:

Existential isolation (EI) is the subjective experience of feeling fundamentally separate from other human beings. Recent studies examining EI have observed a consistent sex difference wherein men report higher levels of EI than women. Our first study used a large undergraduate survey. It replicated the sex difference in EI and showed that controlling for loneliness and self-esteem did not account for this difference. Study 2 replicated this pattern using an online sample, and tested the hypothesis that this difference may be mediated by the sex difference in endorsement of communal and agentic values. We found that sex differences in endorsement of communal (but not agentic) values mediated the sex difference in EI. However, agentic value endorsement played no role. These findings indicate that men may be higher in existential isolation because they do not endorse communal values as much as women do. This suggests that one way to reduce the disproportionate experience of EI among men may be to increase their endorsement of communal values.